Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 234 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject Text Attachments
  67859   Sun Apr 12 21:12:29 2015 Question David PilgramDavid.Pilgram@epost.org.ukQuestionLinux3.1.0 c701Odd behaviour when attaching a file to an entryHaving installed v3.1.0 on a test logbook,
I find that I can browse and select a file,
but when I click on the "Upload"
  
  67858   Fri Apr 10 09:59:42 2015 Reply Oliver Kleinauoliver.kleinau@it.niedersachsen.deQuestionLinux3.1Re: Max Logbooks for Email notifyIt was str variable in function process_http_request
in elogd.c.

This should have the size of received
  
  67857   Fri Apr 10 08:37:19 2015 Reply Oliver Kleinauoliver.kleinau@it.niedersachsen.deQuestionLinux3.1Re: Max Logbooks for Email notifyIt seems to be the GET buffer of the elog-Server.
The GET statement is cut off after &sub_lb72=1&sub_
eg. 1000 chars.
  
  67856   Wed Apr 8 11:40:27 2015 Angy Oliver Kleinauoliver.kleinau@it.niedersachsen.deQuestionLinux3.1Max Logbooks for Email notifyHi,

we've got 109 logbooks in Elog.
Whenever I set a notify for all logbooks
  
  67855   Thu Apr 2 15:44:33 2015 Idea Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoAll3.1.0ELOG Version 3.1.0 announcementThis is an announcement for the ELOG version
3.1.0 being released just now. Among several
bug fixes and an improved Drag & Drop
  
  67854   Wed Apr 1 20:25:21 2015 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindowsELOG V2.9.Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome? </table>[quote="Andreas Luedeke"]Now I'm confused:
if I create an entry with "elog -n 2 ...",
then I put HTML code into elog and it is
  
  67853   Wed Apr 1 18:39:14 2015 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chQuestionWindowsELOG V2.9.Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?

Proof of principle ;-)
  
  67852   Wed Apr 1 18:31:28 2015 Reply Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chQuestionWindowsELOG V2.9.Re: Strange browser behaviour with chrome?[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Andreas Luedeke"]If
the content has been added with the "elog"
command as HTML then it can contain mismatching
  
ELOG V3.1.5-2eba886