Re: Error: Entry text too big. Please increase TEXT_SIZE and recompile elogd, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Nov 30 08:51:55 2016
|
How big is your image? I just tried a 5000 x 3600 pixel image (8 MB in size), and it worked fine on the demo logbook.
Stefan
Xuan |
|
Re: Error: Entry text too big. Please increase TEXT_SIZE and recompile elogd, posted by Xuan Wu on Thu Dec 1 01:40:14 2016
|
I just test on your Demo logbook. I use a screen-capture tool to create an image which doesn't been saved as a file, the size is 1920*1080(1.8M),
then copy it in clipboard, and then paste in text area. Then the web page become very slow, so that I can't submit it sometime. Sometime, I can submit
it but it say "Entry text too big. Please increase TEXT_SIZE and recompile elogd". If I drop an image file into the text area, it works. I used |
|
Re: Error: Entry text too big. Please increase TEXT_SIZE and recompile elogd, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Dec 1 08:13:41 2016
|
Ah, that's the difference! I always drop an image on the text area, never paste it. So please refrain from pasting.
Xuan
Wu wrote:
I just test on your Demo logbook. I use a screen-capture tool to |
Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by fbretel on Wed Feb 8 16:38:15 2017
|
Hi,
As mentionned before, we happen to fail to receive email messages related to updates on
elog entries at our site. My understanding is that the SMTP header Message-Id MUST be unique for each email message. Whereas all elogd email |
|
Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 8 18:16:30 2017
|
A pull request would be highy appreciated, because you can then test it thoroughly on your side. Adding a random number to the message id is simple.
"Reply-to" indeed does not make sense since elog cannot receive emails. Most sites use a generic "noreply@<domain>" to indicate
to the user that a reply does not make sense. I guess the "Reply-to" does not have to be unique, right? |
|
Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by fbretel on Wed Mar 15 16:04:13 2017
|
| Pull-request posted. Cheers. |
|
Re: Possible misuse of email headers Message-Id and In-Reply-To, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 15 16:42:35 2017
|
Pull-request merged.
fbretel
wrote:
Pull-request posted. |
command line and apache+ldap authentication, posted by Stefano Lacaprara on Thu Apr 6 17:36:46 2017
|
Hi,
we are running an elogd (with SSL) server on a machine and using apache as a proxy.
|