Is there a way to remove the "Remove user" button from non-Amin users config page?

BTW Stefan ELOG is a Great Solution!

Thanks

Mark. 

 One hour adrift at this time of the year sounds like daylight saving.  Or compensation thereof.  What is your computer clock set to (not what time the clock reads)?

Personally I think it rather naughty that [at least older] Windoze automatically sets the clock one hour forward the first reboot after the spring switch forward, and the same in the autumn back.  What if you'd already done it, like all the rest of the clocks in the house?

Does anyone have a method to query the log file?  I wish to automate a summary report based on a defined timeframe (8hr shift) and deliver a report to the owners/managers of the logbook. 

maybe even generate the summary report as an HTML entery within the logbook, encapsulating the enteries queried with the hyperlinks intact to the entries in question.

Anyone have something like this? Hate to recreate the wheel. I will share if I come up with something

Is it a time zone issue or a setting issue related to the FIND by date / time issue?

It seems to add an hour to each of the time selections once you select SEARCH. see attached pics

> Hello,
> 
> I've had much success and use with ELOG.  However there is one thing that I wish I could figure out in order to 
> make ELOG work exactly as I need it.
> 
> When I either create a new ELOG entry, or, have one created via an automated scrip run by CRON, the paragraph 
> width is preset. 
> 
> I've read the notes and experimented with setting the text size, but it seems that if I either adjust it via the 
> config file, or, change the size by dragging the message box itself, then I end up with an ELOG entry that has an 
> irregular message size to it than all the others.  Consistency and uniformity is very important to me for how I 
> use ELOG.
> 
> It would be idea, if the log entries did not contain <CR>'s or justified lines.  In other words, I would like to 
> be able to have my ELOG entry fill the width of the screen, be it a wide screen or standard portrait scree, and 
> at whatever resolution and text size I have my browser set to.
> 
> By not filling the entire width (and also by not having it auto adjust depending on screen size, resolution, 
> etc.) there are large portions of the screen real estate that is lost and you end up with very long, scrolling 
> log entries versus entries that file the entire width and therefor take less vertical screen space.
> 
> With all that said -- Does anyone else have this issue?  And, is there anything I can do to correct this?  This 
> would make me a very happy user if it could be done.
> 
> Thank you in advance!
Hi Ryan,

Do you quote the previous entries in later entries, with the '>' character (as above)?  I ask this because that will
make what you are requesting much more complicated, soon making those previous entries very difficult to read
indeed.

For me, readabiliy of previous quoted entries is important - along with the indenting '>' character to denote each
entry - your request would be an issue for me simply because of how many times an entry may get re-quoted in later
replies - over 40 is not uncommon.  As such, I tend to keep my lines short when writing an entry, being aware
that it could soon have a large number of '>' characters preceeding it.

[Sep 03 07:30]
Not an aside as such, but I have tried to experiment with this quoting business, to remove the '>' character (easy
enough) but have each quoted reply headed with a simple date/timestamp *within* this text box, such as I headed this
paragraph.  It hasn't worked as I expected, and I'm not sure why - maybe it might even be a bug!  But if that
could be cracked, then your suggestion would be a boon to me as well.
 

Hello,

I've had much success and use with ELOG.  However there is one thing that I wish I could figure out in order to 
make ELOG work exactly as I need it.

When I either create a new ELOG entry, or, have one created via an automated scrip run by CRON, the paragraph 
width is preset. 

I've read the notes and experimented with setting the text size, but it seems that if I either adjust it via the 
config file, or, change the size by dragging the message box itself, then I end up with an ELOG entry that has an 
irregular message size to it than all the others.  Consistency and uniformity is very important to me for how I 
use ELOG.

It would be idea, if the log entries did not contain <CR>'s or justified lines.  In other words, I would like to 
be able to have my ELOG entry fill the width of the screen, be it a wide screen or standard portrait scree, and 
at whatever resolution and text size I have my browser set to.

By not filling the entire width (and also by not having it auto adjust depending on screen size, resolution, 
etc.) there are large portions of the screen real estate that is lost and you end up with very long, scrolling 
log entries versus entries that file the entire width and therefor take less vertical screen space.

With all that said -- Does anyone else have this issue?  And, is there anything I can do to correct this?  This 
would make me a very happy user if it could be done.

Thank you in advance!

Hi.

I'd like to package ELOG for the new Debian. I'm a complete beginner in
this matter, but I spent some time configuring it for my desktop.

Could you help me do this (links to package maintainance, Elog tips,
security, former package maintainer...) ?

Thanks for any help.

--

Nicolas FRANCOIS                      |  /\
http://nicolas.francois.free.fr       | |__|
                      X--/\\
We are the Micro$oft.                _\_V
Resistance is futile.           
You will be assimilated.         darthvader penguin
 

Yes. Just make sure that both elog servers are not running when you move the password file.