Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 329 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Versiondown Subject
  67477   Tue Apr 23 22:14:42 2013 Question Matthew D.364603@swan.ac.ukQuestionLinux2.9.2Exim4

 Hi,

My email configuration is a little complicated as all emails must be relayed to a central server with TLS authentication. 

So far I've been unable to get the ELOG to work with email, after numerous attempts .  I have got exim4 working on this machine but I don't understand how the elog sends emails well enough, to configure it to recognise and use exim4.  Setting localhost/ my domain/ IP  (and variations) under 'smtp host' doesn't work. (cannot connect to server)

The most interesting error I have been able to get is:

"AUTH command used when not advertised"

or

"Unrecognized authentication type"

Any advice?

 

  67478   Wed Apr 24 11:00:41 2013 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: Exim4

Matthew D. wrote:

 Hi,

My email configuration is a little complicated as all emails must be relayed to a central server with TLS authentication. 

So far I've been unable to get the ELOG to work with email, after numerous attempts .  I have got exim4 working on this machine but I don't understand how the elog sends emails well enough, to configure it to recognise and use exim4.  Setting localhost/ my domain/ IP  (and variations) under 'smtp host' doesn't work. (cannot connect to server)

The most interesting error I have been able to get is:

"AUTH command used when not advertised"

or

"Unrecognized authentication type"

Any advice?

 

Not much. ELOG uses plain SMTP to port 25, but does not support TLS internally. From your error messages above it looks like exim4 (which I never used) uses a different authentication scheme than ELOG supports. ELOG dos a "AUTH LOGIN" which is described for example here:

http://www.fehcom.de/qmail/smtpauth.html

Maybe you can try authentication completely off (remove "SMTP username" from elogd.cfg) ?

/Stefan

 

 

  67480   Fri Apr 26 19:00:07 2013 Idea Garret Delarondegarret.delaronde@gmail.comQuestionWindows2.9.2Google Places API AutoComplete

 G'day everyone.

Looking for some input on this idea.

I work for an organization which uses elog extensively for day to day operations.

In several of our logbooks we use a "location" attribute where we would enter an address or intersection.

I am working with the google places api and am able to create the auto complete form in a separate html page, but am interested if anyone has a good direction how i could change the input box into the google map autocomplete search box.

 

I have the code already for the api search box. but when i add it to the config it doesn't really do anything different.

Attached is the html file i setup with the api code.

the autocomplete works great, now i just want it to work in elog.

Any help is much appreciated!

And perhaps the Elog Powers that be might be interested in making it a function down the road? :)

Attachment 1: Test_Search.html
  67486   Sat Apr 27 14:09:13 2013 Reply Achim Dreyerml10352@adreyer.comRequestLinux2.9.2Re: Support for modern Linux

Vinícius Ferrão wrote:

Hello folks,

Can we have a better support under modern Linux distributions?

I'm trying to install elog in our webserver and it's becoming a boring task. First of all theres only RPM packages. And we really don't like the Red Hat method, so we use Debian Servers. More package mainteners would be nice.

 

The software appears to be working correctly, but there are some bugs (or perhaps missing dependencies?); the init script put in /etc/rc.d/init.d is broken under Debian:

First of all because it's in /etc/rc.d.

 

The second problem is in this line:

 

# Source function library.

#. /etc/rc.d/init.d/functions

The file doesn't even exists.

 

The third problem is the echo_success; echo_failure commands that doesn't even exist. As I can see it's definitions are sourced in the functions file that doesn't exist.

 

After removing this missing commands or files from the init.d; I can call elogd script and start the daemon under root. Appears to be working...

 

And last but not least; there's a way to standardize the init script to run in other Linux distros, so we can put it to start automatically at boot time?

 

Many thanks in advance,

Vinícius Ferrão 

 

PS: I'm not asking to support any creepy distros, but to support the .deb package format and system style.

 

 

 

 

/etc/rc.d/init.d/functions is part of the initscripts.rpm - so only usable on RedHat/CentOS..

Can someone also update https://midas.psi.ch/elog/download.html ? It was last updated in 2001 and the download directory contains a debian package that was last updated 2004. If debian is not supported in a current version that bit should be removed from the page.

Kind regards,
Achim
  67489   Thu May 2 21:10:23 2013 Question Hal Proctorhproctor2@gmail.comInfoWindows2.9.2Kerberos on VM server 64bit

 I have a logbook installed on a Windows 64 bit VM server 2008 R2 and can access it fine using the password file.  However when using Kerberos it does not authenticate correctly.  I installed Kerberos and pointed it to the realm an domain controller.  Using KINIT command line it appears to accept my password.  Any help is appriciated.  Perhaps some other diagnostics i could try against the kerberos install

Here is global settings:

port = 49212

ssl = 1 

url = https://my-elog.domain.com:49212/

Authentication = Kerberos, file

Kerberos Realm = DOMAIN.COM

Admin User = me

Max content length = 10485760

Password file = pw.txt

Allow password change = 1  (perhaps this is an issue???)

 

Also...when adding users to the logbook, do you leave the password blank if using Kerberos?

  67490   Fri May 3 14:41:01 2013 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chInfoWindows2.9.2Re: Kerberos on VM server 64bit

Hal Proctor wrote:

 I have a logbook installed on a Windows 64 bit VM server 2008 R2 and can access it fine using the password file.  However when using Kerberos it does not authenticate correctly.  I installed Kerberos and pointed it to the realm an domain controller.  Using KINIT command line it appears to accept my password.  Any help is appriciated.  Perhaps some other diagnostics i could try against the kerberos install

Here is global settings:

port = 49212

ssl = 1 

url = https://my-elog.domain.com:49212/

Authentication = Kerberos, file

Kerberos Realm = DOMAIN.COM

Admin User = me

Max content length = 10485760

Password file = pw.txt

Allow password change = 1  (perhaps this is an issue???)

 

Also...when adding users to the logbook, do you leave the password blank if using Kerberos?

You can leave the password just blank.

The "Allow password change = 1" does not make any difference. It works here even with this option.

So I have no idea why you have that problem. Does it work on another computer, i.e. is it related to the 64 bit VM machine?

Best regards,
Stefan 

  67491   Fri May 3 19:09:45 2013 Reply Hal Proctorhproctor2@gmail.comInfoWindows2.9.2Re: Kerberos on VM server 64bit

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Hal Proctor wrote:

 I have a logbook installed on a Windows 64 bit VM server 2008 R2 and can access it fine using the password file.  However when using Kerberos it does not authenticate correctly.  I installed Kerberos and pointed it to the realm an domain controller.  Using KINIT command line it appears to accept my password.  Any help is appriciated.  Perhaps some other diagnostics i could try against the kerberos install

Here is global settings:

port = 49212

ssl = 1 

url = https://my-elog.domain.com:49212/

Authentication = Kerberos, file

Kerberos Realm = DOMAIN.COM

Admin User = me

Max content length = 10485760

Password file = pw.txt

Allow password change = 1  (perhaps this is an issue???)

 

Also...when adding users to the logbook, do you leave the password blank if using Kerberos?

You can leave the password just blank.

The "Allow password change = 1" does not make any difference. It works here even with this option.

So I have no idea why you have that problem. Does it work on another computer, i.e. is it related to the 64 bit VM machine?

Best regards,
Stefan 

 

The kerberos install, installed the Network Identity Manager and placed krb5 config in my windows directory.  Can a server run lsass.exe only?   or does the krb5 config file and Network Identity Manager need to be on the server?

 

  67492   Fri May 3 19:27:53 2013 Reply Hal Proctorhproctor2@gmail.comInfoWindows2.9.2Re: Kerberos on VM server 64bit

Hal Proctor wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Hal Proctor wrote:

 I have a logbook installed on a Windows 64 bit VM server 2008 R2 and can access it fine using the password file.  However when using Kerberos it does not authenticate correctly.  I installed Kerberos and pointed it to the realm an domain controller.  Using KINIT command line it appears to accept my password.  Any help is appriciated.  Perhaps some other diagnostics i could try against the kerberos install

Here is global settings:

port = 49212

ssl = 1 

url = https://my-elog.domain.com:49212/

Authentication = Kerberos, file

Kerberos Realm = DOMAIN.COM

Admin User = me

Max content length = 10485760

Password file = pw.txt

Allow password change = 1  (perhaps this is an issue???)

 

Also...when adding users to the logbook, do you leave the password blank if using Kerberos?

You can leave the password just blank.

The "Allow password change = 1" does not make any difference. It works here even with this option.

So I have no idea why you have that problem. Does it work on another computer, i.e. is it related to the 64 bit VM machine?

Best regards,
Stefan 

 

The kerberos install, installed the Network Identity Manager and placed krb5 config in my windows directory.  Can a server run lsass.exe only?   or does the krb5 config file and Network Identity Manager need to be on the server?

 

 Installed both on a Windows 2003 R2 server (32bit) and Kerberos not authenticating, yet gievs me a ticket thru kinit.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6