| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
68607
|
Thu Apr 20 13:48:43 2017 |
 | K | p1454477@mvrht.com | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Full anonymous access | OK, i will try that. Thanks.
|
|
|
68640
|
Fri Jul 14 19:26:06 2017 |
 | Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Email Notification (Not) Initiated by elog Client Utility | Our configuration sends out e-mail notifications
based on a hierarchy of attributes, and works
fine with WEB submissions, but not with client |
|
|
68641
|
Wed Jul 19 08:50:16 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Email Notification (Not) Initiated by elog Client Utility | Yes, parentheses in field content might
be difficult to pass from a shell command.
You did not even mention which Linux shell |
|
|
68643
|
Wed Jul 19 08:59:52 2017 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Email Notification (Not) Initiated by elog Client Utility | Thank you for responding.
I thought I provided the command
at the end of the note: |
|
|
68644
|
Wed Jul 19 10:14:44 2017 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Email Notification (Not) Initiated by elog Client Utility | If that is your command then it is obvious
why no email is send:
you do set "Type=Type", |
|
|
68645
|
Wed Jul 19 10:25:08 2017 |
| Phil Rubin | rubinp@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Email Notification (Not) Initiated by elog Client Utility | I didn't realize you required every
detail of the command, since the entry is
being logged, but here is an example (only |
|
|
68792
|
Fri May 4 14:43:35 2018 |
 | Joseph McKenna | joseph.mckenna@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | We have a possible bug with elog that the
ID for an elog entry at over 99,999 entires
reads as 10,000... |
|
|
68793
|
Fri May 4 16:05:32 2018 |
| Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | I am not sure I understand your bug report.
I can easily create IDs greater
than 100'000 (see attached picture), |
|