Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 353 of 806  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Show attachments  Show only new entries    6445 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 352, 353, 354 ... 804, 805, 806   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  66986   Wed Jan 19 08:44:28 2011 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.7.8-2280Re: Quick Filter does not work

Michael Dannmeyer wrote:

Hello,

i have a logbook with the following parameters for the Attribute "Typ":

[TEST1]
Options Typ = SDB{2}, Qualifizierung B.12.S227{4}, Qualifizierung PRO/REP{3}, Dokument zur Qualifizierung{2}, Prüf- und Wartungsvorschrift{2}, SOP ohne Change Request{2}, SOP mit Change Request{1}, Validierung PRO/REP{3}, Dokument zur Verifizierung{2}, Überprüfung und Verlängerung{2}, Spec.Sheet{2}, CoA (sofern nicht LIMS){2}, Änderungen Tg4.B07{5}, OOS (Plan/Bericht){3}, Transfer PRO/REP{3}, Studie PRO/REP{3}, Studie ohne Plan{2}, Anderes{2}
Quick filter = Date, Typ

If i choose an Entry from the "Typ" Quick Filter it shows me that there are no entries in the logbook but I'm shure that there are entries. 

Can you please help? I cannot see what's wrong.

Best Regards

Michael

 

I tried your configuration and it worked fine:

Capture001.png 

So can you try version 2.8.1 if that makes any difference. If not, can you send me your complete elogd.cfg, so that I can reproduce your problem.

- Stefan

  66985   Mon Jan 17 17:24:35 2011 Question Michael Dannmeyermichael.dannmeyer@solvias.comQuestionWindows2.7.8-2280Quick Filter does not work

Hello,

i have a logbook with the following parameters for the Attribute "Typ":

[TEST1]
Options Typ = SDB{2}, Qualifizierung B.12.S227{4}, Qualifizierung PRO/REP{3}, Dokument zur Qualifizierung{2}, Prüf- und Wartungsvorschrift{2}, SOP ohne Change Request{2}, SOP mit Change Request{1}, Validierung PRO/REP{3}, Dokument zur Verifizierung{2}, Überprüfung und Verlängerung{2}, Spec.Sheet{2}, CoA (sofern nicht LIMS){2}, Änderungen Tg4.B07{5}, OOS (Plan/Bericht){3}, Transfer PRO/REP{3}, Studie PRO/REP{3}, Studie ohne Plan{2}, Anderes{2}
Quick filter = Date, Typ

If i choose an Entry from the "Typ" Quick Filter it shows me that there are no entries in the logbook but I'm shure that there are entries. 

Can you please help? I cannot see what's wrong.

Best Regards

Michael

 

  66984   Fri Jan 14 00:07:01 2011 Entry JacekKdoctor99@poczta.onet.plBug reportAll2.8.0New entries are not visible from other logbooks based on the same logbook dir through Subdir

Hi,

I have two logbooks based on the same data directory through "Subdir" option and when I add new entry in one logbook, then that entry is not visible in other logbook.

I suppose it is a bug in el_submit function, where I think the new message should be added to message index of every logbook based on the same data directory as the one, where the message was physically created. 

There is a piece of code, which I think should do this automatically

/* if other logbook has same index, update pointers */

but it seems the other logbooks does not have the same index. 

I'm new to elog and the sources are also new to me, so my guess to the ground of the problem may be wrong.

Let me know is this bug possible to fix in near future.

 

Best regards,

Jacek

  66983   Thu Jan 13 10:07:17 2011 Warning Andreas Luedekeandreas.luedeke@psi.chBug reportAll2.8.0-2313Found some spelling errors in eloglang.german
corrected file is attached
  66982   Sun Jan 9 07:04:00 2011 Agree Behdad Dbehdad@inbox.comQuestionWindows2.8Re: Multiple Insances of eLog on the same machine

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Behdad D wrote:

Hello,

Is it possible to run multiple instance of elog on the same windows box where each instance listens on a different port?

Thanks.

Behdad.

Sure. Just start with one subdirectory for each instance with a separate elogd.cfg file, where you specify a different port. Note however that there is also the concept of "top groups" (see documentation) which lets a single instance of elog look like several independent installations. 

 

Great. Thanks Stefan. 

I also am already using the top groups. This is just to totally separate my work and home elog.....I have to admit I am really an elog addict. 

This elog and the idea behind it is absolutely  brilliant. Very useful, easy to maintain, migrate, configure, easy to use, versatile, etc...  Good on you all.

Cheers,

Behdad.

  66981   Fri Jan 7 08:37:49 2011 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionWindows2.8Re: Multiple Insances of eLog on the same machine

Behdad D wrote:

Hello,

Is it possible to run multiple instance of elog on the same windows box where each instance listens on a different port?

Thanks.

Behdad.

Sure. Just start with one subdirectory for each instance with a separate elogd.cfg file, where you specify a different port. Note however that there is also the concept of "top groups" (see documentation) which lets a single instance of elog look like several independent installations. 

  66980   Fri Jan 7 05:45:41 2011 Question Behdad Dbehdad@inbox.comQuestionWindows2.8Multiple Insances of eLog on the same machine

Hello,

Is it possible to run multiple instance of elog on the same windows box where each instance listens on a different port?

Thanks.

Behdad.

  66979   Thu Dec 23 10:42:05 2010 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux2.8Re: how to retrieve attachment on execute new

Zbigniew Reszela wrote:


Hello Stefan,

first of all thanks for quick response.

However I encountered another problem, but to explain it well I need to tell you more what actually I want to do with these substitutions. 

So I would like to have a python script which on add new entry will create a new entry in another logbook with the same data (Only for certain attributes' values). That's why I need attachments.

These substitutions will be used as command line arguments of the script.

Since I started using $attachments, all the substitutions used before it, are passed twice? Without using $attachments substitution, it works fine - they are passed only once.

Furthermore I tested it without script, just passing them to a text file, and it seems that it really doesn't work well. Could you check that?

-------------------

Execute new = echo $message id '$long_name' '$System' '$Equipment' '$Subject' '$text' > /tmp/zzz_elog.log             WORKS GOOD

Execute new = echo $message id '$long_name' '$System' '$Equipment' '$Subject' '$text'  $attachments> /tmp/zzz_elog.log            DOESN'T WORK GOOD

------------------

Thank you a lot in advance.

 

Thanks for reporting this bug. I fixed this in SVN revision  2348.

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 352, 353, 354 ... 804, 805, 806   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6