> Like many educational institutions we get "educational certificates" that are chain certificates..
>  
> only shows: 
> 
> CONNECTED(00000003)
> 25523:error:14077410:SSL routines:SSL23_GET_SERVER_HELLO:sslv3 alert handshake failure:s23_clnt.c:562:
> 
> What do I do wrong?
> 

After reading the OpenSSL Documentation:

The certificates must be in PEM format and must be sorted starting with the subject's certificate (actual client or
server certificate), followed by intermediate CA certificates if applicable, and ending at the highest level (root) CA.

The chain.crt has to be of the following format:

HOST CERTIFICATE
INTERMEDIATE CERTIFICATE
ROOT CERTIFICATE

Then it is working w/o problems

GS

* Withdrawn *

The HTML layout produced by elogd is horrendous to deal with programmatically; I give up.

Hi,

I'm writing a greasemonkey script to slightly alter the look of the pages served by the ELOG server.  One difficulty that I'm struggling with is how to identify what type of page ELOG has created.  While I have several methods to determine the page type, such as a log entry vs. log entries summary, the solutions are not straight forward and not clean.  As far as I tell, there's no specific identification in HTML document currently that describes and identifies the type of page being served by the ELOG server.

So, I'm requesting that the pages created by ELOG be identified in some fashion with the META element, such as:

    <meta name="description" content="elog log entry" />

or

    <meta name="description" content="elog log summary" />

or even using the keywords attribute:

    <meta name="keywords" content="elog log summary" />

Thanks!

Hi,

Here is what happens (I think) if E-log encounters a full file system where it keeps the user authorization file:

1. When a user connects, E-log will make a backup of the file. The backup will be corrupt since the file system is full.

2. E-log will modify the contents of the original file, and write it back. The file will be corrupt since the file system is full.

3. Now, both the backup and the normal file are corrupt and you cannot log on, until someone cleans up the file system and restores a valid copy of the file.

Would it be possible to fix this ? Like abort if step 1 is not successful. And restore the backup file if step 2 is not successful.

Thanks a lot for you help 

Soren

Hi,

I use the following attribute definition:

Options <attribute> = <list> 

However, I am being limited by the list length limit of 100. I have 103 items, but I only see 100.

Could the limit be extended (to 200 for instance) ?

Thanks a lot for your help

Soren

 Trust me, I don't want them getting old data either.. that would be a nightmare..

of course, the little voice at the back of my head (note, not IN the back of my head) has offered up this tidbit for you to consider.

Stefan, would it be possible to make the following change so that the document is not cached and at the same time it is possible to save it.

The change would entail replacing the "Pragma: no-cache" directive with an "Expires: " <HTTP-date> where <HTTP-date> is the same as Date header value. Please see section 14.21 of http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec14.html

Hopefully there are no other side effects to this change.

I can easily remove the "no-cache" from the header, but as I wrote you, people can then shoot themselves into the foot by getting an old document, and I guess they become even less happy then. So you tell me which way you prefer. 

Allow HTML = 1

 Ah, now this is humorous, when the client first came to me, that was almost exactly the work around I gave him, open it, CTRL-A to highlight it all, CTRL-C to copy it, Move to the excel spreadsheet, CTRL-V to paste it into Excel. Select Data, Text to Columns, and you have an Excel Spreadsheet.   They wanted me to post the change in function anyway, though I told Vamsi, "just watch, someone will post the same workaround that I already gave to the clients".  So you see why I find it amusing.  I would say Great Minds Think Alike, but that would be giving myself a bit too much credit (grin).  First, thank you for proving me right on my prediction and if you should happen to make a change that would get around this SSL change in behavior, it would make a group of manufacturing types that are not quite as comfortable with computers as we are, very happy.   Please let us know.