ELOG Forum

> > Hi Stefan,
> > 
> > I don't know if anyone else would be interested or need this...
> > 
> > If you have an Roption, and it is not required (maybe...) or have a preset attribute, it is possible to make an
> > entry and have replies without any of the attributes in that Roption being selected.
> > 
> > However, once an attribute in that Roption has been selected, it is not possible to go back (editing) to the
> > condition before one was selected on that entry (so far as I can tell).  
> > 
> > Is a way of cancelling all the possible attributes in an Roption practical?  Would others want it?  It is
> > possible with options, as there is a "please select" which can be used to cancel whichever attribute in the
> > option that has been selected.
> > 
> > Regards,  David
> 
> The easiest to achieve this is to define another option. Assume you have the three options
> 
> One, Two, Three
> 
> and you want to "unselect" them. So just add a fourth option like
> 
> Unspecified, One, Two, Three
> 
> so if you do not want any of the "One, Two, Three", just click on "Unspecified" and you get what you want.

This is sort of what I do now, I just wondered if there was a way of clearing that would leave the field completely
blank in the YYMMDDa.log file.

Thanks.

66431

Thu Jul 2 10:04:13 2009

Re: Cancelling an Roption selection in Edit.

> Hi Stefan,
> 
> I don't know if anyone else would be interested or need this...
> 
> If you have an Roption, and it is not required (maybe...) or have a preset attribute, it is possible to make an
> entry and have replies without any of the attributes in that Roption being selected.
> 
> However, once an attribute in that Roption has been selected, it is not possible to go back (editing) to the
> condition before one was selected on that entry (so far as I can tell).  
> 
> Is a way of cancelling all the possible attributes in an Roption practical?  Would others want it?  It is
> possible with options, as there is a "please select" which can be used to cancel whichever attribute in the
> option that has been selected.
> 
> Regards,  David

The easiest to achieve this is to define another option. Assume you have the three options

One, Two, Three

and you want to "unselect" them. So just add a fourth option like

Unspecified, One, Two, Three

so if you do not want any of the "One, Two, Three", just click on "Unspecified" and you get what you want.

66430

Thu Jul 2 09:39:40 2009

David Pilgram

David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk

Question

Linux

2.7.6-2226

Cancelling an Roption selection in Edit.

Hi Stefan,

I don't know if anyone else would be interested or need this...

If you have an Roption, and it is not required (maybe...) or have a preset attribute, it is possible to make an
entry and have replies without any of the attributes in that Roption being selected.

However, once an attribute in that Roption has been selected, it is not possible to go back (editing) to the
condition before one was selected on that entry (so far as I can tell).  

Is a way of cancelling all the possible attributes in an Roption practical?  Would others want it?  It is
possible with options, as there is a "please select" which can be used to cancel whichever attribute in the
option that has been selected.

Regards,  David

66429

Thu Jul 2 08:36:57 2009

Re: Checks on datetime seconds field generate warning in IE7

Richard Stamper wrote:

When adding a log entry containing a datetime field using the IE7 browser a Javascript warning is displayed - see the attachment. This is due to a change in the naming of the "seconds" field of a datetime entry (made in version 2143) not being propagated to the code that generates the Javascript that checks the supplied values.

Suggested patch follows.

Change "s%d" to "c%d" in lines 9675 and 9678.

Showing lines 9675-9680 below, change from:

               rsprintf(" if (document.form1.s%d.value == \"\") {\n", i);
               sprintf(str, loc("Please enter second for attribute '%s'"), attr_list[i]);
               rsprintf("    alert(\"%s\");\n", str);
               rsprintf("    document.form1.s%d.focus();\n", i);
               rsprintf("    return false;\n");
               rsprintf(" }\n");

to:

               rsprintf(" if (document.form1.c%d.value == \"\") {\n", i);
               sprintf(str, loc("Please enter second for attribute '%s'"), attr_list[i]);
               rsprintf("    alert(\"%s\");\n", str);
               rsprintf("    document.form1.c%d.focus();\n", i);
               rsprintf("    return false;\n");
               rsprintf(" }\n");

Regards,

Richard Stamper

This is absolutely correct, even the right fix. I put that into the distribution. Thanks a lot.

66428

Wed Jul 1 17:00:30 2009

Checks on datetime seconds field generate warning in IE7

Suggested patch follows.

Change "s%d" to "c%d" in lines 9675 and 9678.

Showing lines 9675-9680 below, change from:

to:

Regards,

Richard Stamper

Attachment 1: Javascript_warning.jpg

66427

Fri Jun 26 17:04:23 2009

Re: attached picture size changed

Stefan Ritt wrote:

weiluo wrote:

Hello everyone.
Here I found a problem recently with attaching screen-shot to the elog.
I am using "elog -f xxx/xxx.gif" to make elog entry. Recently I found my attached pictures were scaled to the half of the original size horizontally appearing in the log entry, the other half of the picture was filled with black. I need to click it once to magnify the picture to see it.
Does anyone know how to solve this problem? It bugs me a lot.

By the way, I saw some pictures were produced with the name "xxx.gif.png" in the logbook directory.
Thanks, and one of the modified picture is attached.

When you submit a picture, elogd calls the ImageMagick package to generate a thumbnail out of it, therefore you get the "xxx.gif.png" file (which represents the thumbnail). If you create your GIF images with the ROOT package, ImageMagick will give problems because ROOT does not use standard GIF encoding, therefor the black border on your pictures. You can turn off the thumbnail generation completely by specifying

Thumbnail size = 0

in the configuration file. This option was just introduced recently, so please update to SVN revision 2227 for this option to work.

Thanks a lot for the detailed explanation! It works!

66426

Fri Jun 26 14:34:58 2009

Steve Williamson

StephenWilliamson@Barnsley.gov.uk

Request

Linux

2.7.6

Re: Formatting list page data

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Williamson wrote:

Thanks for a great piece of software - it does so much and is (mostly) so simple to use. However, I do have a suggestion that (for me, at least) would make it even better -

I use elog for a variety of logging tasks but find that, because I want to see as complete a summary as possible, the list page can get very crowded with longer fields wrapping over several lines. I would like to have more control over the way attributes are displayed here. Specifically, being able to truncate data (e.g. to show just the first n characters of a description), being able to select a substring (e.g. displaying characters before the '@' character to remove the domain from an email address or displaying characters after the space to remove the day from a date in ddd dd/mm/yy format) and being able to concatenate fields (e.g. to show a reference in a single cell as "Incident 1234" by joining call type and call reference attributes).

regards

Steve

Something along these lines is however not implemented (and hard to do). The only chance you have is to export your data into a spreadsheet and do the reformatting/report generation there.

Thanks for looking at the suggestion - it was only a 'nice to have', whereas elog is an essential!

regards

Goto page Previous 1, 2, 3 ... 422, 423, 424 ... 805, 806, 807 Next

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6