Re: CKeditor Settings Cant Be Changed , posted by Antonio Bulgheroni on Thu Feb 2 10:23:45 2023
|
It means that you could replace the currently distributed CKeditor with a fresh vanilla installation of CKeditor?
| James Smallcombe wrote: |
|
So it was just a clearing cache issue. elogd was telling the browser to use/not use CKeditor based on the aformentioned, and browser was then using the cached version. Fixed now.
And FYI for anyone who reads this when trying to modify CKeditor themselves, it seems elog needs the iFrame Editing Area plugin included.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
elogd checks for the "scripts/ckeditor/ckeditor.js" file to detect the presence of CKeditor.
| James Smallcombe wrote: |
|
I wanted to change some CKeditor settings so tried modifying elog/scripts/ckeditor to no avail.
I wiped elog/scripts/ and dropped a fresh download of CKeditor4, with only the basic extensions. But when I open the elog it still shows the full toolbar, with elog default style and with all extensions operational.
If I leave elog/scripts empty, I get "CKeditor NOT detected" when starting elogd and the HTML option is empty and shows nothing, all as expected.
Does anyone understand this? Is there some CKeditor configuration file elog is defering to that I've overlooked? I have tried system wide seaches just in case.
|
|
|
|
|
Re: CKeditor Settings Cant Be Changed , posted by James Smallcombe on Thu Feb 2 10:35:38 2023
|
Yes replacing the CKeditor folder with a vanila download works without issue, provided you clean the cache.
For what I originally wanted to do (modifiying the toolbar) I could have just run elog/scripts/ckeditor/samples/toolbarconfigurator/index.html and edited the config file, but a clean cache is needed (on Chrome, Firefox and Edge).
| Antonio Bulgheroni wrote: |
|
It means that you could replace the currently distributed CKeditor with a fresh vanilla installation of CKeditor?
| James Smallcombe wrote: |
|
So it was just a clearing cache issue. elogd was telling the browser to use/not use CKeditor based on the aformentioned, and browser was then using the cached version. Fixed now.
And FYI for anyone who reads this when trying to modify CKeditor themselves, it seems elog needs the iFrame Editing Area plugin included.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
elogd checks for the "scripts/ckeditor/ckeditor.js" file to detect the presence of CKeditor.
| James Smallcombe wrote: |
|
I wanted to change some CKeditor settings so tried modifying elog/scripts/ckeditor to no avail.
I wiped elog/scripts/ and dropped a fresh download of CKeditor4, with only the basic extensions. But when I open the elog it still shows the full toolbar, with elog default style and with all extensions operational.
If I leave elog/scripts empty, I get "CKeditor NOT detected" when starting elogd and the HTML option is empty and shows nothing, all as expected.
Does anyone understand this? Is there some CKeditor configuration file elog is defering to that I've overlooked? I have tried system wide seaches just in case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: Installing Elog on Linux Oracle 9 and missing libssl.so.10, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Fri Feb 3 15:51:07 2023
|
Hi Daniel,
The RPM has been build for EL7 so SSL share libs should be different with the one provided by EL9. :-)
Try to rebuild from tarball source with enclosed buildrpm script (or with elog srpms if you find any : rpm -i elog*.src.rpm && vim ~/rpmbuild/SPEC/elog.spec # update build options as SSL/LDAP/PAM... && rpmbuild -bb ~/rpmbuild/SPEC/elog.spec ).
Gûd luck
| Daniel Sajdyk wrote: |
|
Hello,
I tried to install Elog 3.1.4 from rpm on Oracle Linux 9 with command:
sudo dnf localinstall elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64.rpm
But I got error:
Last metadata expiration check: 0:08:06 ago on Thu 02 Feb 2023 10:35:13 CET.
Error:
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides libssl.so.10()(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
- nothing provides libssl.so.10(libssl.so.10)(64bit) needed by elog-3.1.4-3.el7.x86_64
(try to add '--skip-broken' to skip uninstallable packages or '--nobest' to use not only best candidate packages)
Using dnf I installed libssl.so.11 (cannot find version 10) and it doesn't help. So my question is: can I use one of proposes by dnf solution as:
- --skip-broken
- --nobest
Does Elog will work stabilityy after that?
Best Regards
|
|
|
Re: New elog version 3.1.5, posted by Antonio Bulgheroni on Fri Feb 3 20:26:46 2023
|
Looking forward to the windows installer.
Thanks a lot and keep up the good work!
cheers,
toto
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
A new version 3.1.5 of elog has been released with all accumulated fixes over the past actually few years. I made a tar file, a RPM, but I could not compile yet a windows version.
https://elog.psi.ch/elog/download.html
Best,
Stefan
|
|
|
Re: 3.1.5 - Mass edit bug + Wrong version, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 7 16:21:37 2023
|
I checked and found that the bug which removed the main text was there since the beginning, but it's only triggered if you switch elog to French, it doesn't happen in the English version. I changed a bit the text processing so now it should work also in the French version.
I also changed the version number which is shown at the bottom to 3.1.5.
Stefan |
|
Re: 3.1.5 - Mass edit bug + Wrong version, posted by Cryptage on Tue Feb 7 17:31:20 2023
|
Thanks for your prompt help.
It looks good for text but I still have problem with "select" function (even in English).
If I use "select" menu :
- When multiple values are selected it indicates "only user - keep original values - can edit" (freshly created).
- When a single value is selected, it indicates "only user XXX can edit" where XXX is my truncated name (the first 4 letters).
After editing in with admin account the author is now my truncated name :
If I want to edit a single entry (without select menu) it works perfectly.
Thanks.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
I checked and found that the bug which removed the main text was there since the beginning, but it's only triggered if you switch elog to French, it doesn't happen in the English version. I changed a bit the text processing so now it should work also in the French version.
I also changed the version number which is shown at the bottom to 3.1.5.
Stefan
|
|
|
Re: 3.1.5 - Mass edit bug + Wrong version, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 7 20:45:31 2023
|
If it works with a simple edit, then why don't you use that one to edit individual values. I checked and version 3.1.4 had already the same problem, so it was not newly introduced. I would have to invest a couple of hours to fix this issue correcly, which I simply don't have right now. |
|
Re: 3.1.5 - Mass edit bug + Wrong version, posted by Cryptage on Wed Feb 8 10:05:03 2023
|
Thanks !
Sometime I need to edit multiple values to add a new choice.
By exemple, if I add a new column "status" (open, closed...) , it's mandatory to use select menu to add the new value to existent entries.
With a lot of lines it's not possible to edit one by one.
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
If it works with a simple edit, then why don't you use that one to edit individual values. I checked and version 3.1.4 had already the same problem, so it was not newly introduced. I would have to invest a couple of hours to fix this issue correcly, which I simply don't have right now.
|
|