Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries, posted by Chris Rasmussen on Sat May 5 11:22:50 2018 
|
Hi Andreas, I'm working on the same experiment as Joseph who submitted the bug report.
You are right, IDs greater than 10^5 are created no problem. The issue is with the internal elog link, in this case of the form elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX
The link generated uses only the first 5 digits of the message ID, and therefore links to the wrong message. In the two attachments you can see our sequencer |
|
Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat May 5 20:55:23 2018
|
Well, in my example the ID link worked just fine.
There could be a string length limitation, but it could be as well the way you are creating the ID that is the source of the problem: I would
need the part of your elogd.cfg that defines how you format your ID in order to try to reproduce your problem. |
|
Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 7 14:24:18 2018
|
As Andreas said we have to reproduce the problem. What is special in your case is the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX.
This is non-standard and must be created through your configuration of elog or by an external script. I just guess that you have something like
Preset ID = elog:SequencerEvents/##### |
|
Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries, posted by Chris Rasmussen on Mon May 7 18:10:20 2018
|
ah yes, that was a helpful clue. Our elogd.cfg file led me to a .js file which redefines the ID to the elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX
format and it indeed had a silly hard coded length of that string.
Since I am pretty sure this is our code, I think it is safe to say that this is not a bug in the elog |
Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries, posted by Joseph McKenna on Tue May 8 16:17:28 2018
|
Thank you all for your kind responses. Please consider this thread resolved: no bug in elog
Chris
Rasmussen wrote:
ah yes, that was a helpful clue. Our elogd.cfg file led me to a |
about shiftcheck, posted by Xuan Wu on Tue May 15 04:41:23 2018
|
Hi all,
I try to implement a shift check list for our facility. The attributes called "a1, a2, b1, b2 etc" are used in original shiftcheck.html，
However, we would like to use "1.1, 1.2, 2.1, 2.2 etc". So I try to change the name of checkbox in shiftcheck.html and the attributes in |
|
Re: about shiftcheck, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue May 15 10:35:32 2018
|
An attribute is similar to a variable. Do you know any programming language that allows to start a variable with a digit? I don't.
The solution is very obvious: start your attributes with a letter.
Cheers, Andreas |
|
Re: about shiftcheck, posted by Xuan Wu on Wed May 16 02:20:24 2018
|
That's true. Thanks for your explanation.
Cheers, Xuan
Andreas |