Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 582 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Email Categorydown OS ELOG Version Subject
  73   Mon Jul 15 14:09:30 2002 Warning Joeri Mastopjoeri.mastop@knmi.nlBug report  Port specification with -p fails under RedHat Linux (2.0.4-1)
Hello,

I noticed a strange behaviour with Elog 2.0.4 (i386 RPM) in Linux (RH 7.2). 
I started Elog out-of-the-box with portnumber 888 ('sbin/elogd -p 888').

It runs just fine, but appears to listen to port 8080, the default! It 
looks like the -p option on the command-line is ignored.

Anyone seen similar problems? 

Joeri
  76   Wed Jul 17 14:53:18 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report  Re: Reverse sort, threaded display fails when there is only 1 entry in logbook
> 
> 
> This is not a serious bug...but when the global settings are as follows
> 
> [global]
> Display mode = threaded
> Reverse sort = 1
> 
> all logbooks with only a single entry produce the wrong URL on 
> clicking "last 10"
> 
> The URL produced is http://localhost:8080/LogbookName/0
> instead of http://localhost:8080/LogbookName/1
> 
> Ravi

This question has been answered in elog:55 .
  82   Wed Jul 24 16:44:44 2002 Question Christian KorschanChristian.Korschan@CTBTO.ORGBug report  elog-2.0.5 core dumps under Solaris
Just compiled elog-2.0.5 under Solaris 8 and 9  without any warnings/errors
but the elogd binary just core dumps:

# /opt/ELOG/bin/elogd -c /opt/ELOG/elogd.cfg 
Indexing logbook "demo"...
Bus Error (core dumped)

.. tracing elogd shows:

[ lines snipped ]
2964:   brk(0x005B8A68)                                 = 0
2964:   ioctl(1, TCGETA, 0xFFBEE6BC)                    = 0
Indexing logbook "demo"...
2964:   write(1, " I n d e x i n g   l o g".., 27)      = 27
2964:       Incurred fault #5, FLTACCESS  %pc = 0x000164C0
2964:         siginfo: SIGBUS BUS_ADRALN addr=0x2F757372
2964:       Received signal #10, SIGBUS [default]
2964:         siginfo: SIGBUS BUS_ADRALN addr=0x2F757372
2964:           *** process killed ***
#

... any glue ?
  84   Wed Jul 24 17:29:00 2002 Reply Christian KorschanChristian.Korschan@CTBTO.ORGBug report  Re: Compiling elog 2.0.4 on Solaris
> > Comiling elogd 2.0.4 under Solaris obviously fails with
> > 
> > gcc  -o elog elog.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > gcc  -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
> > elogd.c: In function `ss_file_find':
> > elogd.c:1372: `alphasort' undeclared (first use in this function)
> > elogd.c:1372: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
> > elogd.c:1372: for each function it appears in.)
> > make: *** [elogd] Error 1
> > 
> > because alphasort is an ucb'ism which does not exist under SYSV
> > 
> > ... not very portable :-(
> 
> I was not aware of this. Actually, I don't need 'alphasort' so I removed it 
> from the source. The update is at
> 
> http://midas.psi.ch/cgi-bin/cvsweb/elog/elogd.c
> 
> Please give it a try.

ok - i just continued with 2.0.5, but apparently it still has an UCB'ism
(scandir) that does not work under SYSV:

$ make
gcc -g -o elogd elogd.c -lsocket -lnsl
Undefined                       first referenced
 symbol                             in file
scandir                             /tmp/ccy0Z3iV.o
ld: fatal: Symbol referencing errors. No output written to elogd
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [elogd] Error 1
$ egrep scandir elogd.c
  n = scandir(path, &namelist, NULL, NULL);
$ 
  85   Thu Jul 25 19:17:13 2002 Warning Momsheikh25@hotmail.comBug report  elogd.cfg cannot be saved
Hello,
    In the newest version of eLog, I was having trouble saving the 
configurations once I change them through the web interface.  I can change 
them and save them fine if I do it in notepad; but that way you have to 
restart the elogd server.  I think this is a bug on the new version unless 
I am doing something wrong.  Also I was wondering if you were going to add 
any of the wish list items on version 2.0.6 (Conditional attributes seems 
to have the most votes and would be an extremely helpful feature!! :-).  
Thank You.

Mo.
  92   Wed Aug 7 15:43:28 2002 Question Stefan Siegelssiegel@lucent.comBug report  problem with required attributes
When an entry is submitted with an required attribute missing one gets to 
the resubmit page. When you the click your browsers back button all 
previously filled attribute field are blank.

Is there a workaround to get the old text back?

used versions:
Elog 2.0.5
Netscape 4.76

Best regards,

Stefan
  93   Wed Aug 7 15:51:18 2002 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug report  Re: problem with required attributes
> When an entry is submitted with an required attribute missing one gets to 
> the resubmit page. When you the click your browsers back button all 
> previously filled attribute field are blank.
> 
> Is there a workaround to get the old text back?
> 
> used versions:
> Elog 2.0.5
> Netscape 4.76
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Stefan

This problem must be specific to NS 4.76, I don't have it on IE, NS 6, Mozilla
1, Opera etc. Maybe you should upgrade. Anybody else made this observation? 
  101   Mon Aug 12 11:01:51 2002 Warning Stefan Siegelssiegel@lucent.comBug report  Error while trying to change password (elogd 2.1.0)
When logging in with a username and password; then trying to logout or 
change password one gets the following message:

Error: Parameter value too big. Please increase VALUE_SIZE and recompile 
elogd ; Please use your browser's back button to go back 

(up to now I have not yet tried to recompile - may be it works then)

Regards,

Stefan
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6