ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
69022
|
Mon Oct 7 08:54:32 2019 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Cannot connect to server of Gmail SMTP | Gmail uses a type of SMTP authentication which is currently not supported by elog. It's however on the todo list.
Stefan
Kevin Wang wrote: |
Hi all,
When I tried to set SMTP server of Gmail in the global configuration file, I get the message "Error sending Email via <i>"smtp.gmail.com"</i>: Cannot connect to server" after I tried to receive the Email notification. Is there anyone gives help to solve this issue?
Thanks!
Kevin
|
|
69023
|
Tue Oct 8 05:42:56 2019 |
| Kevin Wang | wangkl1020@gmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Cannot connect to server of Gmail SMTP | Hi Stefan,
Thank you very much for your reply. So which SMTP type can I use now? Is outlook OK?
Kevin
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Gmail uses a type of SMTP authentication which is currently not supported by elog. It's however on the todo list.
Stefan
Kevin Wang wrote: |
Hi all,
When I tried to set SMTP server of Gmail in the global configuration file, I get the message "Error sending Email via <i>"smtp.gmail.com"</i>: Cannot connect to server" after I tried to receive the Email notification. Is there anyone gives help to solve this issue?
Thanks!
Kevin
|
|
|
69024
|
Tue Oct 8 06:47:27 2019 |
| John | secondcomingtechnologies@fastmail.com | Question | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Cannot connect to server of Gmail SMTP | This is a local issue on your network, if you have a mail server setup. SMTP is not handled directly by Elog and neither is any other mail protocal. Elog just sends the requested email to your server for processing to the recipients afaict. And whatever server (or service) you use to handle email sending needs to be able to accept them from your mail server. So after verifying which ones you want to use; (like OutLook, or gmail, or whatever), then have your local email server set up to work with them. You can prol have a 3rd party do this was well (instead of your own local one) but then they would STILL need to be able to work with whatever guidlines the actual sender (gmail, hotmail..) requires to have mail sent. Email is a lonnng trail of different providers, servers, and other actors..
Halvy
Kevin Wang wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
Thank you very much for your reply. So which SMTP type can I use now? Is outlook OK?
Kevin
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Gmail uses a type of SMTP authentication which is currently not supported by elog. It's however on the todo list.
Stefan
Kevin Wang wrote: |
Hi all,
When I tried to set SMTP server of Gmail in the global configuration file, I get the message "Error sending Email via <i>"smtp.gmail.com"</i>: Cannot connect to server" after I tried to receive the Email notification. Is there anyone gives help to solve this issue?
Thanks!
Kevin
|
|
|
|
66911
|
Mon Sep 20 14:54:21 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | Linux | 2.8.0 | Re: Cannot bind to port 8080 |
marco meneghelli wrote: |
good morning,
I have installed elog 2.8.0 from terminal but when I type
elogd -p 80
or simply
elogd
the system tells me
Cannot bind to port 8080
Can someone help me?
Thanks
Marco M
|
Under linux, only the "root" user can start programs on ports below 1024. If you get problems binding to ports above 1024 (such as 8080) it means that some other program uses already that port. You can check what is running usually with
netstat -l -p
|
66431
|
Thu Jul 2 10:04:13 2009 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.6-2226 | Re: Cancelling an Roption selection in Edit. | > Hi Stefan,
>
> I don't know if anyone else would be interested or need this...
>
> If you have an Roption, and it is not required (maybe...) or have a preset attribute, it is possible to make an
> entry and have replies without any of the attributes in that Roption being selected.
>
> However, once an attribute in that Roption has been selected, it is not possible to go back (editing) to the
> condition before one was selected on that entry (so far as I can tell).
>
> Is a way of cancelling all the possible attributes in an Roption practical? Would others want it? It is
> possible with options, as there is a "please select" which can be used to cancel whichever attribute in the
> option that has been selected.
>
> Regards, David
The easiest to achieve this is to define another option. Assume you have the three options
One, Two, Three
and you want to "unselect" them. So just add a fourth option like
Unspecified, One, Two, Three
so if you do not want any of the "One, Two, Three", just click on "Unspecified" and you get what you want. |
66432
|
Thu Jul 2 11:33:48 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.6-2226 | Re: Cancelling an Roption selection in Edit. | > > Hi Stefan,
> >
> > I don't know if anyone else would be interested or need this...
> >
> > If you have an Roption, and it is not required (maybe...) or have a preset attribute, it is possible to make an
> > entry and have replies without any of the attributes in that Roption being selected.
> >
> > However, once an attribute in that Roption has been selected, it is not possible to go back (editing) to the
> > condition before one was selected on that entry (so far as I can tell).
> >
> > Is a way of cancelling all the possible attributes in an Roption practical? Would others want it? It is
> > possible with options, as there is a "please select" which can be used to cancel whichever attribute in the
> > option that has been selected.
> >
> > Regards, David
>
> The easiest to achieve this is to define another option. Assume you have the three options
>
> One, Two, Three
>
> and you want to "unselect" them. So just add a fourth option like
>
> Unspecified, One, Two, Three
>
> so if you do not want any of the "One, Two, Three", just click on "Unspecified" and you get what you want.
This is sort of what I do now, I just wondered if there was a way of clearing that would leave the field completely
blank in the YYMMDDa.log file.
Thanks. |
68459
|
Wed Nov 16 14:01:18 2016 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | 3.1.2 | Re: Cancel button missing when editing an entry | The problem is that the elog database does not allow for a copy of an entry before you make modifications (and therefore get a "draft"). This is actually very simila to other note taking programs. I use Evernote, which constantly synchronizes between devices, and there I also cannot go back to the version before I started making modification. What one would need is a version system (and Evernote has one), so you can go back to the previous verison, the pre-previous version and so on. But this requires a complete redesign of the elog database.
A quick and dirty solution would be to store the origianal entry inside the browser (using JavaScript). You could then restore the initial version with a "cancel" button. But this mechanism relies then on the browser. If you just leave the page, there is no way the browser can put back the old version.
Stefan
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
If I edit an old entry, and do some mistake while editing, then there is currently no way to savely discard the changes.
The problem is that the entry will become a draft: if I close the window without saving, then the whole entry is gone: it will be converted into a draft entry. But the draft does contain my changes, it is not the originally saved entry!
The draft mechanism should keep a copy of the entry before I opened it in edit mode, and allow to go back to that copy. The edit form has currently the buttons "Submit", "Save", "Preview" and "Delete"; it should have in addition the button "Cancel", that just closes the edit window without saving the entry and even deleting the draft that was saved while the entry was modified. This should bring you back to the previous list view.
Is anyone out there in favour of this change?
|
|
68460
|
Wed Nov 16 17:12:40 2016 |
| Grant Jeffcote | grant@jeffcote.org | Request | All | 3.1.2 | Re: Cancel button missing when editing an entry | Andreas,
Doesn't using the Save Drafts = 0 option result in the old 'Back' button returning (replacing the Delete option) meaning you can revert back to your old (unmodified) version without saving, sure it doesn't save a draft but I'd rather be able to return back and lose the changes I didn't want then mess up an old entry, I guess the back button on the browser could also do what you want?
The issue I had was that entries were being deleted accidently by persons other than those that created them, I reduced the edit time to try and mitigate it but ended up going back to what we had in Ver 2.9.2, a 'Back' button.
Grant
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
The problem is that the elog database does not allow for a copy of an entry before you make modifications (and therefore get a "draft"). This is actually very simila to other note taking programs. I use Evernote, which constantly synchronizes between devices, and there I also cannot go back to the version before I started making modification. What one would need is a version system (and Evernote has one), so you can go back to the previous verison, the pre-previous version and so on. But this requires a complete redesign of the elog database.
A quick and dirty solution would be to store the origianal entry inside the browser (using JavaScript). You could then restore the initial version with a "cancel" button. But this mechanism relies then on the browser. If you just leave the page, there is no way the browser can put back the old version.
Stefan
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
If I edit an old entry, and do some mistake while editing, then there is currently no way to savely discard the changes.
The problem is that the entry will become a draft: if I close the window without saving, then the whole entry is gone: it will be converted into a draft entry. But the draft does contain my changes, it is not the originally saved entry!
The draft mechanism should keep a copy of the entry before I opened it in edit mode, and allow to go back to that copy. The edit form has currently the buttons "Submit", "Save", "Preview" and "Delete"; it should have in addition the button "Cancel", that just closes the edit window without saving the entry and even deleting the draft that was saved while the entry was modified. This should bring you back to the previous list view.
Is anyone out there in favour of this change?
|
|
|
|