Possible bug in elogd execute_shell, posted by Nigel Warr on Fri Feb 26 08:38:06 2016
|
I was just playing around with gcc6's new feature for warning about misleading indentation (which can often hide real bugs) and I think it found one in elog-3.1.1-1 at src/elogd.c:22538. Here there is an if statement, which looks as though it should be inside a loop, but it isn't. The code is:
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ATTACHMENTS; i++)
generate_subdir_name(att_file[i], subdir, sizeof(subdir));
if (att_file[i][0] && strlen(shell_cmd) + strlen(lbs->data_dir) + strl$
< sizeof(shell_cmd) + 1) {
strcpy(p, "\"");
strcat(p, lbs->data_dir);
strlcat(str, subdir, sizeof(str));
strlcpy(str, att_file[i], sizeof(str));
str_escape(str, sizeof(str));
strcat(p, str);
strcat(p, "\" ");
p += strlen(p);
}
and the if statment is accessing the loop variable i but it is actually outside the loop. Presumably, there should be some more curly brackets here. gcc6 gave the warning:
src/elogd.c: In function ‘execute_shell’:
src/elogd.c:22538:10: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
if (att_file[i][0] && strlen(shell_cmd) + strlen(lbs->data_dir) + strlen(subdir) + strlen(att_file[i])
^~
src/elogd.c:22536:7: note: ...this ‘for’ clause, but it is not
for (i = 0; i < MAX_ATTACHMENTS; i++)
^~~
|
Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ?, posted by Maikolk Kein on Mon Jan 26 10:30:40 2015
|
Hi all !!!
i have just updated and 2.9.2-1 elog instance, and i have problems with the kerberos configuration.
I was surprised to see on the logs, that the 3.0 daemon was refusing to start because the system
config has kerberos listed as an authentication method. I saw on the logs that the current daemon
didnt have kerberos support compiled in.
Ive seen that there is ldap support, but couldnt find anything about configuring this auth sytem, does
amnyone have any example i could check ?
Did i have to use a patched version ? or compile it on my own ?
Regards |
Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Jan 26 15:04:38 2015
|
Hi Maikolk,
I have elogd 3.0 running with kerberos: I had no problems with that.
Maybe you forgot to change the Makefile before compiling?
Uncomment line 28 to:
# flag for Kerberos support, please turn on if you need Kerberos
USE_KRB5 = 1
and then "make clean" and "make install" (or "make update").
Regards, Andreas
Maikolk Kein wrote: |
Hi all !!!
i have just updated and 2.9.2-1 elog instance, and i have problems with the kerberos configuration.
I was surprised to see on the logs, that the 3.0 daemon was refusing to start because the system
config has kerberos listed as an authentication method. I saw on the logs that the current daemon
didnt have kerberos support compiled in.
Ive seen that there is ldap support, but couldnt find anything about configuring this auth sytem, does
amnyone have any example i could check ?
Did i have to use a patched version ? or compile it on my own ?
Regards
|
|
Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ?, posted by Maikolk Kein on Mon Jan 26 15:06:49 2015
|
No no, i used the rpm form the website... I was thinking on having the bianries compiled, im downloading the server install dvd
to replicate the environment and have the same functionality.
Thanks for the answer ;-)
Regards
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Hi Maikolk,
I have elogd 3.0 running with kerberos: I had no problems with that.
Maybe you forgot to change the Makefile before compiling?
Uncomment line 28 to:
# flag for Kerberos support, please turn on if you need Kerberos
USE_KRB5 = 1
and then "make clean" and "make install" (or "make update").
Regards, Andreas
Maikolk Kein wrote: |
Hi all !!!
i have just updated and 2.9.2-1 elog instance, and i have problems with the kerberos configuration.
I was surprised to see on the logs, that the 3.0 daemon was refusing to start because the system
config has kerberos listed as an authentication method. I saw on the logs that the current daemon
didnt have kerberos support compiled in.
Ive seen that there is ldap support, but couldnt find anything about configuring this auth sytem, does
amnyone have any example i could check ?
Did i have to use a patched version ? or compile it on my own ?
Regards
|
|
|
Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jan 27 17:16:46 2015
|
Kerberos support is not compiled into the binary RPM. You have to comile from sources to get that. The reason is that there are different Kerberos libraries around, and different people need different ones.
/Stefan
|
Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ?, posted by Jimmy Bria on Tue Feb 23 22:32:30 2016
|
Hi Stefan - Do you know is Kerberos is available (compiled) on the Windows installer?
-Jimmy
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Kerberos support is not compiled into the binary RPM. You have to comile from sources to get that. The reason is that there are different Kerberos libraries around, and different people need different ones.
/Stefan
|
|
Re: Kerberos auth not available on 3.0 ?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 24 09:48:09 2016
|
Hi Jimmy, no Kerberos is not compiled into the Windows installer. You are the first one asking for that under Windows. All other Kerberos users use Linux so far. You have to compile the Windows version yourelf. This is because there are several versions of Kerberos around and people need differnt libraries. Sorry for that.
/Stefan
Jimmy Bria wrote: |
Hi Stefan - Do you know is Kerberos is available (compiled) on the Windows installer?
-Jimmy
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Kerberos support is not compiled into the binary RPM. You have to comile from sources to get that. The reason is that there are different Kerberos libraries around, and different people need different ones.
/Stefan
|
|
|
Find empty attributes, posted by Arno Teunisse on Tue Feb 16 23:19:31 2016
|
Want to use the find function from ELOG to search for empty fields ( Attributes that are not defined )
How to do that ?
Could not find it in the Forum.
Greetings Arno Teunisse
|
Re: Find empty attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 17 08:18:05 2016
|
Unfortunately not possible.
Stefan
Arno Teunisse wrote: |
Want to use the find function from ELOG to search for empty fields ( Attributes that are not defined )
How to do that ?
Could not find it in the Forum.
Greetings Arno Teunisse
|
|
Re: Find empty attributes, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Feb 17 18:08:53 2016
|
It is possible for normal string attributes: the regular expression pattern "^$" can be used to search for an empty string.
E.g. in this Forum "ELOG Version" is a required attribute, and should never be empty. But if you search for:
you'll find a couple of entries from a time where it apparently wasn't a required attribute.
Cheers
Andreas
Arno Teunisse wrote: |
Want to use the find function from ELOG to search for empty fields ( Attributes that are not defined )
How to do that ?
Could not find it in the Forum.
Greetings Arno Teunisse
|
|
Re: Find empty attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 17 18:33:18 2016
|
Cool, I didn't know that trick myself, thanks for sharing.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
It is possible for normal string attributes: the regular expression pattern "^$" can be used to search for an empty string.
E.g. in this Forum "ELOG Version" is a required attribute, and should never be empty. But if you search for:
you'll find a couple of entries from a time where it apparently wasn't a required attribute.
Cheers
Andreas
Arno Teunisse wrote: |
Want to use the find function from ELOG to search for empty fields ( Attributes that are not defined )
How to do that ?
Could not find it in the Forum.
Greetings Arno Teunisse
|
|
|
size of atributes in summary mode, posted by Diego on Wed Feb 10 22:55:42 2016
|
Good night,
I would be grateful if someone could indicate me, how could I increase the size of the block where the text of the atribute are in the summary mode.I would like, for example, increase the size of the "subject" you can see on the picture.
Thank you so much!!!
|
Re: size of atributes in summary mode, posted by Diego on Wed Feb 10 23:44:38 2016
|
I answer myself... Modify the value of width=100% in the class .listtitle2 in the .css file.
Diego wrote: |
Good night,
I would be grateful if someone could indicate me, how could I increase the size of the block where the text of the atribute are in the summary mode.I would like, for example, increase the size of the "subject" you can see on the picture.
Thank you so much!!!
|
|
New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/", posted by Tapasi Ghosh on Mon Feb 8 13:52:33 2016
|
Dear All,
I could not submit a new enetry to my logbook whenever restarting my laptop. I am a new user to elog.
Attached is the screenshot of the error message and also there is "nobody" while I grep elog.
----------------------
>>
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro-2:elog-3.1.0 tapasi$ ps aux | grep elog
tapasi 560 0.4 0.0 2432772 644 s002 S+ 9:50AM 0:00.01 grep elog
nobody 76 0.0 0.4 2481308 18440 ?? Ss 9:48AM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
--------------------------
Any suggesstion will be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Tapasi
|
Re: New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/", posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Feb 8 15:07:05 2016
|
You should check if the directory /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo belongs to the right user and has the right write permissions.
Since the elogd process belongs to the user "nobody", the directory should best belong to "nobody" as well (or - not recommended - allows write access for "others")
Cheers, Andreas
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
Dear All,
I could not submit a new enetry to my logbook whenever restarting my laptop. I am a new user to elog.
Attached is the screenshot of the error message and also there is "nobody" while I grep elog.
----------------------
>>
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro-2:elog-3.1.0 tapasi$ ps aux | grep elog
tapasi 560 0.4 0.0 2432772 644 s002 S+ 9:50AM 0:00.01 grep elog
nobody 76 0.0 0.4 2481308 18440 ?? Ss 9:48AM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
--------------------------
Any suggesstion will be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Tapasi
|
|
Re: New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/", posted by Tapasi Ghosh on Mon Feb 8 16:19:11 2016
|
Thanks for your reply.
I am the user and it also has the write access
cd /usr/local/elog/
ls -ltr
drwxrwxrwx 6 tapasi admin 204 Jan 7 18:26 demo
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
You should check if the directory /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo belongs to the right user and has the right write permissions.
Since the elogd process belongs to the user "nobody", the directory should best belong to "nobody" as well (or - not recommended - allows write access for "others")
Cheers, Andreas
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
Dear All,
I could not submit a new enetry to my logbook whenever restarting my laptop. I am a new user to elog.
Attached is the screenshot of the error message and also there is "nobody" while I grep elog.
----------------------
>>
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro-2:elog-3.1.0 tapasi$ ps aux | grep elog
tapasi 560 0.4 0.0 2432772 644 s002 S+ 9:50AM 0:00.01 grep elog
nobody 76 0.0 0.4 2481308 18440 ?? Ss 9:48AM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
--------------------------
Any suggesstion will be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Tapasi
|
|
|
Re: New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/", posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Feb 8 16:27:45 2016
|
The process elogd runs as the user "nobody". This user obviously cannot write to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo.
But apparently you've created the wrong directory anyway: you've listed /usr/local/elog/demo, but ELOG looks for /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo.
Cheers, Andreas
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
Thanks for your reply.
I am the user and it also has the write access
cd /usr/local/elog/
ls -ltr
drwxrwxrwx 6 tapasi admin 204 Jan 7 18:26 demo
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
You should check if the directory /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo belongs to the right user and has the right write permissions.
Since the elogd process belongs to the user "nobody", the directory should best belong to "nobody" as well (or - not recommended - allows write access for "others")
Cheers, Andreas
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
Dear All,
I could not submit a new enetry to my logbook whenever restarting my laptop. I am a new user to elog.
Attached is the screenshot of the error message and also there is "nobody" while I grep elog.
----------------------
>>
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro-2:elog-3.1.0 tapasi$ ps aux | grep elog
tapasi 560 0.4 0.0 2432772 644 s002 S+ 9:50AM 0:00.01 grep elog
nobody 76 0.0 0.4 2481308 18440 ?? Ss 9:48AM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
--------------------------
Any suggesstion will be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Tapasi
|
|
|
|
Re: New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/", posted by Tapasi Ghosh on Mon Feb 8 17:40:27 2016
|
Sorry, it was my mistake while copying from terminal to the email . There is no "demo" directory under /usr/local/lib.
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro:elog tapasi$ cd /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro:demo tapasi$ ls -ltr
total 0
drwxr-xr-x 3 tapasi admin 102 Sep 22 11:00 2001
drwxr-xr-x 55 503 admin 1870 Dec 17 13:21 2015
drwxr-xr-x 2 tapasi admin 68 Jan 7 14:54 2016
So, how can I change the user from "nobody" to my name, so that elogd runs in my user name ?
Thanks
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
The process elogd runs as the user "nobody". This user obviously cannot write to /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo.
But apparently you've created the wrong directory anyway: you've listed /usr/local/elog/demo, but ELOG looks for /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo.
Cheers, Andreas
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
Thanks for your reply.
I am the user and it also has the write access
cd /usr/local/elog/
ls -ltr
drwxrwxrwx 6 tapasi admin 204 Jan 7 18:26 demo
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
You should check if the directory /usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo belongs to the right user and has the right write permissions.
Since the elogd process belongs to the user "nobody", the directory should best belong to "nobody" as well (or - not recommended - allows write access for "others")
Cheers, Andreas
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
Dear All,
I could not submit a new enetry to my logbook whenever restarting my laptop. I am a new user to elog.
Attached is the screenshot of the error message and also there is "nobody" while I grep elog.
----------------------
>>
Tapasis-MacBook-Pro-2:elog-3.1.0 tapasi$ ps aux | grep elog
tapasi 560 0.4 0.0 2432772 644 s002 S+ 9:50AM 0:00.01 grep elog
nobody 76 0.0 0.4 2481308 18440 ?? Ss 9:48AM 0:00.08 /usr/local/sbin/elogd -c /usr/local/elog/elogd.cfg
--------------------------
Any suggesstion will be very much appreciated.
Thanks in advance,
Tapasi
|
|
|
|
|
Re: New entry cannot be written to directory "/usr/local/elog/logbooks/demo/", posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 8 19:29:47 2016
|
Use
usr = <user anme>
in elogd.cfg as written in the documentation.
Stefan
Tapasi Ghosh wrote: |
So, how can I change the user from "nobody" to my name, so that elogd runs in my user name ?
|
|
Applying cell style or some sort of subst in list view only, posted by Francois Cloutier on Thu Feb 4 14:21:19 2016
|
Good day,
I have an attribute that is 25 chars. it can be empty until someone edit it to fill the information.
The default view for that logbook is List.
Is it possible to display that attribute in list view but not the entire 25 chars ?
What I mean is that if the field is empty, show it as empty but if it has some information, show something like "X" in List view.
I tried playing with Styles and Cell Styles but I couldn't figure it out...
Cell Style seams to require specific values "" to apply the style properties. I can't figure how to apply cell style "if field is not empty" :)
Thanks for your help :) |
Re: Applying cell style or some sort of subst in list view only, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Feb 4 14:47:50 2016
|
> Good day,
>
> I have an attribute that is 25 chars. it can be empty until someone edit it to fill the information.
> The default view for that logbook is List.
>
> Is it possible to display that attribute in list view but not the entire 25 chars ?
> What I mean is that if the field is empty, show it as empty but if it has some information, show something like "X" in List view.
>
> I tried playing with Styles and Cell Styles but I couldn't figure it out...
> Cell Style seams to require specific values "" to apply the style properties. I can't figure how to apply cell style "if field is not empty" :)
>
> Thanks for your help :)
Unfortunately something like this is not implemented in elog.
Stefan |
Re: Applying cell style or some sort of subst in list view only, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Thu Feb 4 15:07:07 2016
|
> Good day,
>
> I have an attribute that is 25 chars. it can be empty until someone edit it to fill the information.
> The default view for that logbook is List.
>
> Is it possible to display that attribute in list view but not the entire 25 chars ?
> What I mean is that if the field is empty, show it as empty but if it has some information, show something like "X" in List view.
>
> I tried playing with Styles and Cell Styles but I couldn't figure it out...
> Cell Style seams to require specific values "" to apply the style properties. I can't figure how to apply cell style "if field is not empty" :)
>
> Thanks for your help :)
If your server would run on Linux, then the configuration below would just do what you've asked for:
Attributes = X
List change X = $shell(if [ -z "$X" ] ;then echo "";else echo "X";fi)
But since shell scripting is operating system dependent, you'll need to figure out yourself how to do it in Windows.
Cheers
Andreas |
Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server?, posted by Dawang on Fri Jan 15 00:20:42 2016
|
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund |
Re: Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 15 08:04:09 2016
|
When you install elog under windows, an example config file gets installed which lets you do already what you want. Then you can extend the config file according to the documentation https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html
Dawang wrote: |
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund
|
|
Re: Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jan 15 15:31:54 2016
|
I admit that I'm not sure if I understood the question. It is quite some work to do the opposite, to run elog behind an Apache Web Server.
But if you just install ELOG out of the box it will always run without an Apache Web Server. You don't need to add anything in the config file for that.
Dawang wrote: |
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund
|
|
Re: Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server?, posted by Dawang on Fri Jan 29 05:38:03 2016
|
Thanks Andreas and Stefan,
Since I'm not good in setting up webserver, do you know a web hosting company that can I use to integrate elog so that i can access my elog publicly same as you are using here? Thanks.
BR,
Raymund
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
I admit that I'm not sure if I understood the question. It is quite some work to do the opposite, to run elog behind an Apache Web Server.
But if you just install ELOG out of the box it will always run without an Apache Web Server. You don't need to add anything in the config file for that.
Dawang wrote: |
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund
|
|
|
Re: Can I host elog in the web under windows platform without Apache Web Server?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Jan 29 06:35:05 2016
|
Can't help you with that, and I think it is the wrong forum to ask that question.
You'll need a web service provider that will allow you to run your own services.
And then it'll either require some skills in host administration or a full host service by the provider.
Cheers, Andreas
Dawang wrote: |
Thanks Andreas and Stefan,
Since I'm not good in setting up webserver, do you know a web hosting company that can I use to integrate elog so that i can access my elog publicly same as you are using here? Thanks.
BR,
Raymund
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
I admit that I'm not sure if I understood the question. It is quite some work to do the opposite, to run elog behind an Apache Web Server.
But if you just install ELOG out of the box it will always run without an Apache Web Server. You don't need to add anything in the config file for that.
Dawang wrote: |
Hi All,
Can I host elog in the web (internet) under windows platform (elogd.exe only) without Apache Web Server? If possible, what syntax should I add in the configuration file? Appreciate feedback. Thanks.
Cheers,
Raymund
|
|
|
|
attachments created using "Image" button can not be clicked-on and do not appear in the attachment table., posted by Devin Bougie on Wed Jan 27 21:33:53 2016
|
This has been confirmed usign the Demo forum on this server. For example, please see https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/8
When an image is attached using the "Image" button in the CKEditor, that image does not appear in the attachment table for that entry. In addition, the image can not be clicked on to view the full image.
This was not the case in v2.9.2, at least.
Is there some configuration option I could toggle to change this behaviour? By default, we would like any attachment (whether it's made using drag and drop, the Image button, or the "Choose File" button) to appear in the attachment table *and* be clickable to view the full image.
Thanks,
Devin |
Re: attachments created using "Image" button can not be clicked-on and do not appear in the attachment table., posted by Devin Bougie on Thu Jan 28 20:02:06 2016
|
As there appears to be some inconsistencies, I thought I'd document the behaviour of each of the attachment options.
------
1. Click on the "Image" button in the CKEditor, click on "Choose File" and browse to the file, click on "Send it to the Server", and click "OK".
- The image appears inline at the configured "Thumbnail size", but it is not clickable and it does not appear in the attachment table when viewing the entry.
2. Drag and drop an image into the body of the message.
- The image appears inline at the configured "Thumbnail size" and is clickable. As with "1," however, it does not appear in the attachment table when viewing the entry.
3. Drag and drop an image into the "Drop attachments here ..." section.
- The image appears in the attachment table at the configured Thumbnail Size, and is clickable.
4. From the attachment table, click on "Choose File" and then click on "Upload."
- The image appears in the attachment table at the configured Thumbnail Size, and is clickable.
------
We need to make sure the images are always clickable so that you can always view the full-sized image. Any suggestions for fixing this, short of reverting to v2.9.2, would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks again,
Devin
Devin Bougie wrote: |
This has been confirmed usign the Demo forum on this server. For example, please see https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/8
When an image is attached using the "Image" button in the CKEditor, that image does not appear in the attachment table for that entry. In addition, the image can not be clicked on to view the full image.
This was not the case in v2.9.2, at least.
Is there some configuration option I could toggle to change this behaviour? By default, we would like any attachment (whether it's made using drag and drop, the Image button, or the "Choose File" button) to appear in the attachment table *and* be clickable to view the full image.
Thanks,
Devin
|
|