I'm not sure if this is the expected behavior, but it appears as though an attachment is not displayed in the list of attachments if you manually add a link to the attachment into the body of the entry.  I would greatly appreciate any advice on how to fix or change this behavior.

I will try to demonstrate with the two attachments on this entry.  There are two attachments in this entry, but only one appears in the standard view of the entry.

Picture_1.png.png 

Many thanks,

Devin

Hi all,

I have set my PC in Time Zone GMT+10:00 but I get GMT time in Entry time/Last edit field.

I have installed in another PC. Which has Time Zone GMT+10:00 but I still get GMT time in Entry time/Last edit field.

Please help. Thank you very much.

Hi,

I'm trying to synchronize an elog in my computer with my personal elog in my institute's server. The two elogd.cfg files are necessarily different since the elog in my institute is for many people's elogs, so I'm not completely sure this is supposed to work.  

I've copied the configuration of my (remote) elog into my local elogd.cfg file, and added in the global section of the local file:

Mirror server = https://www.pp.rhul.ac.uk:8080/

Mirror Config = 1

Mirror cron = 0 7-19 * * 0-5

Mirror user = ricardo

Password file = [my password file]

Then I relaunched my local elogd demon and tried both to synchronize the local elog and to wait for the cron job to do it. When I try to synchronize the "ATLAS Trigger" elog I get in the browser:

"Safari can’t open the page “https://localhost:8080/ATLAS+Trigger/?cmd=Synchronize” because Safari can’t establish a secure connection to the server “localhost”"

(the local elog is in https://localhost:8080/ATLAS+Trigger/)

When I wait for cron to update from the mirror this is what I get in the log:

28-Jul-2009 18:51:09 [] SSLServer listening on port 8080 ...

28-Jul-2009 18:50:00 [] Cron job started

28-Jul-2009 18:50:00 [] {ATLAS Trigger} MIRROR: Remote server is not an ELOG server

 Hi Stefan,

I'd like to request a feature: automatic alphabetization of the items in the Quick Filter menus.

We track quite a few detector assemblies, which are produced with non-sequential designations. It would be useful if the Quick Filter list was automatically sorted alphabetically to make it more convenient for folks to find a particular item.

I know people can always search by designation but it would be handy to have this alpha sorting feature. Would it be possible to include that in a future release?

Thanks again for a *very* useful logging system!

Dennis

Hi,

I am using syntax like (from the doc):

Display Telephone = <a href="http://any.company.com/telbook.cgi?search=$Name">$Name's telephone number</a>

Until yesterday this was interpreted as HTML.

After upgrading to 2.7.7, I still get a valid link but the full HTML code is also displayed: the user sees
''<a href="http://any.company.com/telbook.cgi?search=myname">myname's telephone number</a>''
where he should only see:
''myname's telephone number''

I am 99% sure this is a consequence of the upgrade. Is there a way to get the original behaviour back?
Thanks a lot
Soren Poulsen

We are exploring whether it's possible/feasible to import ELog logbooks into a another database for special purposes (plotting/statisical, etc). Target database is TBD (perhaps Access).

Does anyone have or know of a logbook parser program? From cut/pasting into, for example, Excel, it does appear that the data fields are already line-feed delimited so offhand it would seem possible to parse if one really wanted to pursue it.

Regards,

- Alan

excuse my butting in ...  I've found the exports useful in the past - however, is is possible to run the export from a script in order to produce reports?  Utilities like wget won't work as the export process doesn't return the data as html.

regards

Steve

Dear Sirs,

searching for keywords regular expression becomes very long. Are there any other type easy multiple keyword search supported. For example a keyword search like keyword1 & keyword2 results in different output than a keyword search like keyword2 & keyword1. A simple keyword search like "keyword1 & keyword2 and keyword2 &keyword1 should find all documents in a database containing both keywords resulting in the same output.

Thank you very much for you help in advance.

Best Regards

Johannes Liegl