ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
68375
|
Tue Aug 9 04:23:07 2016 |
| Chris Smyth | chris.smyth@comcast.net | Request | Windows | Latest | Re: Sample of actual elog Config with URL in SSL | By the Makefile i belive you are refering to the elogd.cfg? if not what file do I have use?
I have added
port = 443
ssl = 1
Without sucess.
I then tried
port = 443
use_ssl = 1
still no sucess.
I cant find any file that has "#USE_SSL =1" that I can uncomment. I am using an older version of ELOG (ELOG278-2) reading all the documentation I cant seem to figure it out.
I also configured elogd to listen on port 443
Opened a CMD window and entered >elogd -p 443
Says listening on port 443 but still not working.
On the most curent version of ELOG 3.1.0 I just modify the elogd.cfg added ssl = 1 and change the port to 443 and everthing works as advertised. I do the same on this version and I cant get it working. I could really use some help. Thanks for the fast response.
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
Very easy: uncomment the line USE_SSL=1 in the Makefile and then compile.
You'll need of course a gcc compiler on your Windows system, a makefile environment, SSL libraries, etc.. If you don't have that: ask you local administrator.
Cheers, Andreas
|
how do I compile elogd with USE_SSL=1?
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
You normally don't need to specify "URL = xxx" at all. It is only needed if you work with a Proxy that changes the normal ELOG URL. And yes, you'll need "Port = 433" and "SSL =1".
And elogd must be compiled with USE_SSL=1, maybe that's your problem?
In addition you should buy a valid SSL certificate. Otherwise every user needs to acknowledge an exception for your invalid SSL certificate.
Cheers, Andreas
Dawang wrote: |
HI Guys,
Can you please give me an idea how will I write in the config. I want my elog will be accessed via internet. Though there's a tutorial / guideline, I need an actual config file for me to easily grasp how the URL = xxx should be write. Do my port should be Port = 433 and SSL=1?
Thanks,
Raymund
|
|
|
|
|
68424
|
Mon Sep 12 18:44:09 2016 |
| Chris Smyth | chris.smyth@comcast.net | Question | Windows | ELOG V2.7.8-229 | Body Width | How do I make this section Wider or Shorter in the 2.7.8 version?
Maybe I did something to make it shorter? ELCode shows as a full box but plain txt is very short box. |
68425
|
Mon Sep 12 19:10:03 2016 |
| Chris Smyth | chris.smyth@comcast.net | Question | Windows | ELOG V2.7.8-229 | Re: Body Width | > How do I make this section Wider or Shorter in the 2.7.8 version?
> Maybe I did something to make it shorter? ELCode shows as a full box but plain txt is very short box.
Never mind Found it
In Global set
Message Width = 95 |
68438
|
Sat Oct 1 15:32:53 2016 |
| Chris Smyth | chris.smyth@comcast.net | Question | Windows | 2.7.1 | Enforcement of password complexity | Is there a way to enforce password complexity for users?
Either in this version of elog or the newest version? |
67443
|
Wed Feb 20 21:13:28 2013 |
| Chris Smith | crms57@yahoo.ca | Question | Windows | ELOG V2.7. | Multiple versions of elog on one server | Is there a way of having multiple copies of elog running on one windows 2003 server? different ports?
I need to access 2 different elogd.cfg files. |
67445
|
Wed Feb 20 23:41:00 2013 |
| Chris Smith | crms57@yahoo.ca | Question | Windows | ELOG V2.7. | Re: Multiple versions of elog on one server |
David Pilgram wrote: |
Chris Smith wrote: |
Is there a way of having multiple copies of elog running on one windows 2003 server? different ports?
I need to access 2 different elogd.cfg files.
|
It's probably not of much help, but for a short time I ran two elog daemons on the same linux box, using different ports. It was thus able to run with two separate elogd.cfg files. This is linux, and heavily biased to my eccentric way of running this linux box, but started them as:
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8080 -c /home/logbooks1/elogd1.cfg -d /home/logbooks1
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8081 -c /home/logbooks2/elogd2.cfg -d /home/logbooks2
Do note that as I was the only user on that linux box, I didn't have login etc.
However, I was soon asked questions by Andreas as to how I found this running, as he had encountered problems with an earlier version. To be honest, that stopped me experimenting too far with this at that point, as well as a coincidental upgrading of my hardware.
But I was doing this *not* because I had to run two separate elogd.cfg files, but other reasons which meant splitting into two at that time vastly improved the performance of elog on the linux box at that time. So while I didn't actually enounter any problems in doing so, I only have limited experience - and, of course, absolutely none on running even one [windows equivalent of a daemon] on Windows.
I am assuming here you have good reason for two separate elogd.cfg files, rather than just wanting to run two separate logbooks - guessing here, but one set public (no login) and one set private (with login)?
|
I need to do this because there are 2 different groups that each have 6 or 7 different logbooks in their elogd.cfg files. (and they can't access each others log books)
Currently the first group accesses elog as http:elog.com:8080. The elogd windows service executes "C:\Program FilesELOG\elogd.exe" -D -c "C:\Program Files\ELOG\elogd.cfg"
From what I can tell, whats needed is either some way to get the windows service to run a different config file or there needs to be a way of creating a second elog windows service that points to a different elogd.cfg file. Is there some way of doing this? |
67449
|
Thu Feb 21 20:05:44 2013 |
| Chris Smith | crms57@yahoo.ca | Question | Windows | ELOG V2.7. | Re: Multiple versions of elog on one server |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Chris Smith wrote: |
David Pilgram wrote: |
Chris Smith wrote: |
Is there a way of having multiple copies of elog running on one windows 2003 server? different ports?
I need to access 2 different elogd.cfg files.
|
It's probably not of much help, but for a short time I ran two elog daemons on the same linux box, using different ports. It was thus able to run with two separate elogd.cfg files. This is linux, and heavily biased to my eccentric way of running this linux box, but started them as:
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8080 -c /home/logbooks1/elogd1.cfg -d /home/logbooks1
/usr/local/sbin/elogd -p 8081 -c /home/logbooks2/elogd2.cfg -d /home/logbooks2
Do note that as I was the only user on that linux box, I didn't have login etc.
However, I was soon asked questions by Andreas as to how I found this running, as he had encountered problems with an earlier version. To be honest, that stopped me experimenting too far with this at that point, as well as a coincidental upgrading of my hardware.
But I was doing this *not* because I had to run two separate elogd.cfg files, but other reasons which meant splitting into two at that time vastly improved the performance of elog on the linux box at that time. So while I didn't actually enounter any problems in doing so, I only have limited experience - and, of course, absolutely none on running even one [windows equivalent of a daemon] on Windows.
I am assuming here you have good reason for two separate elogd.cfg files, rather than just wanting to run two separate logbooks - guessing here, but one set public (no login) and one set private (with login)?
|
I need to do this because there are 2 different groups that each have 6 or 7 different logbooks in their elogd.cfg files. (and they can't access each others log books)
Currently the first group accesses elog as http:elog.com:8080. The elogd windows service executes "C:\Program FilesELOG\elogd.exe" -D -c "C:\Program Files\ELOG\elogd.cfg"
From what I can tell, whats needed is either some way to get the windows service to run a different config file or there needs to be a way of creating a second elog windows service that points to a different elogd.cfg file. Is there some way of doing this?
|
Have you checked the option "Top groups", which was made especially for that case? You can create several independent sets of logbooks not seeing each other.
|
I will check out the "Top Groups". But another question, the documentation says "Prior to ELOG version 2.4.1, one had to run two elogd servers in parallel, listening under different ports." ... how do you set this up? |
68794
|
Sat May 5 11:22:50 2018 |
| Chris Rasmussen | chris.rasmussen@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.9.2 | Re: Elog ID entry bug at >99999 entries | Hi Andreas, I'm working on the same experiment as Joseph who submitted the bug report.
You are right, IDs greater than 10^5 are created no problem. The issue is with the internal elog link, in this case of the form elog:SequencerEvents/XXXXX The link generated uses only the first 5 digits of the message ID, and therefore links to the wrong message. In the two attachments you can see our sequencer event number 100098, first displaying the message where all of the ID is displayed and secondly in "full" view of the elog front page. Here, the "ID" column contains a link with the string: elog:SequencerEvents/10009. Our problem is that we often use this string to paste into other elogs and generate a link to the sequencer event message. However, since the string uses too few digits, we end up with a link to the wrong message
Andreas Luedeke wrote: |
I am not sure I understand your bug report.
I can easily create IDs greater than 100'000 (see attached picture), but that is not your problem, or is it?
Cheers, Andreas
Joseph McKenna wrote: |
We have a possible bug with elog that the ID for an elog entry at over 99,999 entires reads as 10,000...
68792/1 Illistrates the problem, we use this ID often to cross reference from out datalog...
Is this a know bug we can find a fix for? We are using: elogd 2.9.2 built Jul 14 2015, 18:58:06 revision
|
|
|
Attachment 1: sequencer_event_100098.PNG
|
|
Attachment 2: sequencer_event_10009X.PNG
|
|
|