Re: Adjustment of summary columns, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Dec 17 12:11:22 2021
|
You can manually modify the CSS style to adjust column widths. Locate elog.css which resides under elog/themes/default/elog.css, then find the class “.listtitle”, and modify the line
width: 0%;
to something like
width: 10%;
you can play with the width until it suits your needs. After each change, you have to reload the page in the browser to see the effect.
If you only want to change the width of a specific column, add following lines to your elog.css:
.listtitle:nth-child(4) {
width:30%;
}
where ‘4” is for example the 4th column. You can have several of these statements for different columns.
To hide the text, use the option 'summary lines' as described in the manual.
Mariia Fedkevych wrote: |
Hi!
Is it possible to manage the column widths on a logbook's summary page one by one?
Also, is it possible to hide the Text column without actually hiding the text body in entries (as Show Text = 0 in elog.cfg does)?
Kind regards,
Mariia
|
|
Re: Adjustment of summary columns, posted by Mariia Fedkevych on Tue Dec 21 10:40:11 2021
|
Thank you!
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
You can manually modify the CSS style to adjust column widths. Locate elog.css which resides under elog/themes/default/elog.css, then find the class “.listtitle”, and modify the line
width: 0%;
to something like
width: 10%;
you can play with the width until it suits your needs. After each change, you have to reload the page in the browser to see the effect.
If you only want to change the width of a specific column, add following lines to your elog.css:
.listtitle:nth-child(4) {
width:30%;
}
where ‘4” is for example the 4th column. You can have several of these statements for different columns.
To hide the text, use the option 'summary lines' as described in the manual.
Mariia Fedkevych wrote: |
Hi!
Is it possible to manage the column widths on a logbook's summary page one by one?
Also, is it possible to hide the Text column without actually hiding the text body in entries (as Show Text = 0 in elog.cfg does)?
Kind regards,
Mariia
|
|
|
Re: Adjustment of summary columns, posted by Mariia Fedkevych on Fri Jan 28 17:37:55 2022
|
Thank you!
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
You can manually modify the CSS style to adjust column widths. Locate elog.css which resides under elog/themes/default/elog.css, then find the class “.listtitle”, and modify the line
width: 0%;
to something like
width: 10%;
you can play with the width until it suits your needs. After each change, you have to reload the page in the browser to see the effect.
If you only want to change the width of a specific column, add following lines to your elog.css:
.listtitle:nth-child(4) {
width:30%;
}
where ‘4” is for example the 4th column. You can have several of these statements for different columns.
To hide the text, use the option 'summary lines' as described in the manual.
Mariia Fedkevych wrote: |
Hi!
Is it possible to manage the column widths on a logbook's summary page one by one?
Also, is it possible to hide the Text column without actually hiding the text body in entries (as Show Text = 0 in elog.cfg does)?
Kind regards,
Mariia
|
|
|
Use different HTML class for drafts compared to not existing entries, posted by Edmund Hertle on Wed Mar 9 16:25:31 2022
|
Right now a Draft shows a red error indication, that the entry is currently a draft. For the CSS styling it uses the HTML class="errormsg". The same class is also used if an entry does not exist.
Would it be possible for the draft version to use a different HTML class (for example class="draftmsg")? It can also use the same visual style (or making it yellow would probably also work)
The reason is that the py_elog Interface uses the class="errormsg" to determine if an entry does not exist ( https://github.com/paulscherrerinstitute/py_elog/blob/master/elog/logbook.py#L394 ) and refuses to return the content for this entry. One could possibly fix that also on the py_elog part, but it would probably at least require parsing of actual text (which might make problems for translated pages). Alternativley one could also look for the edit button, but maybe a small change on the elog server side is the simplest solution to this problem?
|
Duplicated \n in "plain" format with new WebKit, posted by Andrey on Tue Dec 27 12:44:52 2022
|
Dear Stefan,
There is a problem with editing an Elog page in "plain" format with the following "User Agent" :
"Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/605.1.15 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/16.1 Safari/605.1.15"
It duplicates the newline symbols such that "1<CRLF>2" becomes "1<CRLF><CRLF>2". If edited again - "1<CRLF><CRLF><CRLF><CRLF>2".
I blame the new version of the Apple WebKit.
It works fine with Chrome (user agent: "Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_15_7) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/108.0.0.0 Safari/537.36"). But fails with Safari.
Could you please have a look?
Thank you in advance,
Andrey Pashnin
AMS collaboration
|
bug report to webkit.org , posted by Andrey on Wed Dec 28 16:09:30 2022
|
It shound't be a "bug report", sorry. I have changed the category to "Info".
It seems to be really a bug in the WebKit core. I have created a bug report there. For reference: https://bugs.webkit.org/show_bug.cgi?id=249923
I am going to try to patch the ELOG code to handle the content of the textarea in the "plain" format.... it doesn't seem possible though. |
a hack around, posted by Andrey on Thu Dec 29 20:26:11 2022
|
FYI.
Removing "wrap=hard" on the line #11461 in the elogd.cxx file resolves my problem.
- rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d wrap=hard name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);*/
+ rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);
|
a hack around, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Fri Dec 30 00:46:03 2022
|
- rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d wrap=hard name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);
+ rsprintf("<textarea rows=%d cols=%d name=\"Text\">\n", height, width);
my vote is to remove "wrap=hard":
1) I try to read the specs and my head explodes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/textarea
2) textarea should just accept input typed by user, should not try to "neatify" it. if user wants long lines, we should let them.
3) this bug (introduced in recent safari, the best I can tell)
K.O. |