Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 734 of 796  Not logged in ELOG logo
 Find |  Login |  Help 
 Full | Summary | Threaded | Hide attachments  Show only new entries    6361 Entries 
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 733, 734, 735 ... 794, 795, 796   Next  
ID Date Icon Author Author Emailup Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  2214   Wed Apr 25 19:39:57 2007 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comInfoWindows2.6.5Re: WYSIWYG (What you see is what you get)

Stefan Ritt wrote:

An Thai wrote:
Dear all,

I use the freemail from provider Web.de and find that its web-email editor ist very nice.
All formated text will be displayed in the right way, WYSIWYG.

Has sombody an idea, how to improve the Elog like this?

Best regards


Well, all this is possible with ELCode tags, as you can see below. The advantage is that you can enter these tags with any browser, even with a text based browser. Have you tried to use the web.de page with a non-IE browser like Firefox? It doesn't work! They use very special JavaScript and AJAX with locks you to IE. And this is not the philosophy of ELOG. You should be able to do everything, even if JavaScript is switched off.

Dear BIG RED Smile,

Here is the bulleting:

  • First line
  • Second line
  • third line
Line numbering with under line:

  1. First line
  2. Second line
  3. Third line

Centered text



Quote:

AMEN!!!
  2215   Wed Apr 25 19:42:22 2007 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comQuestionWindows Re: is there any other way for users to have access without my being online?

marion wrote:
is there any other way for users to have access to the ELOG without my being online?

marion



Quote:

Your windows machine must be turned on, on the network, but you do not have to be logged in IF you have setup elog to "Run as a Service"
  2216   Wed Apr 25 19:44:34 2007 Agree Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comBug reportAll | Other2.6.2-1739Re: "Guest menu commands" not changing the menu line

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
BTW, WebSVN no longer provides a means of downloading a tar of your code trunk. I had to go to http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/tar/ in order to get your 2.6.4-1 revision.


That should be fixed now.


Steve Jones wrote:
Ok, here is what I found. Apparently in the past there was a "Find Menu Commands = " option? Because I had this in my config and elog was not barfing on it being there. So, I changed the word "Find" with "List" and things seems to now work. Stefan, was there an old command called "Find Menu Commands"?


Yes. Indeed this was changes some time ago. Have a look at elog:880. Unfortunately I did not announce this change clearly.



Quote:

Ok, I am fixed now (took me awhile to respond - sorry).

Thanks Stefan!
  2306   Mon Aug 6 17:43:52 2007 Warning Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.6.2-1739Too many logbooks during user registration
Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).

My question: Is it possible to limit - or remove - the checkboxes that the user can select during registration? I realize that this is a browser issue but I doubt I can persuade those guys to fix FireFox.

Thanks.
  2316   Tue Sep 11 15:30:11 2007 Reply Steve Jonessteve.jones@freescale.comRequestAll2.6.2-1739Re: Too many logbooks during user registration

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Steve Jones wrote:
Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).

My question: Is it possible to limit - or remove - the checkboxes that the user can select during registration? I realize that this is a browser issue but I doubt I can persuade those guys to fix FireFox.

Thanks.


I changed the current SVN version (#1909) to show only the list of logbooks if there are ten or less logbooks, in order not to make the URL too long. On the activation by the administrator, the list of subscribed logbooks appears as previously, but all are unchecked. So it's the task of the administrator to enable subscriptions or not.



Quote:
So the list is shown to the one requesting the registration? Would it be possible to have an option that, when selected, simply did not list any logbooks? I can see a customer becoming confused if they did not see their logbook listed. Just turn off the selection completely. Otherwise, this will work but I fear will generate more questions as in "Why isn't logbook <blah> listed?"

Thanks!
  66788   Sat Apr 17 01:06:58 2010 Idea Jason St. Johnstjohn@bu.eduRequestLinux2.7.8-2278Can other pages hide behind elog user authentication?

Hello,

The elog security suits me just fine: the content is not available unless users have logged in, and as administrator I have complete control over who that is and what their privileges are. I can easily share somewhat sensitive notes, plots, and findings without making them completely open to the world. 

I have a project which generates html pages, which I'm also not really supposed to make public to the world.  I'd rather not resort to attaching them to elog entries.

Could the elog security be extended to control access to other files I put on the server? 

Thanks,

-jmsj

  68995   Wed Aug 7 02:57:55 2019 Question Lechsubs@lwp.emailQuestionLinux3.1.3tags

Hello,

Is it possible to create tags for new entries in elog? I understand it would have to be some kind of mix between Extendable options and moptions. Currently, whatever is entered in extendable options forms one option, while usually for tags, words separated by # form different tags. As usual with tags, I would like to add multiple tags to my new entry and then be able to filter all entries by specific tag or group of tags.

  69006   Tue Aug 20 09:47:06 2019 Question Lechsubs@lwp.emailQuestionLinux3.1.3Drag and drop does not work in 3.1.3?

Hello,

I can paste images into text (which resulted in the text_size too long error message), however, I can't drop them on my elog. However, I can do it on the demo version. Was the drag and drop into text already supported in version 3.1.3 and I am just missing some configuration option, or do I need to find a repository with a more recent version of elog?

Thanks!

Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 733, 734, 735 ... 794, 795, 796   Next  
ELOG V3.1.5-fe60aaf