| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
69587
|
Mon Nov 21 13:32:04 2022 |
 | David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | 3-1-4 | Re: Planned maintenance at the top of ELOG listing | The way to do this is to ensure that the
date of the entry is in the future.
As a hard -core linux (ab)user of elog, I |
|
|
69635
|
Sat Jan 28 14:26:07 2023 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Request | All | - | Re: Wikipedia Article deleted | I am rather with John on this.
I deliberately stopped contributing
to Wikipedia years ago after I added an observation |
|
|
69715
|
Mon Jan 8 15:56:40 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | In my case, I had a number of attributes
which had a varied prefix. For example,
"progressed" , which could have |
|
|
69718
|
Mon Jan 8 17:30:42 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | Or what about the "ticket number"
feature? Every new entry thread
(sorry, confusing terminology on my part) would |
|
|
69719
|
Mon Jan 8 21:08:43 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Windows | ELOG V3.1.3-a38 | Re: Maximum number of attributes | As for my suggestion earlier, now I'm
at my computer with working elog. I think
that the following four lines (three I guess |
|
|
Draft
|
Tue Apr 9 13:40:44 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | ELOG V3.1.4-395 | Re: today date in template | This was given to me by Andreas L,
In my elog.cfg file, I have the following:
|
|
|
69781
|
Tue Apr 9 13:49:51 2024 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | ELOG V3.1.4-395 | Re: today date in template | This was given to me by Andreas Luedeke of
this parish.
|
|
|
69788
|
Sat Apr 20 18:47:37 2024 |
 | David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Info | Linux | 3.1.4 | Re: Extendable list of numeric items | I have replied to this entry, because, for
some reason I don't understand, if I reply
to your latest entry, I am
|
|