ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66001
|
Mon Oct 13 17:02:17 2008 |
| Kevin O'Sullivan | kosok@stanford.edu | Question | Linux | 2.7.4-2111 | Error Message During Uploads |
We've been having toruble with uploads not working and I notice that every time someone uploads to our elog the same error message appears in /var/log/syslog:
Cannot restore original GID/UID.
How can I fix thsi error? Or, perhaps more importantly, could it cause elog to "lock up" (note, it doesn't crash)?
I'm runing elog on Ubuntu kernel version 2.6.24-server. |
66013
|
Thu Oct 23 11:45:51 2008 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Question | All | 2.7.5-2130 | Re: (How) can I hide columns in List view? |
T. Ribbrock wrote: |
[...]
One thing I don't understand for example is how does elog decide in List view which entry sets the condition? If all entries are set to the same value (in this example e.g. "Type1")? The first entry? Or am I missing something altogether? 
[...] |
By now, I'm one step further. List conditions = 1 does have some effect in some cases - the following works:
Options Type = Type1{10}, Type2{11}
Options StatusA = Status-A-red, Status-A-orange, Status-A
{10}Style StatusA Status-A-red = background-color:red
{11}Style StatusA Status-A-red = background-color:green
This seems to get evaluated "top-down", i.e. the value of "Type" in the first row in the list sets the handling of StatusA and the background-color, the second row for the third and so on. Unfortunately, this really only depends on the order of the rows on the screen - if I sort the list differently, I get a different result.
I am also quite certain that List conditions = 1 has no effect whatsover on List display - which is what I was hoping for. 
Hence, I'd like to repeat my question: Is there any way to hide columns in List view (short of editing the conf file...) - and if so, how?
Regards,
Thomas |
66015
|
Mon Oct 27 12:42:47 2008 |
| T. Ribbrock | emgaron+elog@ribbrock.org | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.5-2130 | Select -> Edit wipes dates |
I just ran into the following bug:
I have a logbook where entries have several attributes, among which several dates. All of these are set to "Type <attr> = date". If I use the "Select" action, tag several entries and subsequently chose "Edit", the values of all date attributes are wiped. All other attributes are kept at their original values, unless changed explicitly. For the date entries, the date choosers are shown (as when editing a single entry), but all set to blank.
Editing single entries works fine. |
66107
|
Thu Dec 11 17:50:35 2008 |
| Richard Stamper | r.stamper@rl.ac.uk | Request | Windows | 2.7.5-2140 | Conflict between Select-Edit and attribute types |
When doing a Select->Edit operation, if an attribute has a type of "numeric" and the records selected already have (some) values for that attribute, then the "- keep original values -" message that is inserted to indicate that the values should be preserved causes the type check to fail.
Would it be possible to modify the Javascript that carries out the type check to treat the "- keep original values -" message as an exception? |
66327
|
Tue Apr 21 22:13:26 2009 |
| Andreas Wilke | wilke4all@hotmail.de | Question | Windows | 2.7.5-2130 | Mirror Server Funktion |
Ich möchte meine "lokale" ELOG Installation mit einem Server in der Firma synchronisieren.
Dazu habe ich in der entfernten Firewall ein Portmapping auf den ELOG Server in der Firma eingerichtet.
Wenn ich von meiner "lokalen" Maschine im Browser http://meinedomain.dyndns.xx:PORT aufrufe, kann ich auf den ELOG Server zugreifen.
Ich habe in meiner "lokalen" Installation in der Section [global] den Mirror-Server = http://meinedomain.dyndns.xx:PORT angeben.
Beim Synchornisieren bekomme ich jedoch den Hinweis "Fehler beim Zugriff auf entfertes Logbuch".......
|
66361
|
Thu May 14 17:41:44 2009 |
| soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.6 | E-log crash |
Hi
I am having a little problem with e-log that I can easily reproduce.
I have defined a number of constraints on my e-log fields and I am testing what happens when the user does not respect them.
So this only happens when I am not observing the input formats or the mandatory fields.
This is the GDB trace. This is not very verbose, so I must learn to use the other tracers, I guess.
Server listening on port 8079 ...
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x0000000000414077 in is_script (
at src/elogd.c:5414
5414 for (i = 0; script_tags[i][0]; i++) {
(gdb)
Soren |
66388
|
Wed Jun 10 13:56:09 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Other | Linux | 2.7.6-2211 | Move to: elog crashes with large no of entries being moved. |
Hi Stefan,
I've been slowly moving threads, and twice now so far (and reproducably) had elog crash.
In each case, it is trying to move a thread with more than 24 entries; it copies the first 24 entries, then
crashes with "Segmentation Fault". It does not erase the lock file /var/run/elog.pid
I have got around this by manually copying the entries beyond no 24, then deleting the thread entry by entry.
I am aware that I have an old and limited machine (586, 256MB RAM, running Slack 10), and at first I was
"content" to write it off as that; but when it crashed for the second time at exactly the same entry (the
twenty-forth) even though the size of the entries would have been significantly different, I wondered if there
was some factor within elog that could affect this.
I've not tried it with Copy to:, but imagine it will also be affected as the only difference with this and Move
to: is the deletion of the thread after all the entries had been copied. |
66567
|
Thu Oct 29 20:48:41 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Bug report | Linux | 2.7.7-2252 | elog crashes with a long thread. |
Hi Stefan,
I have a thread of 70 entries. I added another entry, which was saved, but elog crashed.
It would restart, but crash every time I then tried to access that 71 entry thread.
By editing the yymmdda.log files to remove the latest entry, all was well again.
Add a test new entry (much smaller) also crashed elog as before.
If it is any help, this is the error message I caught on a console:
src/elogd.c:703: xrealloc: Assertion `*((unsigned int *) (temp + old_size)) == 0xdeadc0de' failed.
./log: line 1: 3123 Aborted
Now I have got around this, by ending that thread with reference to a new one to continue, but is this to be
expected?
If this is something (like memory allocation) that would have been in hiding from the start, I cannot imagine
that it is likely to be hit often enough to actually "bug fix" - it might, in any case, cause problems elsewhere. |