Cookie problem using Apache 1.3.23 as Proxy, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu May 1 10:27:17 2003
|
Today I found out that Apache 1.3.23 (and probably 1.3.24) has a problem
with ELOG if used as a proxy server. Due to a bug in Apache, only one
cookie is transmitted through the proxy at a time. This makes it impossible
|
User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 00:34:26 2003
|
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had a solution for my problem.
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 2 08:45:38 2003
|
> We would like to give access to selected users to only their Group. So that
> for instance Users1 cannot access the books of group Users3. I was
> wondering if there is any notion of "User profile" or security per logbook
|
Feature request - fairly urgent also :), posted by nickc1 on Fri May 2 10:32:57 2003
|
We are using elog as a small database system, today we came across a
problem where 2 people were editing the same record and the first one to
submit his changes were overwritten when the second person submitted his.
|
|
Re: Feature request - fairly urgent also :), posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 2 10:39:51 2003
|
> We are using elog as a small database system, today we came across a
> problem where 2 people were editing the same record and the first one to
> submit his changes were overwritten when the second person submitted his.
|
|
Re: Feature request - fairly urgent also :), posted by nickc1 on Fri May 2 11:05:28 2003
|
> No, but I will put it on the wishlist. Anyhow it is hard to implement
> something like this. Assume that I would lock a page whenever it's edited
by
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Robert Keeney on Fri May 2 15:58:23 2003
|
I have managed to get this to work (so far).
What I do is use a separate password file and directory for each log.
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 18:10:36 2003
|
Robert, this is exactly what we managed to do as well. And it works fine.
The only issue is that the users from one group can "SEE" the book names
available to other groups.
|