| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Text |
 |
|
215
|
Tue Feb 11 11:17:29 2003 |
 | Nick | nikc@cnic.com | Question | | | Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0 | > > > > Problem 2 - no matter what i try in
the config file i cannot get
elogd
|
|
|
214
|
Tue Feb 11 09:03:18 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0 | > Would be nice if you can specify which columns
data has links as a flag or
> setting of some sorts, as opposed to either |
|
|
213
|
Tue Feb 11 08:57:39 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry | > I just noticed that the notifications I
receive from your ELOG system,
> doesn't show anyone in the "TO:" section |
|
|
212
|
Mon Feb 10 23:36:31 2003 |
 | eric wooten | wootene@verizon.net | Bug report | | | Find | When you do a find in elog, records per page
(some crazy large number - for
your forum logbook, display 57 entries seem |
|
|
211
|
Mon Feb 10 23:19:50 2003 |
| eric wooten | wootene@verizon.net | Question | | | Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry | I just noticed that the notifications I receive
from your ELOG system,
doesn't show anyone in the "TO:" section |
|
|
210
|
Mon Feb 10 23:11:25 2003 |
| eric wooten | wootene@verizon.net | Question | | | Re: elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry | Another Question: Could ELOG be configured
to send notifications as a Blind
Copy? Just wondering if that would take |
|
|
209
|
Mon Feb 10 23:05:36 2003 |
| eric wooten | wootene@verizon.net | Question | | | elog notification process causes the email to be truncated when going to Blackberry | Hi Stefan,
Many users have there email forward to Blackberry |
|
|
208
|
Fri Feb 7 22:26:13 2003 |
| Nick | Nick@nick.com | Question | | | Re: Lost features since upgrade to 2.3.0 | > I revised the way links are placed into
the summary table, so I could have
> lost some functionality (I did not try |
|