Re: too many <table> tags, posted by Steve Jones on Thu Aug 12 23:32:46 2004
|
> > Couldn't one include the extra <table> tag only when there is really more than
> > one attribute per line. All other lines could then be aligned properly.
>
> Sure one can do a lot of things if one has enough time and not tens of other
> requests on the wishlist which really concern some functionality and not just
> cosmetics.
Ouch!
And just to add insult to injury, the same <table> structure doesn't even look the
same between, say, IE6.0 and FireFox 0.9!!
Stefan, keep up the good work! |
Re: URL bug in elogd.cfg, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Sep 8 17:39:43 2004
|
> This problem has been fixed in revision 1.462
Thank you! |
Re: Enhanced "eLog Version" Variable, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Oct 6 06:14:36 2004
|
No big deal - I looked at the code and you did a much more thorough job than I
would have done. Appreciate all of the hard work -- this product is masterful!
> Sorry for that. The idea is that the -4 is the minor number between releases
> (mainly for bug fixes and impatient users (;-) ). I accidently overwrote the
> -4 version several times when testing a new RPM building scheme, but I promise
> to take more care in the future (:-)))
>
> Having the CVS revision in the executable is however a good idea and I will
> put it in.
>
> > Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
> > constant? I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
> > things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->
> >
> > EX:
> > #define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
> > BECOMES
> > #define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?
> >
> > Just a thought.
> >
> > Thanks |
Re: Extendable options for conditional attributes, posted by David Kappel on Mon Jan 10 20:42:31 2005
|
> > > Playing with all the configuration possibilities I have one issue:
> > > I like to use the "Extendable options" but I can't combine them with
> > > the "Conditional attributes".
> >
> > That was never ment to work. But I found some time to implement it. If you
> > download elog255-4.exe from today it whould work. Let me know if you have
> > problems.
>
Hello Stefan,
the changes I asked for, are working as requested. The extandable options are
inserted into the correct line of the conditional attributes.
Thanks.
PS: While testing on a new demo logbook, I first made the mistake to declare
both options, the first one and the related one as extendable. But I can imagine
that this was really never ment to be implemented. |
Re: erroneus encoding, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 15:41:55 2005
|
the following patch corrects the problem, plz apply :
--- elogd.c 2005-02-03 16:46:10.000000000 +0100
+++ elogd_albert.c 2005-02-08 15:40:36.000000000 +0100
@@ -6178,7 +6178,7 @@
if (getcfg("global", "charset", str, sizeof(str)))
rsprintf("Content-Type: text/html;charset=%s\r\n", str);
else
- rsprintf("Content-Type: text/html;charset=%S\r\n", DEFAULT_HTTP_CHARSET);
+ rsprintf("Content-Type: text/html;charset=%s\r\n", DEFAULT_HTTP_CHARSET);
if (use_keepalive) {
rsprintf("Connection: Keep-Alive\r\n");
@@ -11267,7 +11267,7 @@
rsprintf("Server: ELOG HTTP %s\r\n", VERSION);
rsprintf("Accept-Ranges: bytes\r\n");
rsprintf("Connection: close\r\n");
- rsprintf("Content-Type: text/plain;charset=%S\r\n", DEFAULT_HTTP_CHARSET);
+ rsprintf("Content-Type: text/plain;charset=%s\r\n", DEFAULT_HTTP_CHARSET);
rsprintf("Pragma: no-cache\r\n");
rsprintf("Expires: Fri, 01 Jan 1983 00:00:00 GMT\r\n\r\n"); |
Re: preselected values and conditional options, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Feb 16 08:45:54 2005
|
> > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
> > Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
> > Required Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
> > Options Type = Deposition{1}, Arc Studies{1}, Conditioning{1}, Vacuum{2},
> > Other{3}
> > Preset Type = Deposition
>
> The "Preset xxx" option actually never was ment to be used with conditional
> attributes. I added that functionality in rev. 1.553. Please give it a try.
it works fine !!! thank you so much (btw, using Preset xxx{1} it doesn't
works.. but it should be the correct beaviour) |
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:19:51 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
> which you'll find in Sarge/stable.
>
> There are some invasive changes in this version which call for a serious
> test. In accordance with a suggestion, I've changed the configuration
> mechanism. For details, please read the NEWS.Debian file attached.
>
> Could the Debian users who follow this forum test it and give some feedback?
> You can download the package from the following link:
>
> http://l10n-turkish.alioth.debian.org/debian/elog_2.5.8+r1592-1_i386.deb
>
> Thanks in advance for your participation,
It seems to work nice to me.
Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
nice work :-) |
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Recai Oktas on Wed Mar 23 16:44:32 2005
|
> It seems to work nice to me.
> Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
Thanks for the test. Please note that, /etc/default/elog is partially auto
created during the installation. All options except PIDFILE and CONFFILE are
currently listed (as configured or commented out). If you didn't see these
options (after the update), there must be a problem. Did you mean the lack of
PIDFILE and CONFFILE in the default file? |