Re: Display last page by default, posted by Yoshio Imai on Mon Oct 31 01:39:52 2005
|
I have installed the new version, and it works just fine. It is also MUCH faster than my intermediate solution.
| Quote: |
For the moment, I could satisfy the users by setting the start page to the "All" view
|
Thanks for the work! |
|
Re: Undesirable TAG { }, posted by Alex H on Tue Nov 22 11:35:56 2005
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | | That problem was fixed on June 24th, 2005. So please upgrade to the current 2.6.0-beta5 version. |
Updated ! Thanks |
|
Re: Bad date format., posted by Alex H on Mon Dec 19 09:41:08 2005
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Alex H wrote: |
[Liste]
Type Dernière image = Date
[Image Routeurs]
Type Derniere Image = Date
|
Maybe your additional accent. The attribute list contains Derniere Image, but in your first logbook you say Type Dernière image with accent grave, so this are not the same words. |
It's work now !
Thanks  ! |
|
Re: LDAP, posted by Chris Warner on Fri Jan 13 02:37:10 2006
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Carl Shirey wrote: | I know you want to make ELOG a stand alone program. But is there a way to still make a stand alone but have the option work with LDAP?
FYI
Elog works great we us it for our shift carryover and we have about 25 people useing it and I have heard no complants with it.
Thanks |
I added your vote to the "PAM" authentication on the wishlist, since PAM contains an LDAP module. |
Please Add my vote too. I think that would be great. |
|
Re: Problem selecting ports, posted by Chris Warner on Tue Jan 17 13:59:58 2006
|
Nevermind. this was an iptables issue.
| Chris Warner wrote: | I had problems getting elog to run on port 8080 (or many others). I have it installed on Redhat Enterprise Linux rel 4. The only way I was able to get it working was using port 80. I would like to run it on a different port if possible but I'm not sure what is wrong.
Any Ideas |
|
|
Re: Attachments in duplicated entries, posted by Bertram Metz on Tue Jan 24 14:39:21 2006
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Bertram Metz wrote: | The duplicate command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments. If attachments in a duplicated entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
My suggestion is to copy the attached files too and to use file names of the copies in the duplicated entry. |
I chaned it such that attachments are removed from the duplicated entry, which was easier to implement. I hope this is ok as well. The change is in SVN revision 1584. |
Yes, that's ok for me.
Thank you very much Stefan.
Best Regards,
Bertram |
|
Re: svn revision number in the source, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Feb 21 21:58:16 2006
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Steve Jones wrote: | | So, when we go to the download section and download directly from there, that is not "committed" source? I ask because the revision id there is not set to anything that I can see. |
Can you be a bit more specific? What do you download? The Windows binaries, the Linux RPM? Or from the Subversion repository? The current version in the repository, which you can download here, contains in the file elogd.c following line 8:
$Id: elogd.c 1660 2006-02-17 19:48:12Z ritt $
This tells you that this is revision 1660, committed on Feb. 17 by myself. So what is the problem? |
| Steve Jones wrote: | Ok, this is really strange but just an hour ago I clicked on the http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download.html link and I was taken to a completely different webview - in fact, I am quite sure that at the bottom right corner it said "WebCVS"! Now, it says WebSVN and the revision info is in there. I've been trying to debug a problem with default.css and the elcode icons - and somewhere in there I cleared my firefox cache. Perhaps an old page was cached????
I have no idea how I got to CVS, and it make sense that CVS was not setting the SVN revision code.
Sorry to botter you on this. |
|
|
Re: List view for CHANGE attributes, posted by Holger Mundhahs on Wed Feb 22 15:47:45 2006
|
Hello Mr. Ritt,
6 min 5 sek to answer - great. 
Thanks & regards
Holger
| Stefan Ritt wrote: | > Hello @all,
> I've tried to implement an attribute with Change. The detail view works well,
> but in the list view the field is empty (see screen shots). Can somebody help me?
For the list view, you need an additional
List Change RIB-Admin = ...
Some people want different modes for the list view and the detail view, that's why there are two options. |
|