| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
1622
|
Tue Jan 24 08:11:13 2006 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | 2.6.0b5 | Re: Quicklink does not work for one field |
| mark james wrote: |
| mark james wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| mark james wrote: | | I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. |
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?
Mark |
In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file. |
Can you try V2.6.1-1634? I fixed several issues with ticking entries coming from "MOptions" lists. |
|
1626
|
Wed Jan 25 01:08:06 2006 |
| Giorgio Croci Candiani | g.crocic@libero.it | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
> > I just installed v.2.6.1 coming from the previous 2.6.0 (on Win2000)
> > When I access the "configuration" function from a logbook, in the cfg page I only see two buttons in the header
> > (save or cancel); in the previous version I saw more buttons there ("global config", "create new logbook" and so
> > on), so here I'm unable to access global configuration or logbook management (except for current logbook options).
>
> I tried to reproduce your problem, but could not. In my windows installation it looks fine. You only see the
> (save and cancel) buttons only if you go to "Change [global]", otherwise you see the "Change [global]", "Delete
> this logbook" etc. buttons. Have you tried with the default elogd.cfg which comes from the distribution?
Here I am again... I built and installed v2.6.1 also on a different system, this time on linux; i tried both with the
existing cfg file and with the new cfg.
Choosing "configuration", I still only see the current logbook configuration file section with "Save" and "cancel"
buttons, no access to global config whatsoever; the same as I saw on windows version. I tried version 2.6.1-1622.
Regards
Giorgio |
|
1627
|
Wed Jan 25 08:24:28 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
> Here I am again... I built and installed v2.6.1 also on a different system, this time on linux; i tried both
with the
> existing cfg file and with the new cfg.
> Choosing "configuration", I still only see the current logbook configuration file section with "Save" and "cancel"
> buttons, no access to global config whatsoever; the same as I saw on windows version. I tried version 2.6.1-1622.
I tried again, using the configuration file from the distribution (elog:1627/1). Hitting "config", I see the picture
attached (elog:1627/2). So it's a mystery why it is different in your case... |
| Attachment 1: elogd.cfg
|
[global]
port = 8080
[demo]
Theme = default
Comment = General linux tips & tricks
Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
Options Type = Routine, Software Installation, Problem Fixed, Configuration, Other
Options Category = General, Hardware, Software, Network, Other
Extendable Options = Category
Required Attributes = Author, Type
Page Title = ELOG - $subject
Reverse sort = 1
Quick filter = Date, Type
|
| Attachment 2: Capture.gif
|
|
|
1628
|
Wed Jan 25 12:08:13 2006 |
| Giorgio Croci Candiani | g.crocic@libero.it | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
> I tried again, using the configuration file from the distribution (elog:1627/1). Hitting "config", I see the picture
> attached (elog:1627/2). So it's a mystery why it is different in your case...
Indeed... I peeked into the code, and I got the feeling it could be a matter of incorrect user setup (though I have no
users/authorizations defined at all) or maybe browser cookies. A thin trail, but I'll try some debug directly on the
code and, should I come up with something, I'll surely notice you.
Thanks for your support! |
|
1629
|
Wed Jan 25 12:10:46 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | 2.6.1 | Re: Access to global configuration in v2.6.1 |
> or maybe browser cookies.
That rings a bell. If you change user permissions (like password file/no password file/rename logbooks) you might be
fooled by old cookies. Just delete all cookies in your browser and try again. |
|
1634
|
Fri Jan 27 13:50:10 2006 |
| mark james | mark@majames.com | Question | | 2.6.0b5 | Re: Quicklink does not work for one field |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| mark james wrote: |
| mark james wrote: |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| mark james wrote: | | I am not so bold as to log this as a bug but one of my Quicklink fields just do not work. |
Sorry my late reply, but now I have fixed this problem. The update is under SVN and will be contained in the next release. |
Thanks for that. I am now using ver V2.6.1-1622. So I guess that doesn't qualify as a "next release". I wonder if there is anything I could do to work around the issue?
Mark |
In fact now the dropdown seems to be working but when I 'tick' an entry, it is not being written to the ascii file. |
Can you try V2.6.1-1634? I fixed several issues with ticking entries coming from "MOptions" lists. |
OK. But where do I get this from? The "latest version of 19 Jan is still 1622. |
|
1635
|
Fri Jan 27 13:52:34 2006 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | 2.6.0b5 | Re: Quicklink does not work for one field |
| mark james wrote: | | OK. But where do I get this from? The "latest version of 19 Jan is still 1622. |
If you can compile it yourself, you get it from Subversion (see here). Otherwise you have to wait for the next release. |
|
1672
|
Thu Feb 9 14:15:54 2006 |
 | Dimitrios Tsirigkas | dimitrios.tsirigkas@cern.ch | Info | | | Posting without logging in! |
Hi all! This is an HTTP POST request submitted from the command line using curl, and providing no authentication information. If I can post as myself using this command, then shouldn't something be done about this? Cheers, Dimitris |