Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005
|
> > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3.
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > strlcpy.h. Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005
|
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9). Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
|
|
Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005
|
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
|
|
Re: password encryption, posted by Alex H on Tue May 31 09:07:37 2005
|
| Thanks Stefan 8) |
|
Re: [BUG] quick filter, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Jun 27 15:37:25 2005
|
[quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"][quote="Stefan Ritt"]
Fixed in current CVS.
|
|
Re: A comprehensive listing of all commands elog performs, posted by Gary Clayson on Thu Jul 7 04:49:19 2005
|
[quote="Emiliano Gabrielli"][quote="Gary Clayson"]Can someone please enter a comprehensive list of the commands eLog will honor. I'm trying to build a 'decent'
start page and am not totally familiar with eLog just yet. Thanks Stefan for an awesome application. The documentation is really decent, too. I just have
been unable to locate a list of all commands available.
|
|
Re: Suppress Email notification checkbox, posted by Gary Clayson on Fri Jul 8 22:20:19 2005
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Gary Clayson"]Hello All. Stefan, would it be possible to add one more option to the Suppress Default flag? I'd appreciate a
setting that would suppress emails being sent and remove the option from the page. Or, has this been accomplished? And, if so, what is that setting. Thanks
in advance!! Keep up the great work.[/quote]
|
|
Re: Summary page, posted by Dinesh Bapat on Mon Aug 1 06:14:41 2005
|
Thank you very much.
|