ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66822
|
Sat May 15 06:01:40 2010 |
| A. Martin | amartin@example.com | Bug report | All | svn | attachment filename bug & Makefile issue |
If I upload the file "000000_000000_file.txt", elog will chop the filename to "file.txt." Also, this effects
the file's displayed "Uploaded" time. It shows the file as being uploaded on: "Tue Nov 30 00:00:00 1999"
Note the attachment to this post.
----
Makefile has the line:
# flag for SSL support
USE_SSL = 1
However setting USE_SSL = 0 does not prevent the openssl libraries from being used. Same issue with USE_CRYPT.
You have to comment them out.
Lines 76-85 of Makefile should be replaced with this:
ifdef USE_SSL
ifneq ($(USE_SSL), 0)
CFLAGS += -DHAVE_SSL
LIBS += -lssl
endif
endif
ifdef USE_CRYPT
ifneq ($(USE_CRYPT), 0)
CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CRYPT
LIBS += -lcrypt
endif
endif
Thanks,
amartin |
Attachment 1: file.txt
|
66830
|
Thu May 20 04:33:07 2010 |
| A. Martin | amartin@example.com | Bug report | All | svn | Re: attachment filename bug & Makefile issue |
> > If I upload the file "000000_000000_file.txt", elog will chop the filename to "file.txt." Also, this effects
> > the file's displayed "Uploaded" time. It shows the file as being uploaded on: "Tue Nov 30 00:00:00 1999"
>
> Arghh! Why did you choose such a filename? This is the ELOG internal file format, which is YYMMDD_HHMMSS_name.ext.
> For internal reasons (mainly for synchronization) the system checks every file name, and if it contains 6 numbers
> followed by a "_" followed by 6 other numbers it thinks it's a valid date/time and uses that. Your time is however
> 0.0.0000, that's why it gets converted to some date in 1999. Do you absolutely need this functionality? While I can
> easily remove the interpretation of the date, it would break the synchronization functionality and I would have to
> find some other method to pass the file date/time, which would be quite some work. So if it's not too important for
> you, I would like to keep it as it is.
>
Thank you for your response.
I can certainly use another filename, but I'm curious why elog doesn't convert the filename "000000_000000_file.txt" to
"YYMMDD_HHMMSS_000000_000000_file.txt" when it gets uploaded. All other files are automatically prepended with this
string. Manually renaming the file and then editing the elog entry via text editor seems to fix the file.
thanks,
amartin |
12458
|
Wed Mar 24 18:10:04 134 |
| | | | | | | |
675
|
Thu Aug 19 16:20:16 2004 |
| | | | | | | Here are some things for your wish list:
1) elogd should report quota or disk-full problem: In case a logbook
entry cannot be saved (quota or disk full) then a message like
'Could not save last entry. Please contact administrator.' should
be displayed. Currently nothing happens. Only the submitted
entries 'vanish'.
2) default page view per user, i.e. the 'Back' link goes to
?mode=Full,summary,... depending on the user that is logged in.
Some users complained that 'Back' is not really back. Maybe
consider renaming 'Back' to 'Default View' or something.
3) (related to 1) the 'Back' link should go back to the last used mode
(full, summary, threaded,...) and not to the default mode
4) mark messages as unread/read on a per user basis: The
implementation of this might be quite involved but it would be
rather useful. One way would be to add a default attribute 'Seen
by' to each entry, which lists the login names of the users. Or
files LOGIN_NAME.has_seen can be created which contain the entry
IDs of the viewed entries for each user.
5) alignment of attribute table (using <td colspan=2> for multi line
stuff): see elog:669 :)
You can count my vote for:
- Use "and" and "or" operands in queries
|
701
|
Wed Sep 15 00:16:19 2004 |
| | | | | | | I g |
707
|
Wed Sep 15 00:16:19 2004 |
| | | Question | Windows | 2.5.4-2 | Re: Use Email From not Working as Before... | I gave the user email address priority over the "Use email from" option, that
means only if the user does not have an email address, then the "Use email from"
value is used. Now I realize that the priority is maybe wrong, so I should give
the "use email from" switch the highest priority. Only if this flag is not
present, then the system uses the user's email address. If that one is not
present, too, then the system uses "elog@<host>".
I applied this change to the CVS version, so let me know if it is ok with you. |
726
|
Mon Oct 11 22:57:58 2004 |
| | | | | | | Hello to all,
i'm running ELOG on FreeBSD 5.2.
We've noticed an issue where e-mail notification from ELOG seem to
have their arrival time in the future, looks like it's about 13 hours ahead.
E-mail gateway to which ELOG posts its e-mail shows this e-mail transaction:
--------------------------------------------
Received: from elogunixbox.somewhere.net ([x.x.x.x]) by
mailunixbox.somewhere.net with SMTP id <143408>; Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:22:43
+1300
To: crypt0@somewhere.net
From: elogposter@somewhere.net
Subject: New ELOG entry
X-Mailer: Elog, Version 2.5.3
X-Elog-URL: http://elog.somewhere.net/somelogbook/47
X-Elog-submit-type: web|elog
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2004 12:26:28 -3736512
--------------------------------------------
The last line in that log seems to have some strange time zone offset
(-3736512)
Usually you'd see a GMT+13 (New Zealand time zone on summer time).
Here's ELOG's own logs of that same e-mail delivery:
--------------------------------------------
11-Oct-2004 12:26:28 [crypt0@somepc.internal.lan] {somelogbook} X-Mailer:
Elog, Version 2.5.3
11-Oct-2004 12:26:28 [crypt0@somepc.internal.lan] {somelogbook} X-Elog-URL:
http://elog.somewhere.net/somelogbook/47
11-Oct-2004 12:26:28 [crypt0@somepc.internal.lan] {somelogbook} X-Elog-
submit-type: web|elog
11-Oct-2004 12:26:28 [crypt0@somepc.internal.lan] {somelogbook} Date: Mon,
11 Oct 2004 12:26:28 -3736512
11-Oct-2004 12:26:28 [crypt0@somepc.internal.lan] {somelogbook} Content-
Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
--------------------------------------------
I noticed that there was a post talking about ELOG on MacOSx having some
time issues, but nothing mentioning FreeBSD..
Any ideas?
Thanks to all in advance.
GL. |
727
|
Tue Oct 12 10:54:04 2004 |
| | | | | | | It would be nice if elogd would recognise the whole of this as a link
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;138354 rather than
just the first bit. |
|