Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 797 of 801  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Authordown Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  245   Tue Mar 11 18:40:39 2003 Question Aamir Khanaamir@aamir.uk.comQuestion  Compile on AIX 5L
Dear Friends,

Anyone managed to compile elog on AIX 5.2 or 5.1 ... is there a binary 
anywhere?

new to "C"

kind regards Aamir
  67602   Tue Nov 5 23:21:52 2013 Question A.G. Schubertalexis4@stanford.eduBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

 

$ make

cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall  -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -w -c -o crypt.o src/crypt.c

cc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall  -I../mxml  -DHAVE_SSL -o elog src/elog.c crypt.o -lssl

src/elog.c:125:8: error: expected parameter declarator

size_t strlcpy(char *dst, const char *src, size_t size)

       ^

/usr/include/secure/_string.h:105:44: note: expanded from macro 'strlcpy'

  __builtin___strlcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz (dest))

                                           ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:39:62: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz'

#define __darwin_obsz(object) __builtin_object_size (object, _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 1 ? 1 : 0)

                                                             ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:30:32: note: expanded from macro '_USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL'

#    define _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 2

                               ^

src/elog.c:125:8: error: expected ')'

/usr/include/secure/_string.h:105:44: note: expanded from macro 'strlcpy'

  __builtin___strlcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz (dest))

                                           ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:39:62: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz'

#define __darwin_obsz(object) __builtin_object_size (object, _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 1 ? 1 : 0)

                                                             ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:30:32: note: expanded from macro '_USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL'

#    define _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL 2

                               ^

src/elog.c:125:8: note: to match this '('

/usr/include/secure/_string.h:105:44: note: expanded from macro 'strlcpy'

  __builtin___strlcpy_chk (dest, src, len, __darwin_obsz (dest))

                                           ^

/usr/include/secure/_common.h:39:53: note: expanded from macro '__darwin_obsz'

#define __darwin_obsz(object) __builtin_object_size (object, _USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL > 1 ? 1 : 0)

 

                                                    ^

  67605   Thu Nov 7 02:18:17 2013 Reply A.G. Schubertalexis4@stanford.eduBug reportMac OSX2.9.2-2494Re: Compilation failure on Mac OSX 10.9

Stefan Ritt wrote:

A.G. Schubert wrote:

When compiling elog on OSX 10.9 (Mavericks), I get the error below.

Elog will compile without error if I add -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=0 to CFLAGS in Makefile, but I'm not sure whether this is a good idea.

All over sudden gcc comes with its own version of "strlcpy", which I had defined "manually" since many years inside ELOG. Using -DFORTIFY_SOURCE=0 will not harm, so you can use it. The "real" solution is to take our ELOG's strlcpy/strlcat, which I did on the current SVN version.

Best regards,
Stefan 

Ok, I tried updating my SVN working copy, but I didn't get any updates past elog rev. 2494, mxml rev. 74.  I undid my changes to Makefile, tried to compile, but got the same errors.  

I then pulled down elog and mxml with git, and these are working for me with no errors.  Thanks!

  67252   Wed Apr 18 21:53:26 2012 Reply A. TuttleATuttle@UW.eduQuestionLinux2.9.1-2435Re: author field in reply
Look in https://midas.psi.ch/elog/config.html
--
Fun things to set are:
Preset on first reply <attribute> = <string>
and
Preset on reply <attribute> = <string>
  66822   Sat May 15 06:01:40 2010 Entry A. Martinamartin@example.comBug reportAllsvnattachment filename bug & Makefile issue
If I upload the file "000000_000000_file.txt", elog will chop the filename to "file.txt."  Also, this effects
the file's displayed "Uploaded" time.  It shows the file as being uploaded on: "Tue Nov 30 00:00:00 1999"

Note the attachment to this post.

----

Makefile has the line:

# flag for SSL support
USE_SSL    = 1

However setting USE_SSL = 0 does not prevent the openssl libraries from being used.  Same issue with USE_CRYPT.
 You have to comment them out.

Lines 76-85 of Makefile should be replaced with this:

ifdef USE_SSL
ifneq ($(USE_SSL), 0)
CFLAGS += -DHAVE_SSL
LIBS += -lssl
endif
endif

ifdef USE_CRYPT
ifneq ($(USE_CRYPT), 0)
CFLAGS += -DHAVE_CRYPT
LIBS += -lcrypt
endif
endif

Thanks,
amartin
Attachment 1: file.txt
  66830   Thu May 20 04:33:07 2010 Reply A. Martinamartin@example.comBug reportAllsvnRe: attachment filename bug & Makefile issue


> > If I upload the file "000000_000000_file.txt", elog will chop the filename to "file.txt."  Also, this effects
> > the file's displayed "Uploaded" time.  It shows the file as being uploaded on: "Tue Nov 30 00:00:00 1999"
> 
> Arghh! Why did you choose such a filename? This is the ELOG internal file format, which is YYMMDD_HHMMSS_name.ext. 
> For internal reasons (mainly for synchronization) the system checks every file name, and if it contains 6 numbers 
> followed by a "_" followed by 6 other numbers it thinks it's a valid date/time and uses that. Your time is however 
> 0.0.0000, that's why it gets converted to some date in 1999. Do you absolutely need this functionality? While I can 
> easily remove the interpretation of the date, it would break the synchronization functionality and I would have to 
> find some other method to pass the file date/time, which would be quite some work. So if it's not too important for 
> you, I would like to keep it as it is.
> 

Thank you for your response.  

I can certainly use another filename, but I'm curious why elog doesn't convert the filename "000000_000000_file.txt" to
"YYMMDD_HHMMSS_000000_000000_file.txt" when it gets uploaded.  All other files are automatically prepended with this
string.  Manually renaming the file and then editing the elog entry via text editor seems to fix the file.

thanks,
amartin
  12458   Wed Mar 24 18:10:04 134        
  675   Thu Aug 19 16:20:16 2004        
Here are some things for your wish list:                                        
                                                                                
1) elogd should report quota or disk-full problem:  In case a logbook           
   entry cannot be saved (quota or disk full) then a message like               
   'Could not save last entry.  Please contact administrator.' should           
   be displayed.  Currently nothing happens.  Only the submitted                
   entries 'vanish'.                                                            
                                                                                
2) default page view per user, i.e. the 'Back' link goes to                     
   ?mode=Full,summary,... depending on the user that is logged in.              
   Some users complained that 'Back' is not really back.  Maybe                 
   consider renaming 'Back' to 'Default View' or something.                     
                                                                                
3) (related to 1) the 'Back' link should go back to the last used mode          
   (full, summary, threaded,...) and not to the default mode                    
                                                                                
4) mark messages as unread/read on a per user basis: The                        
   implementation of this might be quite involved but it would be               
   rather useful.  One way would be to add a default attribute 'Seen            
   by' to each entry, which lists the login names of the users.  Or 
   files LOGIN_NAME.has_seen can be created which contain the entry 
   IDs of the viewed entries for each user.   
                                                                                
5) alignment of attribute table (using <td colspan=2> for multi line            
   stuff): see elog:669 :)                                                      
                                                                                
You can count my vote for:                                                      
                                                                                
- Use "and" and "or" operands in queries                                        
                                                                                
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6