> kill -HUP <pid>; sleep 2; kill <pid>

Thanks, I could reproduce the problem. It had to do that a SIGHUP aborts the select()
command, which some listen socket marked, so that elogd goes into an accept() call, waiting
there indefinitely (or until a new browser request arrives). I fixed that. New version
under CVS.

> So a configurable size limit seems appropriate, from which on 
> only 'Display attachment' is displayed.  And/Or, for files
> exceeding this limit, the first N (new config option) lines could be displayed.

Ok, I changed elogd such that only the first 1000 lines of inline attachments are
displayed, with a note of how many lines are truncated. By clicking on the attachment
name, one can still download the complete attachment. I guess the number of lines do
not have to be configurable, but if someone is not happy with the 1000 lines that could
be added.

> > > Couldn't one include the extra <table> tag only when there is really more than
> > > one attribute per line.  All other lines could then be aligned properly.

I added that code in revision 1.471.

Sorry for that. The idea is that the -4 is the minor number between releases
(mainly for bug fixes and impatient users (;-) ). I accidently overwrote the
-4 version several times when testing a new RPM building scheme, but I promise
to take more care in the future (:-)))

Having the CVS revision in the executable is however a good idea and I will
put it in.

> Stefan, would it be ok to add the "minor" revision level to the VERSION
> constant?  I've been doing this after I download source just so I can keep
> things straight, you keep cranking out versions ;->
> 
> EX: 
> #define VERSION "2.5.4-4"
> BECOMES
> #define VERSION "2.5.4-4-1.483" or something like that?
> 
> Just a thought.
> 
> Thanks

That problem has been fixed in 2.5.4-5

> W

> We are trying to use ELog on Windows XP with Protection on individual log 
> book and we unable to login after creating users even if we give correct 
> user name and password login screen reappears. We are able to log in to the 
> Elog when we use windows 98 Client we are running Elog on Windows XP and 
> without password protection on logbook it is working fine with windows 98.
> 
> For win xp clients we are using winxp sp 1, ie 6.1 using a proxy server

First, upgrade to 2.5.4-5 (if you haven't done so). If the problem persists,
please start elogd on the server with the "-v" flag, capture the screen output
and send it to me by email so that I can have a look. Please send also your
elogd.cfg file.

- Stefan

> W