| ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
|
68730
|
Thu Feb 1 10:14:55 2018 |
 | Andreas Luedeke | andreas.luedeke@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.9.2->3.1.3 | Re: v3.1.3 does not work with logbooks from v2.9.2? | Hi Yves,
just my two pence, maybe they help you to figure out what's going on:
versions 2.* had all entries of one logbook in one directory. Version 3.* create a subdirectory for each year. This had been added for me: if you use AFS for logbook storage, then you have a limit on how many files you can put into a single directory.
So the first time you start elogd 3.* with data from an elogd 2.* it should move all your logbook entries into sub-directories for each year. If that would have happened, you would not be able to use these logbook directories with the 2.9.2 version.
Maybe your logbook client is not allowed to create sub-directories? Although I would guess that it then would just throw an error message and stop.
Cheers, Andreas
| Yves wrote: |
|
I have just upgraded elog from 2.9.2 -> 3.1.3.
3.1.3 runs fine with new logbooks. However, when trying to run 3.1.3 with my logbooks created with 2.9.2 things stop working.
Here is the command I run for testing [attachment 1]: first of all it takes a very long time (~ 10 minutes) for it to index the logbooks. When finished indexing I try it out in a web browser - it takes infinite time to load: no error message appears but also no logbook. After an hour or so elogd crashes without an error message.
When running 2.9.2 on the same machine, all runs wel (attachment 2)
cfd file: (I only left in one logbook - they are all configured the same)
[global]
port = 18080
Logging level = 3
Max content length = 500000000
Date format = %A, %d %B %Y
[Logrun - Amptek]
Theme = default
Comment = Logrun Amptec
Reverse sort = 0
Quick filter = Date, Type
Any ideas on how to solve this?
|
|
|
65894
|
Mon Jun 2 12:17:53 2008 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | | Re: using elog client in secure mode |
| Luc Goossens wrote: |
|
I am trying to enter a log record in secure mode into a log book hosted on an apache server (v2.7.2).
[atlt0dev@voatlas04]~% elog -v -s -h prod-grid-logger.cern.ch -p 443 -u myuser -w mypassword -d elog -l "ATLAS+Tier0+Operations+Logbook" -a Subject=foobar
|
Your problem is the wrong password parameter. The "-w" password is only if a write password is defined in the config file. If the user level access is chosen however, you have to specify the username/password pair only separated by a blank such as in
elog ... -u myuser mypwassword ...
|
|
67745
|
Mon Jan 12 11:24:00 2015 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.9.2-2455 | Re: using a predefined format with predefined informations that an user should fill at each run of data | In ELOG you can define "attributes", so take one attribute for each informaiton you need. The flag these attributes as required via "Required attributes = ...". If you only want this attributes for certain occations (like data taking in your case), you can either do a separato logbook for data taking, or use "conditional attributes" to make these attributes only show up for data taking.
/Stefan
| Iolanda Matea wrote: |
|
Hello!
I was wondering if it is possible (and how) to define a template (something equivalent to an excel table with some required informations to be filled) that opens each time one wants to make a new entry of a given type, e.g., I want this template to open only when the informations concern data taking.
I hope I am sufficiently clear ...
Thank you,
I.M.
|
|
|
416
|
Sun Jul 27 16:09:09 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 2.3.9 | Re: using = or <> or AND as part of a filter ?? | > Is this possible? If so, could you provide an example:
>
> I'm trying to find a way that when you do a search, that you can filter
> entries using ( = , <>, AND) on one or more attributes.
> ex: Find all workstations for this subnet, but exclude a particular one.
> Thats the basic idea.
>
> Can it be done? If so, how?
No, it cannot be done right now, but it's on the wishlist since some time.
So I added your vote there. |
|
1255
|
Mon Jul 11 12:40:13 2005 |
 | Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Here I am again 
My goal is to put a "Co-Authors" Attribute in my logbook, giving the possibility to other people in the control room to have credits about an entry... I added a "Co-Author" attribute, but It shold permit a "multliple" selection (a checkbox is not good) ... the perfect solution would be to add the attribute "multiple" to the <select> tag, and filling the elog Attribute value with a comma separated list of the selections ...
tnx in advance |
Have you tried MOptions ... which gives you check boxes where more than one can be selected?
I presume you have, but you really would prefer a multi-selection box instead of multiple check boxes  . Well, let's make a deal: if you explain everybody how to do a selection in a multi-select box (with all the Shift-Click, CTRL-Click, and this under different operating systems), I will implement it  |
|
1258
|
Mon Jul 11 14:35:00 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | Here I am again
My goal is to put a "Co-Authors" Attribute in my logbook, giving the possibility to other people in the control room to have credits about an entry... I added a "Co-Author" attribute, but It shold permit a "multliple" selection (a checkbox is not good) ... the perfect solution would be to add the attribute "multiple" to the <select> tag, and filling the elog Attribute value with a comma separated list of the selections ...
tnx in advance |
Have you tried MOptions ... which gives you check boxes where more than one can be selected?
I presume you have, but you really would prefer a multi-selection box instead of multiple check boxes . Well, let's make a deal: if you explain everybody how to do a selection in a multi-select box (with all the Shift-Click, CTRL-Click, and this under different operating systems), I will implement it |
a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO 
My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
|
1261
|
Tue Jul 12 15:19:07 2005 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO |
Really? Can you point me to a common web site using this? I would really like to see how other people use this.
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
Ok, I put it on my wishlist. If more than one person asks for this, I will implement it. Unfortunately it's not only putting a multiple into the HTML page, it's also a different way how multiple selections are passed in the POST form and their decoding, so it will be an hour or two of work for me. |
|
1263
|
Wed Jul 13 10:12:38 2005 |
| Emiliano Gabrielli | AlberT@SuperAlberT.it | Request | All | | Re: userlist multiple select |
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | a multiple selection box it's a standard web tool .. if one is not able to use its browser is not an elog problem IMHO |
Really? Can you point me to a common web site using this? I would really like to see how other people use this.
|
I can't remember just now a web site using it .. what I mean is that "multiple" attribute for the "select" tag is a standard for the web (it's not an IE extension or so on ..) so every web browser implements it.
It's normally used, for example, when you fill a form describing your attitudes, here you can often choose from a select box a number of interest you are concerded.. but it is only an example
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | | My request is becouse having a number of user (say 20) makes the checkbox solution very very nasty .. again, it's a choice you give to the smart user .. others simply will not notice any change in elog |
Ok, I put it on my wishlist. If more than one person asks for this, I will implement it. Unfortunately it's not only putting a multiple into the HTML page, it's also a different way how multiple selections are passed in the POST form and their decoding, so it will be an hour or two of work for me. |
Yes I know, uhm... if you point me to the right piece of code to be adjusted I can see if I'll be able to do the job |
|