Paid version , posted by Vasio on Mon Jul 4 12:32:01 2022
|
Good day all ,
does Elog has a paid version that is not open soureced
|
Slow performance, posted by Alan Grant on Tue Jun 28 18:53:50 2022
|
We're up to 30 logbooks, 3.2GB data total and Elog damen has now become slow. Performance stats show 100%CPU on startup then reduces. Searches and
general UI activity is slow. It runs on a VM with 4GB memory allocated. Up to 15 concurrent users.
Trimming and archiving some data files may help but I gather overall this is underpowered hardware in this instance so what is recommended |
Re: Slow performance, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Sat Jul 2 14:39:41 2022
|
We have 68 logbooks and currently 60 GB data total. We run it as well on a VM, in our case with 8GB RAM.
The speed of ELOG is mostly given by the filesystem: when we had AFS it was very slow. With NFS it was better. But we now use a local disk
on the VM: that is much better. |
|
Edit entry from command line and appending attachment, posted by Andrea Capra on Sun Jun 26 01:47:02 2022
|
I would like to edit an existing entry by adding new attachments at each call of elog
from the command line.
If I issue |
ladp Invalid user name or password!, posted by Fred Nerks on Wed May 11 09:54:17 2022
|
Hi I am running elog on windows 2022 server and trying to use ldap for Auth.
No matter what i do I cannot get it to authenticate against the DC.
Invalid user name or password! |
|
Re: ladp Invalid user name or password!, posted by Fred Nerks on Mon May 23 07:48:40 2022
|
Fred
Nerks wrote:
Hi I am running elog on windows 2022 server and trying to use ldap |
PDF preview special steps to enable, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Fri May 6 21:12:11 2022
|
Ubuntu LTS 20.04 and others have elog PDF preview disabled by default. To enable,
please follow these steps, see https://daq00.triumf.ca/DaqWiki/index.php/Ubuntu#Enable_elog_PDF_preview
|
Re: PDF preview special steps to enable, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 10 22:40:26 2022 
|
I have a PDF file created by root which ImageMagic cannot convert to a .png file. If I do
convert img.pdf img.png
|
|
elog root path, posted by Antonio Bulgheroni on Thu May 5 11:14:20 2022
|
Dear all,
I have a question for you. On my elog server I have plenty of images not included in any logbook entry, but that nevertheless I would the user
to have access to that via the browser. In order words, I would like to have a link like this https://myelog/my_pics_folder/my_pic.png |
|
Vulnerability?, posted by Alessandro Petrolini on Thu Mar 3 08:26:40 2022
|
Hi, I have been using elog for years at CERN.
Now I installed in my local workstation at my home inistitue
and sysadmin reported the following vulnerabilities: |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Thu Mar 3 16:49:40 2022
|
The CVEs you refer to are very old and have been fixed a long time ago.
Please refer to:
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Alessandro Petrolini on Fri Mar 4 08:51:24 2022
|
Ok, many many thanks!
I will pass the info to my sysadmin.
Best Regards.
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Alessandro Petrolini on Sun Mar 6 09:00:33 2022
|
> Ok, many many thanks!
> I will pass the info to my sysadmin.
> Best Regards.
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Sun Mar 6 17:33:04 2022
|
> > > The CVEs you refer to are very old and have been fixed a long time ago.
>
> Am I wrong that the windows executable version on the site is dated 2018? 3.1.4-2?
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Mar 7 08:49:41 2022
|
> I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Mon Mar 7 14:30:16 2022
|
>
> Yeah, I have to recompile the Windows version. Unfortunately my old Windows PC is gone, I
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Mon Mar 7 17:46:39 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Wed Mar 9 17:55:31 2022
|
I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables |
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 19 15:47:59 2022
|
> I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Tue Apr 19 17:02:57 2022
|
> > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Daniel Pfuhl on Tue Apr 19 20:13:04 2022
|
> > > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Jan Just Keijser on Fri Apr 22 17:10:24 2022
|
> > > > I've built the last C version of elog in git, revision 1ebfd06c using mingw-64 ; the resulting binaries work for me on Windows 2019.
> > > > Attached is a zip file with the binaries.
> > > > I was not able to create a new installer, these are just the executables
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Laurent Jean-Rigaud on Mon Mar 7 22:07:54 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Florian Heigl on Mon Apr 18 19:16:36 2022
|
> > I trust Stefan is reading this thread and will do something about it. My vote would
> > be to remove the download link to the windows executables and ask Debian to remove
> > the elog package. I think they have a way for upstream developers (Stefan) to request
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 19 21:15:19 2022
|
> it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/
> It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Fri Apr 22 21:15:37 2022
|
> > debian package still outdated?
> We reached to the package maintainer
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 26 17:39:49 2022
|
> > > debian package still outdated?
> removed from debian-unstable
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/elog
|
|
history of long-removed freebsd package, Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Tue Apr 26 18:03:03 2022
|
> > > > debian package still outdated?
the freebsd elog package was removed back in 2014 during
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Wed Apr 27 19:36:25 2022
|
> next is to request removal of ubuntu package.
contacted ubuntu security team, got very quick response.
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Fri Apr 22 12:55:21 2022
|
> it would be good if the current state was listed in https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Vulnerabilities/
> It seems there's now updated builds for at least windows, and the debian package still outdated?
|
|
Re: Vulnerability?, posted by Konstantin Olchanski on Sat Apr 23 18:05:57 2022
|
> The CVEs you refer to are very old and have been fixed a long time ago.
>
> Please refer to:
|
|
Download attachments from command line, posted by Maarten de Jong on Sat Apr 16 10:37:24 2022
|
| Would it be possible to download attachments (e.g. with elog or wget) from the command line? |
|
Re: Download attachments from command line, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Apr 19 10:24:47 2022
|
Sure. Just figure out the URL from your browser and then use it in wget, e.g.
wget https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/220309_175728/elog-3.1.4-1ebfd06c-win64.zip
to download one attachement from this forum. |
|
Re: Download attachments from command line, posted by Maarten de Jong on Thu Apr 21 14:19:35 2022
|
Thanks - I can confirm that the given command works.
However, for an e-log with username and password protection, this no longer seems to work.
It would be very useful if the elog command can be used to also download attachments (and not only a message). |