Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 196 of 236  Not logged in ELOG logo
icon1.gif   Incorrect Display, posted by David Spindler on Sat May 21 15:05:23 2005 capture-firefox-1.03.JPG
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.
    icon1.gif   Re: Incorrect Display, posted by David Spindler on Sat May 21 15:23:08 2005 capture-firefox-1.03-log-entry.JPG

David Spindler wrote:
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.

BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote:
"Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>"
       icon1.gif   Re: Incorrect Display, posted by David Spindler on Mon May 23 17:47:24 2005 
Never mind. I figured it out. I used two fields (date and time) that are automatically placed in elog. It messed up the spacing, altough what was puzzling was that it displayed correctly on the entry itself, but not the list. Anyway, I renamed the date and time to another name and it is ok.

Thanks, anyway. Keep up the good work.


David Spindler wrote:

David Spindler wrote:
I hope this is the correct place for an apparent bug report. The display is incorrect except when displaying a particular entry. I just downloaded 2.6.0-beta thinking I was getting 2.5.9. Nice surprise. The elcode (bbcode? ) is a great idea, but the display, when showing the main screen of a logbook does not have the correct fields showing in the correct places. I will attach two screen captures for illustraton. Never mind, I guess not. It is not letting me upload the screen captures. On the main screen, for example, my field contents for "Route" appear in the "Text" field. But when on the specific entry screen, these field contents are in the correct field. I will be glad to eamil the screen captures, if anyone wants.

I am running Firefox 1.0.3 (same results with IE 6, BTW), on a WinXP OS (sorry fellows, but I am still in process of learning Linux, so I have not tried this version of elog on it, yet), on a Gateway 2.2 GHZ, 1 GB RAM PC.


BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


I guess it did upload. Here is the other screen capture.

BTW, I received the following message upon submitting my last post:
Quote:
"Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: <>"
          icon1.gif   Re: Incorrect Display, posted by Geoffrey Carman on Fri Jun 3 17:34:44 2005 

David Spindler wrote:

BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


We just did the 2.60 beta upgrade, and now our pre-existing logbooks, with a
List Display = Name, Author, Date for example will only show the first two fields.

It seems like Elog is dropping the last attribute in the List Display line.

We can 'fix' it by making it say:
List Display = Name, Author, Date, Date
so that it drops the second Date, but that is a bad workaround.

Anyone else seeing this?

Elog 2.60 beta on Linux, Firefox 1.04 as the client. Or IE fully patched on WinXP SP2.

PS: Love Elog at work here too! Truly has made our documentation way better. And RSS feeds of the logbooks is just wonderful.
             icon1.gif   Re: Incorrect Display, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Fri Jun 3 18:02:25 2005 

Geoffrey Carman wrote:

David Spindler wrote:

BTW, I love elog and have it running at work. It is being used extensively.


We just did the 2.60 beta upgrade, and now our pre-existing logbooks, with a
List Display = Name, Author, Date for example will only show the first two fields.

It seems like Elog is dropping the last attribute in the List Display line.

We can 'fix' it by making it say:
List Display = Name, Author, Date, Date
so that it drops the second Date, but that is a bad workaround.

Anyone else seeing this?

Elog 2.60 beta on Linux, Firefox 1.04 as the client. Or IE fully patched on WinXP SP2.

PS: Love Elog at work here too! Truly has made our documentation way better. And RSS feeds of the logbooks is just wonderful.


I just reported it to Stefan last week ... it's the "pippo-bug" Smile I called it this way becouse you can put anything you want as garbage Attribute to go around the bug .. I temporary corrected my elogs configs addig a ", pippo" to every "List Display" line ...
                icon2.gif   Re: Incorrect Display, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jun 4 10:59:52 2005 
I finally found some time to fix the pippo-bug Wink.

It had to do with the request that one can turn on and off the summary lines of the text body in Guest list display. So if this option does not contain Text, the text summary is not shown for guest access, but only for registered access. This modification had the side effect that one column was dropped on the non-guest access.
icon1.gif   Problem with auto-increment attribute, posted by Andy on Tue May 24 20:32:08 2005 
I have a very strange problem with auto-increment attribute. Here is a part of my configuration:

Attributes = Access ID, Harvest Date, Access, Species, PI, Submission date, Stain, Comments
Preset Access ID = MI-05-%03d
Type Harvest date = date
Type Submission date = date

I tried to add new entry, and it's Access ID is MI-05-001. But when I'm adding another entries,
there Access ID is MI-05-006
I found only one mention of using increment in documentation.
What I'm doing wrong?
icon4.gif   error message from this forum, posted by Heiko Scheit on Wed May 18 14:20:23 2005 
Just after submitting the last message, the following error message was displayed:

Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: synergie-infcom>
    icon2.gif   Re: error message from this forum, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 18 19:52:41 2005 

Heiko Scheit wrote:
Just after submitting the last message, the following error message was displayed:

Error sending Email via "mailsend.psi.ch": malformed address: synergie-infcom>


Sombody used an invalid formed email address, like user<at>domain<dot>com, on which the SMTP server complained. I would like to note here that the email addresses registered in this forum are not published in any way, so there is no risk to get spam from that (except the normal elog notifications, which can be turned off easily).
icon5.gif   post box question, posted by damon nettles on Sat May 7 17:51:22 2005 
is there any way to get a larger text box to type in when making a new post?
the default box is rather small and you have to scroll up and down when
making a new post or editing an existing one.

once the post is submitted, the display goes to a larger box, but the text
only takes up the left side of the page. seems the only way to get it to go
all the way to the right is to make everything html and submit it that way.

can the normal text look like the html does without submitting it as html?
    icon2.gif   Re: post box question, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 11:30:07 2005 
> is there any way to get a larger text box to type in when making a new post?
> the default box is rather small and you have to scroll up and down when
> making a new post or editing an existing one.

Message width = <number of characters>
Message height = <number of lines>
 
> can the normal text look like the html does without submitting it as html?

No. 
       icon2.gif   Re: post box question, posted by damon nettles on Thu May 12 18:32:18 2005 
> > is there any way to get a larger text box to type in when making a new post?
> > the default box is rather small and you have to scroll up and down when
> > making a new post or editing an existing one.
> 
> Message width = <number of characters>
> Message height = <number of lines>
>  
> > can the normal text look like the html does without submitting it as html?
> 
> No. 

thanks stefan. it looks like it was right in front of my face the whole time (on
the elogd.cfg syntax page). but, somehow i missed it.
icon5.gif   elogd crashes on log out, posted by Kevin Robinder on Wed Apr 27 21:27:25 2005 
Since updating to version 2.5.8 we have been having problems with the elogd 
service crashing whenever anyone attempts to log out. We are using stunnel 
4.09 on a Win 2k system.

When someone tries to log out of e-log from their desktop the machine 
hosting the service throws an error popup wanting to report to Microsoft. 
The error signature has the following information:

szAppName: elogd.exe
szAppVer: 0.0.0.0
szModName: elogd.exe
szMidVer: 0.0.0.0
offset: 0003586a

Clicking to get the technical information it wants to send it shows these 
two file names:

C:\DocumentsandSettings\krobinde\LOCALS~1\temp\WER6F.tmp.dir00
\elogd.exe.mdmp
C:\DocumentsandSettings\krobinde\LOCALS~1\temp\WER6F.tmp.dir00\appcompat.txt

Let me know if there is any further information you need.
    icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 29 21:30:26 2005 
It's hard to tell the problem from what you report. Have you tried the latest
release http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elog258-6.exe ? There were
some problems with the password file in 2.5.8 versions prior to patch level 6.
       icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Kevin Robinder on Sat Apr 30 19:10:22 2005 
> It's hard to tell the problem from what you report. Have you tried the latest
> release http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elog258-6.exe ? There were
> some problems with the password file in 2.5.8 versions prior to patch level 6.

Yes, I am up to date with the latest version (2.5.8-6).

What other information can I provide that might assist in diagnosing this?
          icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 2 09:33:51 2005 
> What other information can I provide that might assist in diagnosing this?

Please send me your elogd.cfg configuration file.
             icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Matt B on Fri May 6 18:41:04 2005 elogd.cfg
> > What other information can I provide that might assist in diagnosing this?
> 
> Please send me your elogd.cfg configuration file.

Stefan - I am having the exact same problem as outlined here. I sent you an
email with a somewhat complicated config file. Attached to this message is a
much simpler one. 

With this file, if you remove the B5 server (remove it from top group a2, and
remove the [b5] entry) the crash does not happen. If the B5 server (or any
additional server) is in the file, then the problem occurs.

For me, there are 3 places where the crash happens:
- on logout
- when an invalid username/password is used to login
- when you login to A1, then try to go to A2

This is happening on elog v2.5.9-1 (built May 2, 2005, 12:17:18 revision 1.642)

I have tried on windows 2000 and 2003 servers, and it seems to happen on both of
them.

Matt
                icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Matt B on Fri May 6 20:32:49 2005 
Another quick update on this, it looks like the bug was introduced in version
2.5.8-2 built Mar 30 2005, 11:04:33, revision 1.611

version 2.5.8-1 built Mar 21 2005, 17:28:54, revision 1.592 does not exhibit the
behavior.


Matt
    icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 13:12:26 2005 
> Since updating to version 2.5.8 we have been having problems with the elogd 
> service crashing whenever anyone attempts to log out. We are using stunnel 
> 4.09 on a Win 2k system.

This problem has finally been identified and fixed. Please download the newest
version 2.5.9-2 which contains this fix.
       icon2.gif   Re: elogd crashes on log out, posted by Kevin Robinder on Wed May 11 21:39:12 2005 
> > Since updating to version 2.5.8 we have been having problems with the elogd 
> > service crashing whenever anyone attempts to log out. We are using stunnel 
> > 4.09 on a Win 2k system.
> 
> This problem has finally been identified and fixed. Please download the newest
> version 2.5.9-2 which contains this fix.

I will get right on this. Thank you for your efforts!
icon5.gif   Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:23:59 2005 
What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 

Thanks  
    icon2.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 20:47:02 2005 
> What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
> the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 

Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)

I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.
       icon2.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:51:23 2005 
> > What is the recommended version of gcc to use with elog 2.5.9?  I searched
> > the discussion database but found nothing pertaining to this. 
> 
> Well, the same code compiles on gcc and on Visual C++ under Windows, so
> hopefully there is no dependence on the gcc version (;-)
> 
> I use gcc 3.2.3 on Scientific Linux 3.03.

I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
          icon2.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 20:55:36 2005 
> I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.

mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
into a separate directory:

...
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke          0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
-rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke        567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h

I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
occuring there.
             icon14.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 20:58:11 2005 
> > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
> 
> mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
> into a separate directory:
> 
> ...
> -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
> -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
> drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke          0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
> -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
> -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
> -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
> -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke        567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h
> 
> I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
> occuring there.

Ah, now I need to figure out how to pickup the new includes.  
BTW, personally I wouldn't take my word regarding the 3.4 errors -- I was simply
trying an alternative version and it is likely that the way ours is configured is the
problem.

Thanks!
                icon14.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:08:56 2005 
> > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
> > 
> > mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
> > into a separate directory:
> > 
> > ...
> > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
> > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
> > drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke          0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
> > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
> > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
> > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
> > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke        567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h
> > 
> > I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
> > occuring there.
> 
> Ah, now I need to figure out how to pickup the new includes.  
> BTW, personally I wouldn't take my word regarding the 3.4 errors -- I was simply
> trying an alternative version and it is likely that the way ours is configured is the
> problem.
> 
> Thanks!


Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
under the created directory elog-2.5.9).  Is there a reason why these includes are not
placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?
                   icon5.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 21:14:53 2005 
> > > > I ask because I get a dependency that I did not have before with 2.5.3. 
> > > > Compiling with my same 'ole gcc 2.95.2 I see that I now need mxml.h and
> > > > strlcpy.h.  Trying to compile under gcc 3.4 results in all kinds of errors.
> > > 
> > > mxml.h and strlcpy.h are part of the elog tar ball. When untar'ed, they get copied
> > > into a separate directory:
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      15090 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.japanese
> > > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      17587 2005-05-09 13:09:54 elog-2.5.9/eloglang.spanish
> > > drwxr-xr-x ritt/lke          0 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/
> > > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke      45577 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.c
> > > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       2198 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.c
> > > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke       4359 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/mxml.h
> > > -rwxr-xr-x ritt/lke        567 2005-05-09 13:09:54 mxml/strlcpy.h
> > > 
> > > I have right now no access to 3.4. Once I get it, I will address the errors
> > > occuring there.
> > 
> > Ah, now I need to figure out how to pickup the new includes.  
> > BTW, personally I wouldn't take my word regarding the 3.4 errors -- I was simply
> > trying an alternative version and it is likely that the way ours is configured is the
> > problem.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> 
> 
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9).  Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?


Ack, ok, I moved the includes into src and tried re-compiling -- and received several
"undefined symbol" errors from the linker.  Clearly the libraries cannot be moved into src?
                   icon14.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:17:29 2005 
> Ok, now I see the issue - the tar extract created the mxml directory in the root (not
> under the created directory elog-2.5.9).  Is there a reason why these includes are not
> placed in the src dir like the regex.h/.c include?

Yes. I use these files in several other projects as well, and want to maintain only a
single copy. So I have

elogd-x.x.x/
elogd-x.x.x/src/
....
mxml/
mxml/strlcpy.h
mxml/strlcpy.c
mxml/mxml.c
mxml/mxml.c
...
other-project-x.x.x/
other-project-x.x.x/

So both elogd and "other-project" can use strlcpy.c and mxml.c. If I would copy it to
elogd-x.x.x/src and fix a bug there, "other-project" would use a separate copy and not
profit from the bug fix. So I would have to mainain verious copies of the same file, which
make things complicated. I compile everything also under windows, so I cannot use soft
links. If there is a better way of how to do it, please let me know.
                      icon2.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 21:22:46 2005 
[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
elog-2.5.9/
elog-2.5.9/doc/
elog-2.5.9/doc/adminguide.html
...
mxml/
mxml/mxml.c
mxml/strlcpy.c
mxml/mxml.h
mxml/strlcpy.h
[ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ cd elog-2.5.9
[ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$ make
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elog src/elog.c
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o regex.o src/regex.c
... skipping warnings ...
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o mxml.o ../mxml/mxml.c
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o strlcpy.o ../mxml/strlcpy.c
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -I../mxml -o elogd src/elogd.c regex.o
mxml.o strlcpy.o
gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elconv src/elconv.c
[ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$

--------------
No undefined functions here. I guess you have an old Makefile? Just use the complete tar
package from the last version.
                         icon14.gif   Re: Version of GCC to use?, posted by Steve Jones on Mon May 9 23:30:11 2005 
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ tar -xzvf elog-2.5.9-2.tar.gz
> elog-2.5.9/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/
> elog-2.5.9/doc/adminguide.html
> ...
> mxml/
> mxml/mxml.c
> mxml/strlcpy.c
> mxml/mxml.h
> mxml/strlcpy.h
> [ritt@pc5082 /tmp]$ cd elog-2.5.9
> [ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$ make
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elog src/elog.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o regex.o src/regex.c
> ... skipping warnings ...
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o mxml.o ../mxml/mxml.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -c -o strlcpy.o ../mxml/strlcpy.c
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -I../mxml -o elogd src/elogd.c regex.o
> mxml.o strlcpy.o
> gcc -O3 -funroll-loops -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -o elconv src/elconv.c
> [ritt@pc5082 elog-2.5.9]$
> 
> --------------
> No undefined functions here. I guess you have an old Makefile? Just use the complete tar
> package from the last version.

Ok, now I have it.  Old Makefile because I had to perform some deletions to make "make" work
right under Solaris.  Basically, I took out the ifdef structures - "make" was blowing up on
these.  Everything now compiles perfectly -- don't change anything.  Thanks for that last pointer.

Steve
icon5.gif   link loss and crash of elogd.exe, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Mon May 9 17:59:09 2005 
Just upgraded from stable running 2.5.2-2 to 2.5.9-2 in case of the usable
Duplicate function. After the problem discribed below i made a new, clean
installation again and played araound with the demo logbook, copying my
testlogbook (part of a real used and under 2.5.2-2 working logbook) into the
demo cfg file. 

ia figured out two serious problems:

1. If I copy the following section to the global into the demo lgbook,
elogd.exe crashes emediatly ewhile starting as a prozess:

[global]
Language = German
Theme = default
logbook tabs = 1
main tab = INHALT
welcome title = <b><big>Ulrich Rolf Trüssel</big></b>
Adressverwaltung (Geschäft & Privat)
Mensch-Tier Coaching&trade;&nbsp;&nbsp;-&nbsp;&nbsp;Mensch-Hund Coaching&trade;
Interessengemeinschaft Familienhund&reg; - Regionalgruppe Zentralschweiz
Lorenz Tierschule port = 8080 Theme = default Message Width = 100 Message Height = 25 Filtered browsing = 1 Suppress default = 2 Suppress Email on Edit = 0 Email Format = 0 Filtered browsing = 1 HTML default = 3 Reverse sort = 1 2. problem (the ting) that made me playing with teh demo cfg: There are totally 8 logbooks running, but just one has this strange problem of not giving a link to to the datasets in full and summary mode. I cutted down all the stuff back to this only lines: [Adresse2] Attributes = Kundensegment, Duzis, Hauptadresse, Selektion, Sperre, Adresse, Unterlagenversand, Empf. gegeben, Gruppe, Mitglied, URT, IGFH, Letzte Anmeldung, IGFH Gruppe, IGFH JB, Anrede, Titel, Briefanrede, Vorname, Name, Firma, Abteilung, Adresse Zusatz, Strasse, Landeskennung, PLZ, Ortschaft, Postfach, Postfach PLZ, Postfach Ort, Telefon Geschäft, Telefon Privat, Telefax, Telefon Mobil, EMail, HomePage, Funktion, Beruf, Geburtstag, Name Hund, Rasse, Sex, Wurfdatum, Anmeldung, Impfbüchlein, Welpenkurs, Erziehungskurs, Hundesport, Bestätigung, OCCH LN, Andere Kurse, Weitere Hunde/Tiere, Referenzen, KlientIn/KundIn List Display = Name, Vorname and got still the same problem. if i create a new logbook it will works, also ut works under 2.5.2-2 but not longer under 2.5.3 up (even not 2.5.9-2). any idea? mening this may be a VERY basic logbook... trued with list display etc. around, nothinh happen. Need to go back to 2.5.2-2 where this wasn't a problem? thanjs for any idea of this to problems...
icon5.gif   How to remove email addresses from Guest Display?, posted by Johan Nyberg on Mon May 9 11:45:05 2005 
Hi,

I would like to have the author email addresses listed only for users which
have logged in, but not for guest users. In the elogd.cfg file I have:

Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Subject
Guest Display = Author, Category, Subject, Text

But these attributes

  ID Date Author Author Email Category Subject Text

are shown also when visting the logbook as a guest. For the guests I would
like to show only these attributes

  ID Date Author Category Subject Text

Any ideas what I am doing wrong or why this does not work?

Johan
    icon2.gif   Re: How to remove email addresses from Guest Display?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 9 14:46:54 2005 
> I would like to have the author email addresses listed only for users which
> have logged in, but not for guest users. In the elogd.cfg file I have:
> 
> Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Subject
> Guest Display = Author, Category, Subject, Text
> 
> But these attributes
> 
>   ID Date Author Author Email Category Subject Text
> 
> are shown also when visting the logbook as a guest. For the guests I would
> like to show only these attributes
> 
>   ID Date Author Category Subject Text
> 
> Any ideas what I am doing wrong or why this does not work?

Guest List Display = Author, Category, Subject, Text
      ^^^^

- Stefan
       icon7.gif   Re: How to remove email addresses from Guest Display?, posted by Johan Nyberg on Mon May 9 16:37:08 2005 
> > I would like to have the author email addresses listed only for users which
> > have logged in, but not for guest users. In the elogd.cfg file I have:
> > 
> > Attributes = Author, Author Email, Category, Subject
> > Guest Display = Author, Category, Subject, Text
> > 
> > But these attributes
> > 
> >   ID Date Author Author Email Category Subject Text
> > 
> > are shown also when visting the logbook as a guest. For the guests I would
> > like to show only these attributes
> > 
> >   ID Date Author Category Subject Text
> > 
> > Any ideas what I am doing wrong or why this does not work?
> 
> Guest List Display = Author, Category, Subject, Text
>       ^^^^
> 
> - Stefan

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for the prompt answer and sorry for not reading the docs carefully enough.
The "Guest List Display" is of course what I should use. It works perfectly. And
thanks for the fantastic and very useful ELOG package!

Johan
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6