Logfiles, posted by becher on Tue Mar 29 23:03:35 2005
|
Is there an option that elog creates one logfile for one entry in the
database? It seems that there elog is creating one logfile for one day. |
Re: Logfiles, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 29 23:05:56 2005
|
> Is there an option that elog creates one logfile for one entry in the
> database? It seems that there elog is creating one logfile for one day.
|
|
Re: Logfiles, posted by Becher on Wed Mar 30 16:05:34 2005
|
I want exchange the logs as files and not with the mirroring function. My
collegue and me are already exchanging all our project files, so the logs from
ELOG could be included in this exchange. |
|
Re: Logfiles, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 30 16:31:36 2005
|
> I want exchange the logs as files and not with the mirroring function. My
> collegue and me are already exchanging all our project files, so the logs from
> ELOG could be included in this exchange.
|
|
Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Wed Mar 16 16:13:15 2005
|
Hi,
Is there a command line in the configuration files to show all of sub logs
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Fri Mar 25 12:49:13 2005 
|
> Hi,
>
> Is there a command line in the configuration files to show all of sub
|
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 29 09:57:29 2005
|
> So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
> So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
> thanks for answers.
|
Re: Expand all at elog home, posted by Alex H on Wed Mar 30 15:12:54 2005
|
> > So I have posted a picture to explain better my question.
> > So could it be possible to have the index page always expanded ?
> > thanks for answers.
|
|
Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by mark james on Tue Mar 22 12:03:04 2005
|
I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
|
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Mar 22 13:46:57 2005
|
> I have defined a new field called "Record Date" to accept the dates from a
> previous logging system. I am not too concerned with the timestamp
> associated with these old imported entries. But for new entries...
|
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by mark james on Tue Mar 22 23:27:21 2005
|
Stefan,
Oh. OK. I will keep tuned. It would be quite useful to have.
|
|
Re: Unable to enter/edit time in user defined $date field?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 30 11:07:08 2005
|
I implemented a "datetime" option which does exactly what you want. All you
need is a
|
wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:29:51 2005
|
When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 12:54:51 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 23 20:35:55 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 10:51:10 2005
|
> > When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> > display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
> >
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 25 00:33:51 2005
|
> It seems that uploading files with spaces in the name *now* works well... so the
> problem should be somewhere in the handling of existing attachments, not rised when
> the attachment is uploaded with the current version of elog ... it's quite strange
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 13:40:27 2005
|
> When an attached image name contains a space in its filename and attachment
> display is enabled elog builds a wrong url to the image:
>
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 25 00:30:57 2005
|
> - Irestarted the daemon
> - attached strace to it
> - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Mar 29 11:49:29 2005
|
> > - Irestarted the daemon
> > - attached strace to it
> > - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images
|
|
Re: wrong handling of attachment names, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Mar 29 16:21:32 2005
|
> > - Irestarted the daemon
> > - attached strace to it
> > - requested the list for a testin logbook, few entries some quite big images
|
|
Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 10:31:01 2005
|
Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
as soon as it is accessed.
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 10:39:00 2005
|
> Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> as soon as it is accessed.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:00:59 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 11:01:06 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 11:28:13 2005
|
> > Using 2.5.8, if I set "Protect Selection page" to 1, then elogd seg faults
> > as soon as it is accessed.
>
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 11:47:58 2005
|
> Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stephen A. Wood on Thu Mar 24 12:09:55 2005
|
> > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> > with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Alex H on Fri Mar 25 12:44:49 2005
|
> > > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> > > with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> > > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Re: Crash with Protect Selection page = 1, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Mar 25 18:25:59 2005
|
> > > > Logins work OK if the username/password is valid. However, if I try to login
> > > > with invalid authentication, the server crashes. If I turn off the protect
> > > > selection page, then invalid authentication does not crash elogd.
|
|
Database type logbook entry creation, posted by David Egolf on Thu Mar 24 20:36:50 2005
|
I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that
shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those
pounds to dollars. pounds x $4.00 = cost I was wondering if this was
|
|
Re: Database type logbook entry creation, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 21:17:28 2005
|
> I would like to create a paper waste logbook. I need to have a column that
> shows a weight in pounds and another column with a calculation from those
> pounds to dollars. pounds x $4.00 = cost I was wondering if this was
|
|
HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Feb 7 18:55:02 2005
|
as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign. |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 20:13:28 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
<br>
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 11:23:44 2005
|
> > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> <br>
> > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 12:44:29 2005
|
> > > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> > <br>
> > > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Feb 24 12:45:02 2005
|
> > > as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> > <br>
> > > it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Mar 2 17:31:33 2005
|
> > I tried to substitute avery occurrence of hard coded "&" with "&" but it does
> > not do the job at all ... infact the first time the HTML code is ok, but
> > following a link let the browser to automatically decode html entities .. and
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 13:11:30 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
<br>
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.<p>
|
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:40:55 2005
|
| I added ths missing tags. The validator at least does not complain any more. |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 13:21:28 2005
|
> as this url shows http://www.htmlhelp.com/tools/validator/problems.html#amp
> it should be used an HTML entity instead of the ampersand sign.
Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
here is an example
of your online Demo elog:
http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920 |
|
Re: HTML 4.1 transitional validation fails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Mar 24 13:59:06 2005
|
> Stefan, the validation still fails on the ampersand ...
> here is an example of your online Demo elog:
> http://validator.w3.org/check?verbose=1&uri=http%3A//midas.psi.ch/elogs/Forum/920
|
|
New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Recai Oktas on Wed Mar 23 05:56:35 2005
|
Hi to all,
I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Mar 23 11:19:51 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Recai Oktas on Wed Mar 23 16:44:32 2005
|
> It seems to work nice to me.
> Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:26:46 2005
|
> > It seems to work nice to me.
> > Just another suggestion: I think it would be better to insert a commented out
> > example for all allowed parameters in the distributed /etc/default/elog
|
|
Re: New Debian package (2.5.8+r1592) -- needs testing, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Mar 24 12:30:07 2005
|
> Hi to all,
>
> I've prepared a new Debian package. This version will probably be the one
|