How to import previous emails to elog ?, posted by Anand Sengupta on Fri Feb 18 08:43:42 2005
|
Hi
|
Re: How to import previous emails to elog ?, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 18 08:47:20 2005
|
| Have a look at http://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Contributions/10 |
images attached shown as inline , posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Feb 7 13:14:41 2005
|
I'm configuring this great application in order to replace the previous
elogbook my community is using (in the accelerator's world).
|
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 13:34:17 2005
|
> One of the main and mandatory feature they cannot renunce is the possibility
> of displaying every attached image just inline, without having to click over
> the file name or to enter the entry view (in which the attachment can
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Feb 7 14:06:48 2005
|
> > One of the main and mandatory feature they cannot renunce is the possibility
> > of displaying every attached image just inline, without having to click over
> > the file name or to enter the entry view (in which the attachment can
|
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 14:23:37 2005
|
> yes I know, but it could be a "placebo" :-P .. we are using the elog in a lan so it
> could be a good temporary solution ...
>
|
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Feb 7 15:59:04 2005
|
> > yes I know, but it could be a "placebo" :-P .. we are using the elog in a lan so it
> > could be a good temporary solution ...
> >
|
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 21:07:58 2005
|
> uhm ok .. can I expect to get a release with this feature in the near future ?
I checked how I would do that and did not find a good solution. If I put a
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 12:39:53 2005
|
> > uhm ok .. can I expect to get a release with this feature in the near future ?
>
> I checked how I would do that and did not find a good solution. If I put a
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:08:32 2005 
|
> the following should do the job:
>
> <div style="width: 200px">
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Feb 16 08:58:47 2005
|
> > the following should do the job:
> >
> > <div style="width: 200px">
|
|
Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 16 09:02:09 2005
|
As I wrote you by mail, I implemented your idea in the following way. As you
say, it's only working on Gecko based systems. I did not implement additional
configuration parameters, but made it through the CSS file:
|
[patch] Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 19:04:25 2005
|
> > uhm ok .. can I expect to get a release with this feature in the near future ?
>
> I checked how I would do that and did not find a good solution. If I put a
|
|
[patch] Re: images attached shown as inline , posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:48:51 2005
|
Are you sure that this does not stretch small images? Please see elog:931
> two new elog.conf parameters are defined:
|
|
[patch]: fixed wrong extention check, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 17:40:54 2005
|
current version uses strstr() to check if the file has the expected ascii
text extension ... this is buggy becouse this way a file named
|
|
Re: [patch]: fixed wrong extention check, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:45:39 2005
|
> current version uses strstr() to check if the file has the expected ascii
> text extension ... this is buggy becouse this way a file named
> ".txt_hidden_file" or "foo.config.dat" are both seen as .txt files.
|
|
Re: [patch]: fixed wrong extention check, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Feb 16 08:48:52 2005
|
> > current version uses strstr() to check if the file has the expected ascii
> > text extension ... this is buggy becouse this way a file named
> > ".txt_hidden_file" or "foo.config.dat" are both seen as .txt files.
|
|
preselected values and conditional options, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Mon Feb 7 13:28:18 2005
|
here is a piece of my current config:
;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
|
|
Re: preselected values and conditional options, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Tue Feb 8 13:13:22 2005
|
up :-) |
|
Re: preselected values and conditional options, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 17:06:44 2005
|
> ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
> Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
> Required Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
|
Re: preselected values and conditional options, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Wed Feb 16 08:45:54 2005
|
> > ;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;
> > Attributes = Author, Type, Category, Subject
> > Required Attributes = Author, Type, Subject
|
|
Configuration problems, posted by Erich Beyrent on Mon Feb 14 17:10:00 2005
|
I am trying to run eLog under Apache 2 on my FreeBSD 5.3 server. I started
the daemon with "elogd -n <my hostname> -p 8080" and when I connect to my
server on that port, I get a 500 server configuration error. The Apache log
|
|
Re: Configuration problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 14 19:03:31 2005
|
> I am trying to run eLog under Apache 2 on my FreeBSD 5.3 server. I started
> the daemon with "elogd -n <my hostname> -p 8080" and when I connect to my
> server on that port, I get a 500 server configuration error. The Apache log
|
|
Re: Configuration problems, posted by Erich Beyrent on Mon Feb 14 20:39:30 2005
|
> > I am trying to run eLog under Apache 2 on my FreeBSD 5.3 server. I started
> > the daemon with "elogd -n <my hostname> -p 8080" and when I connect to my
> > server on that port, I get a 500 server configuration error. The Apache log
|
|
Re: Configuration problems, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 14 20:43:48 2005
|
> No luck. I have the proxy definition in my httpd.conf file. I have the URL parameter
> in my elogd.cfg file.
|
|
ELOG security vulnerability fixed, IMPORTANT!!!!, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 14 12:36:30 2005
|
Dear ELOG users,
It has been brought to my attention that ELOG has a vulnerability through
|
|
Re: ELOG security vulnerability fixed, IMPORTANT!!!!, posted by Recai Oktas on Mon Feb 14 18:49:44 2005
|
Attention to Debian users;
I've prepared the fixed package and also contacted to Debian Security Team for
|
|
ELOG Command Line Utility, posted by Tim Fowler on Wed Feb 9 15:40:12 2005
|
I am trying to use the command line utility elog. Some of the attributes
that I have setup are multiple options. When I run the command line
utility to create a new message, any attribute that is setup with multiple
|
|
Re: ELOG Command Line Utility, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Feb 13 17:21:19 2005
|
> I am trying to use the command line utility elog. Some of the attributes
> that I have setup are multiple options. When I run the command line
> utility to create a new message, any attribute that is setup with multiple
|
|
Help with configuration newbie, posted by Anand Sengupta on Fri Feb 11 15:44:38 2005
|
Hi,
|
|
Re: Help with configuration newbie, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Feb 12 20:11:48 2005
|
> 1. When replying to another reply in a thread, the author_name attribute is
> not substitued (as desired). Since this is a mandatory field, we are not
> able to send the reply message. However, reply to the originial message
|
Re: Help with configuration newbie, posted by Anand Sengupta on Sat Feb 12 20:51:43 2005
|
> > 1. When replying to another reply in a thread, the author_name attribute is
> > not substitued (as desired). Since this is a mandatory field, we are not
> > able to send the reply message. However, reply to the originial message
|
|
Re: Help with configuration newbie, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sun Feb 13 16:43:05 2005
|
> For me, when I put the Category in the fixed attributes for reply, I see the
> Category but when I actually try to send the message - it says Category not
> entered. I am sure I am doing something very stupid. Please help.
|