Default Sorting Option, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Feb 27 10:09:04 2004
|
I really don't know if anybody already had this problem or i just didn't
find the solution in the documenttaion:
|
Re: Default Sorting Option, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 27 10:28:00 2004
|
This can be easily achieved with the configuration option
Start page = ?sort=<attribute>
|
Re: Default Sorting Option, posted by Ulrich Trüssel on Fri Feb 27 13:25:32 2004
|
Thank's!!! :-))
Great solution. Exactly what I need! |
-W -Wall options (using gcc), posted by Heiko Scheit on Fri Feb 13 12:25:15 2004
|
Maybe consider using the options -W -Wall when compiling elogd.
There are several warning messages. |
|
Re: -W -Wall options (using gcc), posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 13 21:52:48 2004
|
| Thanks, I did so. |
|
Re: -W -Wall options (using gcc), posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 16 16:07:34 2004
|
So I fixed all compiler generated warnigns except these:
[midas@pc2075 ~/elog]$ gcc -g -O -W -Wall -o elogd src/elogd.c
|
|
Re: -W -Wall options (using gcc), posted by Heiko Scheit on Mon Feb 16 16:40:50 2004
|
> So I fixed all compiler generated warnigns except these:
>
> [midas@pc2075 ~/elog]$ gcc -g -O -W -Wall -o elogd src/elogd.c
|
|
Re: -W -Wall options (using gcc), posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 16 16:47:55 2004
|
> Have a look at the gcc info pages:
>
> $ info gcc "invoking gcc" "warning options"
|
|
Re: -W -Wall options (using gcc), posted by Heiko Scheit on Mon Feb 16 17:18:39 2004
|
> > Have a look at the gcc info pages:
> >
> > $ info gcc "invoking gcc" "warning options"
|
elog (not elogd) submit does not work anymore, posted by Heiko Scheit on Fri Feb 13 12:21:25 2004
|
Somehow elog does not use the -s option (subdir) anymore,
resulting in a 'HTTP/1.1 404 Not Found' error.
|
|
Re: elog (not elogd) submit does not work anymore, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 13 21:59:44 2004
|
Oops! I 're-used' the '-s' flag for email suppression, so it was actually
double used. I changed the email supprssion flag to '-p', so '-s' should
work again for specifying subdirectories. |
|
Behaviour of text when using quote marks in header fields , posted by Fergus Lynch on Wed Feb 11 15:06:38 2004
|
Hi,
First off let me say what an excellent program, simple yet powerful...
|
|
Re: Behaviour of text when using "quote marks" in header fields , posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 13 21:34:57 2004
|
Like this one ^^^ ???
I'm joking! I fixed the bug and updated the elogd server. Please find the new
|
Re: Behaviour of text when using "quote marks" in header fields , posted by Fergus Lynch on Fri Feb 13 21:50:59 2004
|
> Like this one ^^^ ???
>
> I'm joking! I fixed the bug and updated the elogd server. Please find the new
|
|
segmentation fault, posted by Heiko Scheit on Fri Feb 13 12:18:19 2004
|
Around line 2240 (in loc()) in elogd.c the following is written,
which results in an infinite loop, since loc() recursively with
|
|
Re: segmentation fault, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 13 21:50:09 2004
|
This problem has been fixed recently. The new code is
/* special case: "Change %s" */
|
Javascript for Bookmark Link for one-click submission to elog, posted by Fred Hooper on Sat Jan 31 09:33:35 2004 
|
I have created a javascript to be used as a browser link that allows a one
step cut and paste from a web browser into a elog logbook.
|
|
Re: Javascript for Bookmark Link for one-click submission to elog, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 4 12:00:14 2004
|
I find this script very nice. Indeed JavaScript can be very powerful to do such
things. I added some JavaScript support to the elogd server itself. If one opens
the "New" page like
|
New major ELOG version 2.5.0 released, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 29 10:14:13 2004
|
Version 2.5.0 of ELOG has been released yesterday. The main new feature is
the automatic mirroring of logbooks between different elog servers.
|
|
Strange timezone in email sent with Postfix, posted by Joseph Giaime on Thu Jan 29 00:24:44 2004
|
Hi all,
I'm having trouble getting a sensible timezone to be attached to e-mail that
gets sent out when messages are posted. I'm using Postfix, not sendmail
(Mac
OS X Server uses this beginning with version 10.3). In this set-up,
the 'sendmail' program is a front-end for Postfix, not the real thing. I
suspect |
|
Re: Strange timezone in email sent with Postfix, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 29 09:25:45 2004
|
> Instead of something like "Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2004 14:46:16 -0600", the
> "-0600" is replaced by a large number that doesn't correspond with anything
> I can figure out. This is the sort of thing that does no real harm, but the
|