"Selection page" parameter, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Thu May 8 16:49:05 2003
|
Hi,
I have a question concerning the "Selection page" ELOG.cfg parameter.
|
Re: , posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu May 8 22:22:24 2003
|
> I have a question concerning the "Selection page" ELOG.cfg parameter.
> I was wondering if it is possible to specify a complete (absolute) URL
such
|
|
Re: , posted by Tomas Rudolf on Mon May 12 18:11:26 2003
|
> > I have a question concerning the "Selection page" ELOG.cfg parameter.
> > I was wondering if it is possible to specify a complete (absolute) URL
> such
|
|
Use Email From = $user_email, posted by Etienne Van Caillie on Mon May 12 11:20:17 2003
|
if you put
Use Email From = $user_email
|
|
Re: Use Email From = $user_email, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon May 12 16:01:38 2003
|
> if you put
>
> Use Email From = $user_email
|
A NAME=... tags around the attachments, posted by Thomas Salein on Wed May 7 15:20:46 2003
|
Hello Stefan,
it would be useful, if the web server automatically produced tags <A NAME=
|
|
Re: A NAME=... tags around the attachments, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 7 21:15:57 2003
|
> it would be useful, if the web server automatically produced tags <A NAME=
> [AttachNo3]>Anhang 3</A> around the entry of the attachment. With this one
> could easily reference in the HTML text an attachement at the end of the
|
missing '.' in emails, posted by Heiko Scheit on Wed May 7 16:04:45 2003
|
missing '.' in emails
-----------------------
|
|
Re: missing '.' in emails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 7 16:12:37 2003
|
>
> missing '.' in emails
> -----------------------
|
|
Re: missing '.' in emails, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 7 21:09:32 2003
|
> I checked my mail program and
> found out that it converts a single dot into two dots at the beginning
> of the line. I have to implement this in elgod.c.
|
"Number Attachments =" not being read after upgrade, posted by Kevin Ellwood on Wed May 7 16:54:26 2003
|
Hello
I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
|
|
Re: , posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 7 16:58:34 2003
|
> I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
> Attachments =" is not being read. Looking at the changelog, I found that
> "Number Attachments" has been removed in favor of "enable attachments". I
|
|
Re: , posted by Kevin Ellwood on Wed May 7 17:27:51 2003
|
> > I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
> > Attachments =" is not being read. Looking at the changelog, I found that
> > "Number Attachments" has been removed in favor of "enable attachments". I
|
CVS URL, posted by nickc1 on Tue May 6 10:53:33 2003
|
Can anyone tell me the URL for the CVS download section
the link has gone from one of the main screens
|
|
Re: CVS URL, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 6 11:34:22 2003
|
> Can anyone tell me the URL for the CVS download section
>
> the link has gone from one of the main screens
|
ELOG Skins Showcase, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Sat May 3 11:08:11 2003
|
Hello everybody.
I am sure that some of you (just like me) experimented already with themes
|
Re: ELOG Skins Showcase, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat May 3 15:06:16 2003
|
> Let's share some inspiration. I'll post mine as soon as finished the re-
> look.
|
|
User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 00:34:26 2003
|
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone had a solution for my problem.
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri May 2 08:45:38 2003
|
> We would like to give access to selected users to only their Group. So that
> for instance Users1 cannot access the books of group Users3. I was
> wondering if there is any notion of "User profile" or security per logbook
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Robert Keeney on Fri May 2 15:58:23 2003
|
I have managed to get this to work (so far).
What I do is use a separate password file and directory for each log.
|
|
Re: User Profile - Access to logbook group, posted by Tomas Rudolf on Fri May 2 18:10:36 2003
|
Robert, this is exactly what we managed to do as well. And it works fine.
The only issue is that the users from one group can "SEE" the book names
available to other groups.
|