Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 412 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  Draft   Fri Nov 6 15:45:33 2015 Reply Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie
<p>Hi Andreas, I opted for installing FCKeditor rather than Elog, since the debian package, even if outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit which is very handy for managing the daemon. I found FCKeditor 2.6.11 on SorceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor almost made his parent disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and now when I edit a page I can use the WYSIWYG editor. There are just two minor issues: the first is that no drop area for the attachments is shown (I had it on my old Debian 6 server) and that he toolbar of the editor has an ugly &quot;Windows 95&quot; look. This is a screenshot:</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Andreas Luedeke wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<div>Hi Nicola,</div>

<div>this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.</div>

<div>But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor&quot;.</div>

<div>Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.</div>

<div>Cheers, Andreas</div>

<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Nicola wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<p>I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my <a href="http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&amp;t=125320">help request</a> on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with &quot;systemctl start elog&quot; I get this suspect message in the journal: &quot;FCKedit NOT detected&quot;. Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><code>root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor<br />
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25&nbsp; 2014 fckeditor -&gt; ../../fckeditor<br />
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor<br />
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory</code></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
  68181   Fri Nov 6 15:52:30 2015 Reply Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie

Hi Andreas, I opted for the first solution since the Debian package, although outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit for managing the daemon which is very handy. I downloaded FCKeditor 2.6.11 from SourceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor made its parent almost disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and not the WYSIWYG editor works. I have just a couple of minor issues: there is no attachment drop area (I had it in my old Debian 6 server) and the editor toolbar has an ugly "Windows 95" look; see the attached image. I can live with these problems but if the can be easily fixed then obviously I would do that, can you give me any hint? Thank you very much.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote:

I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:

root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25  2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory

Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks

 

 

Attachment 1: elog-debian8.jpeg
elog-debian8.jpeg
  68184   Mon Nov 9 12:15:16 2015 Reply Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie

Hi Andreas, understood. I found a 3.1.0 package for Debian unstable but it won't install on Jessie since it depends on a newer version of openssl, and it seems to not have a systemd unit (not sure about that, though). I can live with my old version now that the WYSIWYG editor works, and in the meantime I'll keep my eyes open for a brave soul who would eventually package a newer elog version for Jessie.

Thanks again for the support.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
Hi Nicola,
as Stefan pointed out: the debian package that you are using is from an outdated ELOG version and not supported anymore. I can't help you with that.
Is somebody out there that created a 3.1.x version debian package?
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote:

Hi Andreas, I opted for the first solution since the Debian package, although outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit for managing the daemon which is very handy. I downloaded FCKeditor 2.6.11 from SourceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor made its parent almost disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and not the WYSIWYG editor works. I have just a couple of minor issues: there is no attachment drop area (I had it in my old Debian 6 server) and the editor toolbar has an ugly "Windows 95" look; see the attached image. I can live with these problems but if the can be easily fixed then obviously I would do that, can you give me any hint? Thank you very much.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote:

I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:

root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25  2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory

Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks

 

 

 

 

  69722   Mon Jan 22 08:22:33 2024 Question Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinuxV3.1.3-7933898How to not expose elog port when running under a reverse proxy

I am running elog under Apache as explained in the administrator's guide. Everything works fine, butmy IT service complains about the elog port being publicly exposed, so I have to fix this. As far as I understand when running under a reverse proxy there's no need for the port to be publiuclyexposed, but I cannot find how to configure the elog server to expose it only locally

  246   Thu Mar 13 17:30:16 2003 Entry nicknick@nick.comBug report  Problems with 2.3.2
Ive just installed the RPM of Elog 2.3.2 and ive found a bug relating to 
port bindings, basically im running elog bound to port 81 and when i 
install the new RPM it refuses to bind to this port, i tried port 8080 and 
that worked fine

Any ideas ?
  258   Mon Mar 31 12:44:33 2003 Reply nicknick@nick.comInfo  Re: Elog and SSL
Im not running anything on port 443, one thing I did notice is that when 
stunnel is run and setup, I can run a netstat and nothing is bound to those 
ports, if I do a ps -ef | grep stunnel nothing is running, yet it accepts the 
command initially ?


CONFUSED ????

> > I was wondering if you can help me understand the concept and if i am 
doing 
> > something wrong with securing Elog via SSL
> > 
> > Basically im running elog on a redhat 8 box with stunnel already 
installed 
> > as part of OpenSSL, on the server i ran the command specified in the 
> > instructions
> > 
> > stunnel -d 443 -r 172.16.24.108:81
> > 
> > This command runs on the server, but when I access https://172.16.24.108/ 
i 
> > get a page cannot be displayed, ive also put the URL = 
> > https://172.16.24.108 entry in the elogd.cfg file
> > 
> > HELP!!!!!!!
> 
> Can you access your server locally under http://172.16.24.108:81 ??? If 
not, 
> then you maybe specified the wrong port, so check elogd.cfg and the "-p" 
flag 
> when starting elogd. If you can access it, and cannot access it under 
> https://, then something must be wrong with your stunnel configuration. 
Maybe 
> you run already a secure server under port 443? User "netstat -a" to check 
> that.
  261   Wed Apr 2 16:36:18 2003 Entry nicknick@nick.comInfo  Logbook Title bar
Is there a way to change the title entry for individual log books, and 
forms ive completely rebranded our system but ut stil says ELOG ENTRIES on 
the summary screen
  263   Thu Apr 3 09:40:45 2003 Reply nicknick@nick.comInfo  Re: Logbook Title bar
> > Is there a way to change the title entry for individual log books, and 
> > forms ive completely rebranded our system but ut stil says ELOG ENTRIES 
on 
> > the summary screen
> 
> I changed the default title recently to "ELOG - <logbook>" where <logbook> 
> is the name of the current logbook. For the individual messages, the 
> title "ELOG" can be changed with the elogd.cfg option "Page title". This 
> title can even contain attributes from the logook entry like:
> 
> Page title = ELOG - $subject
> 
> where $subject gets replaced by the subject of the logbook entry.

I have those attributes already working for example

[global]
Page title = Customer Relational Management System < this sets the selection 
page ok

[Config DB]
Page Title = ABC123 - $Customer Name < this sets the individual log book 
entries title

I need something to set the title of the page when on the summary page for 
the logbook, as it just says ELOG - Config DB (this isnt set anywhere)
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6