Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 412 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
New entries since:Thu Jan 1 01:00:00 1970
ID Date Icon Author Author Emaildown Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  Draft   Fri Nov 6 15:45:33 2015 Reply Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie
<p>Hi Andreas, I opted for installing FCKeditor rather than Elog, since the debian package, even if outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit which is very handy for managing the daemon. I found FCKeditor 2.6.11 on SorceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor almost made his parent disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and now when I edit a page I can use the WYSIWYG editor. There are just two minor issues: the first is that no drop area for the attachments is shown (I had it on my old Debian 6 server) and that he toolbar of the editor has an ugly &quot;Windows 95&quot; look. This is a screenshot:</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<p>&nbsp;</p>

<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Andreas Luedeke wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<div>Hi Nicola,</div>

<div>this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.</div>

<div>But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location &quot;/usr/share/fckeditor&quot;.</div>

<div>Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.</div>

<div>Cheers, Andreas</div>

<table align="center" cellspacing="1" style="border:1px solid #486090; width:98%">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#486090">Nicola wrote:</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="background-color:#FFFFB0">
<p>I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my <a href="http://forums.debian.net/viewtopic.php?f=5&amp;t=125320">help request</a> on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with &quot;systemctl start elog&quot; I get this suspect message in the journal: &quot;FCKedit NOT detected&quot;. Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:</p>

<blockquote>
<p><code>root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor<br />
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25&nbsp; 2014 fckeditor -&gt; ../../fckeditor<br />
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor<br />
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory</code></p>
</blockquote>

<p>Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>

<p>&nbsp;</p>
  68181   Fri Nov 6 15:52:30 2015 Reply Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie

Hi Andreas, I opted for the first solution since the Debian package, although outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit for managing the daemon which is very handy. I downloaded FCKeditor 2.6.11 from SourceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor made its parent almost disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and not the WYSIWYG editor works. I have just a couple of minor issues: there is no attachment drop area (I had it in my old Debian 6 server) and the editor toolbar has an ugly "Windows 95" look; see the attached image. I can live with these problems but if the can be easily fixed then obviously I would do that, can you give me any hint? Thank you very much.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote:

I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:

root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25  2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory

Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks

 

 

Attachment 1: elog-debian8.jpeg
elog-debian8.jpeg
  68184   Mon Nov 9 12:15:16 2015 Reply Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinux2.9.2Re: WYSIWYG editor for Elog not working in Debian Jessie

Hi Andreas, understood. I found a 3.1.0 package for Debian unstable but it won't install on Jessie since it depends on a newer version of openssl, and it seems to not have a systemd unit (not sure about that, though). I can live with my old version now that the WYSIWYG editor works, and in the meantime I'll keep my eyes open for a brave soul who would eventually package a newer elog version for Jessie.

Thanks again for the support.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
Hi Nicola,
as Stefan pointed out: the debian package that you are using is from an outdated ELOG version and not supported anymore. I can't help you with that.
Is somebody out there that created a 3.1.x version debian package?
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote:

Hi Andreas, I opted for the first solution since the Debian package, although outdated and broken, has some goodies like a systemd unit for managing the daemon which is very handy. I downloaded FCKeditor 2.6.11 from SourceForge (after a long search, seems that CKeditor made its parent almost disappear from the web), unpacked it in the proper folder and not the WYSIWYG editor works. I have just a couple of minor issues: there is no attachment drop area (I had it in my old Debian 6 server) and the editor toolbar has an ugly "Windows 95" look; see the attached image. I can live with these problems but if the can be easily fixed then obviously I would do that, can you give me any hint? Thank you very much.

Andreas Luedeke wrote:
Hi Nicola,
this appears to be a particular problem of the specific (outdated) ELOG debian package.
But you could just download the FCKeditor directly and install it to the proposed location "/usr/share/fckeditor".
Or you download ELOG 3.1.1 and give it a try to install it with the makefile.
Cheers, Andreas
Nicola wrote:

I suspect that this might be a Debian packaging issue; however no one replied to my help request on the Debian forums so I try posting the question also here. I insatlled Elog on my Debian Jessie machine, I can open it with a browser but when entering a new post just a simple plain text editing box is shown instead of the WYSIWYG editor, and no drag and drop area for attachments is shown. When I start the elog service with "systemctl start elog" I get this suspect message in the journal: "FCKedit NOT detected". Indeed, I see that the elog installation creates a symlink which I guess is supposed to point to the fckeditor installation, which nevertheless is missing:

root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll fckeditor
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 15 Oct 25  2014 fckeditor -> ../../fckeditor
root@static-3-080:/usr/share/elog/scripts# ll ../../fckeditor
ls: cannot access ../../fckeditor: No such file or directory

Is this a Deban misconfiguration or a bug in Elog? thanks

 

 

 

 

  69722   Mon Jan 22 08:22:33 2024 Question Nicolanicolamori@aol.comQuestionLinuxV3.1.3-7933898How to not expose elog port when running under a reverse proxy

I am running elog under Apache as explained in the administrator's guide. Everything works fine, butmy IT service complains about the elog port being publicly exposed, so I have to fix this. As far as I understand when running under a reverse proxy there's no need for the port to be publiuclyexposed, but I cannot find how to configure the elog server to expose it only locally

  246   Thu Mar 13 17:30:16 2003 Entry nicknick@nick.comBug report  Problems with 2.3.2
Ive just installed the RPM of Elog 2.3.2 and ive found a bug relating to 
port bindings, basically im running elog bound to port 81 and when i 
install the new RPM it refuses to bind to this port, i tried port 8080 and 
that worked fine

Any ideas ?
  258   Mon Mar 31 12:44:33 2003 Reply nicknick@nick.comInfo  Re: Elog and SSL
Im not running anything on port 443, one thing I did notice is that when 
stunnel is run and setup, I can run a netstat and nothing is bound to those 
ports, if I do a ps -ef | grep stunnel nothing is running, yet it accepts the 
command initially ?


CONFUSED ????

> > I was wondering if you can help me understand the concept and if i am 
doing 
> > something wrong with securing Elog via SSL
> > 
> > Basically im running elog on a redhat 8 box with stunnel already 
installed 
> > as part of OpenSSL, on the server i ran the command specified in the 
> > instructions
> > 
> > stunnel -d 443 -r 172.16.24.108:81
> > 
> > This command runs on the server, but when I access https://172.16.24.108/ 
i 
> > get a page cannot be displayed, ive also put the URL = 
> > https://172.16.24.108 entry in the elogd.cfg file
> > 
> > HELP!!!!!!!
> 
> Can you access your server locally under http://172.16.24.108:81 ??? If 
not, 
> then you maybe specified the wrong port, so check elogd.cfg and the "-p" 
flag 
> when starting elogd. If you can access it, and cannot access it under 
> https://, then something must be wrong with your stunnel configuration. 
Maybe 
> you run already a secure server under port 443? User "netstat -a" to check 
> that.
  261   Wed Apr 2 16:36:18 2003 Entry nicknick@nick.comInfo  Logbook Title bar
Is there a way to change the title entry for individual log books, and 
forms ive completely rebranded our system but ut stil says ELOG ENTRIES on 
the summary screen
  263   Thu Apr 3 09:40:45 2003 Reply nicknick@nick.comInfo  Re: Logbook Title bar
> > Is there a way to change the title entry for individual log books, and 
> > forms ive completely rebranded our system but ut stil says ELOG ENTRIES 
on 
> > the summary screen
> 
> I changed the default title recently to "ELOG - <logbook>" where <logbook> 
> is the name of the current logbook. For the individual messages, the 
> title "ELOG" can be changed with the elogd.cfg option "Page title". This 
> title can even contain attributes from the logook entry like:
> 
> Page title = ELOG - $subject
> 
> where $subject gets replaced by the subject of the logbook entry.

I have those attributes already working for example

[global]
Page title = Customer Relational Management System < this sets the selection 
page ok

[Config DB]
Page Title = ABC123 - $Customer Name < this sets the individual log book 
entries title

I need something to set the title of the page when on the summary page for 
the logbook, as it just says ELOG - Config DB (this isnt set anywhere)
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6