Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 550 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
IDdown Date Icon Author Author Email Category OS ELOG Version Subject
  2118   Wed Jan 17 13:27:46 2007 Reply deletoillexavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.frQuestionLinux | Windows2.6.3-1762Re: Two different attributes with the same list

Stefan Ritt wrote:

deletoille wrote:
In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”.
“Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list.

The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”.

So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger.


Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal?


I don't understand your problem. The picture you attached, was this some ELOG output (it looks very different than the usual one...)? Do mean you have two attributes with the same "Options <attribute> = ...,..,.." list? With "multiple conditions" you mean that you do a search in ELOG with a condition one one attribute, but in the filter list both attributes having the same option list are shown. Is this correct? What section of the configuration file are you talking about?

Best regards

Stefan


I'm soory, i'm very poor in english.

Here is a very small part of my program:

{AE&Anneau&Panne} Moptions Défaut = Flowmeter or Door meter, Communication, Earth, IAC, Driver, Temp. Ambiant, Phase, Cooling Water, Overvoltage, OverCurrent, Sample Card, Ripple, EEPROM, Autres
{AE&Anneau&Gr} Moptions Equipement incriminé = Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4, Q5, Q6, Q7, Q8, Q9, Q10, QT, S1, S2, S3, S4, S5, S6, S7, S8, S9, S10, Alim correcteurs H., Alim correcteurs V., alim. Dipole, Alim Q., Alim S.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C01} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C02} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C03} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C04} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C05} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C06} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C07} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT ,S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C08} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C09} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C10} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH ,S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C11} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C12} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C13} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C14} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.2-CH, S8.2-QT, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.1-QT, S10.2-CH, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C15} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q6.1, Q7.1, Q8.1, Q9.1, Q10.1, QB, Q6.2, Q7.2, Q8.2, Q9.2, Q10.2, S7.1-CV, S7.2-CV, S8.1-CH, S8.1-QT, S8.2-CH, S9.1-CV, S9.2-CV, S10.1-CH, S10.2-CH, S10.2-QT, COR.
{AE&Anneau&Se&C16} Moptions Equipement incriminé = QA, Q1, Q2, Q3, Q4.1, Q5.1, QB, Q4.2, Q5.2, Q6, Q7, Q8, S1-CH, S1-QT, S2-CV, S4-CH, S4-CV, S4-QT, S5-CV, S6-CH, COR.

Do I have to program the list for "Equipement Impacté" or is there a simple command to say that "Equipement incrimé" and "equipement inpacté" have the same list?

Thanks in advance
Xavier Deletoille
  2117   Wed Jan 17 12:55:07 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestion  Re: How many topgroups can be defined?

Exaos Lee wrote:
I defined 6 top groups in my cfg file as the attachment.
But ... It doesn't work as I wanted.
The 4th and 5th groups need login. But when I clicked the 4th or 5th group, the login isn't needed.
And the 4th and 5th password files are not generated automatically.


When changing groups and to groups, one can sometimes get fooled by old cookies. Delete all your cookies and try again. You can also install the "Tamper Data" extension for Firefox (https://addons.mozilla.org/firefox/966/) which shows you which cookies are sent to your ELOG server. This should reveal the problem.
  2116   Wed Jan 17 12:49:25 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionLinux | Windows2.6.3-1762Re: Two different attributes with the same list

deletoille wrote:
In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”.
“Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list.

The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”.

So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger.


Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal?


I don't understand your problem. The picture you attached, was this some ELOG output (it looks very different than the usual one...)? Do mean you have two attributes with the same "Options <attribute> = ...,..,.." list? With "multiple conditions" you mean that you do a search in ELOG with a condition one one attribute, but in the filter list both attributes having the same option list are shown. Is this correct? What section of the configuration file are you talking about?

Best regards

Stefan
  2115   Wed Jan 17 09:20:17 2007 Angy deletoillexavier.deletoille@synchrotron-soleil.frQuestionLinux | Windows2.6.3-1762Two different attributes with the same list
In this picture of my project, All the attributes included in the red circle are the same except the names of the attribute “Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté”.
“Equipement Incriminé” and “Equipement impacté” have the same list.

The displayed list for the both attributes is the multiple conditions result coming from the choice of “groupe incriminé or impacté, sous ensemble, selection, and localisation”.

So if I have to program the list twice, it will be twice bigger.


Do I need to program the same list twice for the two attributes or is there a simple command to say that the two precedent attributes are equal?

Thanks in advance

Xavier Deletoille
Attachment 1: fiche_panne2.JPG
fiche_panne2.JPG
  2114   Tue Jan 16 23:01:30 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chBug reportWindows2.6.3-1776Re: ELOG Crash by many email address

An Thai wrote:
Hello,

when I try to set above 112 email addresses in
"Email All = ..."
the Elog service will crash with the error ntdll.dll or memory addresses x0000000.
This problem does not happen when I reduce the number of email addresses.

Have you had the same problem?


I fixed that crash in the current version, but there is actually a limit of 100 email addresses. So anyhow you won't get the 12 ones above 100. I will try to increase that limit in the next version of elog.
  2113   Tue Jan 16 21:13:42 2007 Reply Stefan Rittstefan.ritt@psi.chQuestionAllELOG V2.6.Re: Addition of a Print CSS

Ian MacDonald wrote:
Is there any way to change the the embeded style sheet reference to allow a seperate style sheet for printing ?

Default config:-
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css">

Would like to configure to :-

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css media="screen">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="print.css" media="print">

Thanks


I implemented your suggestion. You can use now
CSS = default.css&screen, print.css&print

The new code is in SVN revision 1782 and will be contained in the next release.
  2112   Mon Jan 15 09:56:09 2007 Question Ian MacDonaldelog@irm.thamespower.comQuestionAllELOG V2.6.Addition of a Print CSS
Is there any way to change the the embeded style sheet reference to allow a seperate style sheet for printing ?

Default config:-
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css">

Would like to configure to :-

<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="default.css media="screen">
<link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="print.css" media="print">

Thanks
  2111   Sat Jan 13 17:47:45 2007 Smile Exaos LeeExaos.Lee@gmail.comRequestAll Group definition under top group
Hi, I think, if we can put the "Group xxx = xxx" under some "global xxxx" sections, the configure file will be more clean. Don't you think so? In fact, if the "Group XXX" sections are put under "global XXX" section, the "Top Group XXX" can be ignored. I also found that some options (e.g. "Logbook dir =") under "global" don't work under "global XXX".
Maybe the configure file can be defined more flexible, such as this way:
[global]
Port = 8080
Top configuration = yes

[global Group1]
Group config = group1.cfg

[global Group2]
Group config = group2.cfg
The "group1.cfg" looks like this:
[global]
Top configuration = no
Password file = group1.pwd
Group Linux PCs = Red Hat, Debian, Gentoo
Group Windows PCs = 98, ME, XP, Vista
Group Vista = Home, Pro, Media Center

[Red Hat]
...
ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6