ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66246
|
Wed Mar 11 11:28:27 2009 |
| Dominique Bolla | dominique.bolla@synchrotron-soleil.fr | Bug report | Linux | V2.7.5-214 | Elogd crash |
Hello,
Please could you help me.
We have 2 elog servers synchronized every minute via Elog mirroring function.
2 or 3 times a week, the slave crashes and we have to restart Elogd. I have found in /var/log/messages the same message every time elogd crash :
xmalloc: not enough memory
Thanks.
Dominique Bolla. |
66984
|
Fri Jan 14 00:07:01 2011 |
| JacekK | doctor99@poczta.onet.pl | Bug report | All | 2.8.0 | New entries are not visible from other logbooks based on the same logbook dir through Subdir |
Hi,
I have two logbooks based on the same data directory through "Subdir" option and when I add new
entry in one logbook, then that entry is not visible in other logbook.
I suppose it is a bug in el_submit function, where I think the new message should be added to
message index of every logbook based on the same data directory as the one, where the message was physically
created.
There is a piece of code, which I think should do this automatically
/* if other logbook has same index, update pointers */
but it seems the other logbooks does not have the same index.
I'm new to elog and the sources are also new to me, so my guess to the ground of the problem may be wrong.
Let me know is this bug possible to fix in near future.
Best regards,
Jacek |
66854
|
Thu Jul 22 00:31:54 2010 |
| David McKee | dmckee@phys.ksu.edu | Question | All | 2.7 | What *exactly* do "clone" and "mirror" do? |
We have been hosting logbook far (geographically and in internet hops) from our experimental site. Recently we have (finally!) gotten reliable on-site internet, and would like to host the log book on-site.
I have a suspicion that some combination of the -C, -m, and -M flags will allow me to migrate the logbook automagically and with a minimum risk of trouble from concurrent operation on the logbook, and to maintain the existing version as a mirror of the new official on-site version. But documentation is not being very helpful. Can someone say a few more words about what these options do?
I've been experimenting as I compose this and have a suggestion for language that might be useful somewhere in the documentation:
In this context "to clone" means to copy the configuration file and all data files associated with a log book so that I can host an identical logbook on a new host (that is this is the command to migrate a logbook). After cloning the two installation are identical, but no effort is made to keep them so: if you continue to run both copies post made to one will not be reflected in the other.
Is this correct?
I'm still not clear on what the -m and -M options do. |
69249
|
Sun Oct 25 06:26:49 2020 |
| Daniel Kohl | dkol@yaani.com | Question | Linux | Windows | Mac OSX | All | Other | 3.1.4 | MEG style elog configuration |
Hello,
I'm new to elog software and I could not find a solution to my configuration issue. I would like to setup a configuration file similar to MEG experiment's elog.
https://elog.psi.ch/elogs/meg/
I'm interested in creating similar to the structure: "General", "Collaboratoin", "Sub-groups (with sub-sub groups "Software", "Hardware" etc). I cannot tell if this was created by using Top Group feature.
Can someone explain how this design structure can be achieved?
Thanks,
Daniel |
69407
|
Mon Nov 1 12:52:23 2021 |
| David Stops | djs@star.sr.bham.ac.uk | Question | Linux | elog-3.1.4-2 | results of security scan |
Recently central IT scanned our elog server and reported the following "vulnerabilities"
- 42873 (1) - SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported (SWEET32)
- 51192 (1) - SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
- 65821 (1) - SSL RC4 Cipher Suites Supported (Bar Mitzvah)
- 85582 (1) - Web Application Potentially Vulnerable to Clickjacking
Is there any easy way of preventing these
Thanks and Best Wishes
David |
69409
|
Thu Nov 4 13:48:00 2021 |
| David Stops | djs@star.sr.bham.ac.uk | Question | Linux | elog-3.1.4-2 | Re: results of security scan |
Thanks, I'll try that and see what happens
David
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
The elgod.c progarm itself is rather weak in SSL, since I just don't have time to catch up with the latest SSL enhancements. The safest you can do is to put an industry-strenth web server like Apache in front of elogd and let that server handle the SSL layer.
Stefan
David Stops wrote: |
Recently central IT scanned our elog server and reported the following "vulnerabilities"
- 42873 (1) - SSL Medium Strength Cipher Suites Supported (SWEET32)
- 51192 (1) - SSL Certificate Cannot Be Trusted
- 65821 (1) - SSL RC4 Cipher Suites Supported (Bar Mitzvah)
- 85582 (1) - Web Application Potentially Vulnerable to Clickjacking
Is there any easy way of preventing these
Thanks and Best Wishes
David
|
|
|
1617
|
Mon Jan 23 10:30:51 2006 |
| djek | djek@xs4all.nl | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1 | redirect errors via apache2 |
Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
Redirect permanent /elog http://elog.oursite.com/elog/
ProxyPass /elog/ http://elog.oursite.com:8080/
When visiting the url, this results in:
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
The proxy server could not handle the request GET /elog/myelog/.
After testing we found that ELOG V2.6.0-beta2 works just fine.
2.6.0 stable crashes after visiting a redirected url.
Running on debian sarge |
1619
|
Mon Jan 23 11:18:48 2006 |
| djek | djek@xs4all.nl | Bug report | Linux | 2.6.1 | Re: redirect errors via apache2 |
> > Since elog 2.6.0 we cannot redirect our elog via apache2.
> >
> > in apache2.conf we have (had for a long time):
> > Redirect permanent /elog http://elog.oursite.com/elog/
> > ProxyPass /elog/ http://elog.oursite.com:8080/
> >
> > When visiting the url, this results in:
> > The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server.
> > The proxy server could not handle the request GET /elog/myelog/.
> >
> > After testing we found that ELOG V2.6.0-beta2 works just fine.
> > 2.6.0 stable crashes after visiting a redirected url.
> >
> > Running on debian sarge
>
> Have you tried 2.6.1. I released it just recently, so I don't know when it will be available for Debian.
No it doesn't work with 2.6.1. I hoped it would be fixed, but I should have reported it sooner.
I compiled 2.6.1 myself.
The original version was a debian package, after that, we compile elog ourselves and copy elogd manually over the old
version. Just to stay up-to-date.
> Have you checked that your "URL = xxx" statement in the config file is correct? I see above "myelog", while the
proxy passes requests to "elog".
I changed our urls, just to be safe.
myelog is a 'sublogbook', like forum here. http://elog.oursite.com/elog/myelog
We are running V2.6.0-beta2 and it runs fine, without any alterations to our config files.
All previous versions runned fine too.
update:
After further testing on a different server, it seems to be an issue with the proxy and the proxy_http modules in sarge.
after loading and unloading proxy_http this is the error:
The proxy server received an invalid response from an upstream server. |