Re: SVN1714 will not run in 'daemon" mode on Solaris8, posted by Steve Jones on Fri Sep 22 22:12:18 2006 
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]On Solaris, SVN1714 will not go into daemon mode. Running the compiled version under TRUSS (which provides a
dump of every system call) and shows precisely where elog is failing. I have attached two TRUSS outputs: one where it errors out and the other where it
runs but "interactively". Both runs are as root, simply one with and one without the "-D"[/quote]
|
|
Re: SVN1723 (was SVN1714) will not run in 'daemon" mode on Solaris8, posted by Steve Jones on Tue Oct 10 23:29:53 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]On Solaris, SVN1714 will not go into daemon mode. Running the compiled version under TRUSS
(which provides a dump of every system call) and shows precisely where elog is failing. I have attached two TRUSS outputs: one where it errors out and
the other where it runs but "interactively". Both runs are as root, simply one with and one without the "-D"[/quote]
|
|
Re: SVN1723 (was SVN1714) will not run in 'daemon" mode on Solaris8, posted by Steve Jones on Wed Oct 11 00:19:05 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Steve Jones"][quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Steve Jones"]On Solaris, SVN1714 will not go into daemon mode. Running the compiled
version under TRUSS (which provides a dump of every system call) and shows precisely where elog is failing. I have attached two TRUSS outputs: one where
it errors out and the other where it runs but "interactively". Both runs are as root, simply one with and one without the "-D"[/quote]
|
|
Re: SVN1723 (was SVN1714) will not run in 'daemon" mode on Solaris8, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 11 08:18:14 2006
|
[quote="Steve Jones"]There are also strange system calls that differ, and I thought it might be due to the setuid(60001) -nobody- but the the non-daemn
mode also sets to nobody and works fine.[/QUOTE]
|
Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box, posted by Gregory M. Caughey on Wed Oct 11 11:37:03 2006
|
Hi Stefan!
Been running [B]Elog-2.6.2-1714[/B] successfully for a while and yesterday decided to download and experiment with the latest [B]Elog-2.6.2-1722[/B] build. |
|
Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Oct 11 11:47:29 2006
|
[quote="Gregory M. Caughey"]2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected.[/quote]
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented [b]Suppress email on edit[/b] and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce |
Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box, posted by Gregory M. Caughey on Wed Oct 11 19:37:10 2006
|
[quote="Stefan Ritt"][quote="Gregory M. Caughey"]2.) However, email notifications will be sent under all circumstances regardless of which parameter selected.[/quote]
Thanks for reporting that problem. I just implemented [b]Suppress email on edit[/b] and this could have had some side effect. I tried however to reproduce |
|
Re: Elog v2.6.2-1722 appears to have broken "Suppress default [0|1|2|3]" option on Windows XP box, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Oct 13 16:59:13 2006
|
[quote="Gregory M. Caughey"]Hope this helps a little...[/quote]
Yepp it helped. I could reproduce your problem and fix it. Can you try elog262-4.exe (Revision 1729)? |