ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
315
|
Fri May 2 20:10:48 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: Simulation of a submit |
> Is there a way to simulate an ELOG SUBMIT?
Have a look at the elog utility which comes in the package. It does exactly
this. It "simulates" a browser and does a submit directly to elogd. So you
can either redo the elog code somewhere, or call elog with the proper
command line parameters to insert logbook entries. |
316
|
Sat May 3 11:00:34 2003 |
| Tomas Rudolf | tomas@mba.be | Question | | | Re: Simulation of a submit |
> > Is there a way to simulate an ELOG SUBMIT?
>
> Have a look at the elog utility which comes in the package. It does exactly
> this. It "simulates" a browser and does a submit directly to elogd. So you
> can either redo the elog code somewhere, or call elog with the proper
> command line parameters to insert logbook entries.
Thank you, Stefan! |
320
|
Tue May 6 11:34:22 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: CVS URL |
> Can anyone tell me the URL for the CVS download section
>
> the link has gone from one of the main screens
>
> Cheers
The message stating the URL is still in this forum: elog:233 |
323
|
Wed May 7 16:12:37 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Bug report | | | Re: missing '.' in emails |
>
> missing '.' in emails
> -----------------------
>
> A dot '.' at the beginning of a line is not transmitted via email.
> It is stored in the entry properly though.
>
> Test:
> ./There is a dot just before '/There...'
>
> Greetings, Heiko
Here is what I got as email:
Test:
./There is a dot just before '/There...'
So I guess you mean ONLY a dot at the beginning of the line. In the email
SMTP protocol, at lonely dot at the beginning of the line means "end of
message" and the mail server stops by that. I checked my mail program and
found out that it converts a single dot into two dots at the beginning of the
line. I have to implement this in elgod.c. Thanks for pointing out this
problem. |
325
|
Wed May 7 16:58:34 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | | | Re: |
> I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
> Attachments =" is not being read. Looking at the changelog, I found that
> "Number Attachments" has been removed in favor of "enable attachments". I
> tried looking in the documentation but I can't find a discription of the way
> in which multiple attachments are handled. Can someone give me a pointer?
Just upload one attachment at a time by hitting the "Upload" button, your
message text stays there. Once you are finished, hit "Submit". Sorry, I
thought this would be obvious, since most providers use this for their mail
web interface. |
326
|
Wed May 7 17:27:51 2003 |
| Kevin Ellwood | kevin_ellwood@yahoo.com | Question | | | Re: |
> > I have upgraded elog from version 2.2.4 to 2.3.6 and then entry "Number
> > Attachments =" is not being read. Looking at the changelog, I found that
> > "Number Attachments" has been removed in favor of "enable attachments". I
> > tried looking in the documentation but I can't find a discription of the way
> > in which multiple attachments are handled. Can someone give me a pointer?
>
> Just upload one attachment at a time by hitting the "Upload" button, your
> message text stays there. Once you are finished, hit "Submit". Sorry, I
> thought this would be obvious, since most providers use this for their mail
> web interface.
No need to say sorry. It is probably obvious to pretty much everyone. -- It
the story of my life.
Thanks
Kevin |
328
|
Wed May 7 21:15:57 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Request | | | Re: A NAME=... tags around the attachments |
> it would be useful, if the web server automatically produced tags <A NAME=
> [AttachNo3]>Anhang 3</A> around the entry of the attachment. With this one
> could easily reference in the HTML text an attachement at the end of the
> page.
I added a name tag <A NAME=attx> where x is 1,2,3,... to the attachments
(->CVS). So you reference them by "/<logbook>/<id>#attx" where x is the
attachment number, <id> the message ID (the one displayed in the URL if you
display a single message) and <logbook> is the logbook name.
> I had a problem, when I just put a HTML text with <IMG> tags into the
> formular box and I could not reference them although they were available
> (and displayed pictures) as attachments.
That won't work, since attachments are preceeded by the date/time, to avoid
name collisions if two identical file names are submitted several times. You
see that if you click on an attachment to display only that picture. The URL
in the browser gives you the full URL including the date/time, which you
have to use to reference that image. This is of course not possible if you
are just submitting an entry, since you don't know which exact time the URL
will get. So you first have to submit the message with the attachment, the
lookup the attachment URL, then edit the message again and enter the full
URL. Not very handy, I know, but right now the only way. |
330
|
Thu May 8 15:28:10 2003 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Info | | | Re: Question |
> Can you tell me what the following change in CVS offers
>
> Added lock icon for protected logbooks
>
> Does this relate to the request in article 309
No, unfortunately not (yet). I'm still working on the problem described in
elog:309. This "lock" icon only shows you in the logbook selection page which
logbooks are public and which are protected by passwords (was another
request). |