Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 701 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon2.gif   Re: Forgot Password, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed May 2 09:17:56 2012 

Christopher Lee wrote:

Stefan Ritt wrote:

Christopher Lee wrote:

We seem to have a problem with retrieving user passwords using the forgot password system 

Thanks for reporting that bug. With the help of your config file I finally could reproduce and fix it. The fix is contained in SVN revision 2462.

 Thanks mate.. Glad to know it wasn't just me going insane? I'll keep an eye out for the new file

For the new version have a look here: http://midas.psi.ch/elog/faq.html#21 

icon5.gif   Attachment URL login redirect error, posted by Graham Medlin on Wed Jun 27 14:56:43 2012 

If I have a couple of attachments in a log book entry, I can link to that entry "http://example.edu/elog/Sandbox/7", I get the appropriate log in page, and after logging it, it takes me to the entry.

However, if I link directly an attachment, "http://example.edu/elog/Sandbox/7/1", I receive a plain log in page that doesn't have the stylesheet applied, and logging in, I am directed to " http://example.edu/elog/Sandbox/7/" which throws an invalid error. If I am already logged in the browser, it links correctly. 

I assume the problem must stem from messed up relative URL somewhere, hence the lack of stylesheet, or from the redirect incorrectly handling the /. (Looking at the source for the two login pages, the only difference is "<input type=hidden name=redir value="7">" versus "<input type=hidden name=redir value="7/1">". ) But that reaches the end of my ability...

This breaks the attachment links in emails.

Any help would be much appreciated!

icon5.gif   kerberos authentication , posted by Szu-Ching Peckner on Mon Aug 20 21:48:08 2012 

Hello, I have

authentication = kerberos

kerberos Realm = xxx

I ran tcpdump and know elogd server did attempt to contact kerberos server. I could run kinit username@realm_name, and klist shows my ticket fine. 

I receive "kerberos error 256: Decrypt integrity check failed. Please check your kerberos configuration" when I entered my password wrong purposely on login page.

I receive "Invalid user name or password!' when I entered my correct password. 

Please advise. 

 

 

    icon2.gif   Re: kerberos authentication , posted by Szu-Ching Peckner on Mon Aug 20 22:11:21 2012 

Szu-Ching Peckner wrote:

Hello, I have

authentication = kerberos

kerberos Realm = xxx

I ran tcpdump and know elogd server did attempt to contact kerberos server. I could run kinit username@realm_name, and klist shows my ticket fine. 

I receive "kerberos error 256: Decrypt integrity check failed. Please check your kerberos configuration" when I entered my password wrong purposely on login page.

I receive "Invalid user name or password!' when I entered my correct password. 

Please advise. 

 

 

I forgot to mention, I also have Password file line in elogd.cfg file. Because without password file line, I wouldn't get login screen. I know my test account is not in the main.pwd file. I believe elogd does go to kerberos server to compare password. I just don't get why I get invalid username and password when I entered correct password, while kerberos error (expected) when I enter wrong password.  

Authentication = Kerberos

Kerberos Realm = xxx

Password file = main.pwd

    icon14.gif   Re: kerberos authentication , posted by Szu-Ching Peckner on Tue Aug 21 17:16:19 2012 

Szu-Ching Peckner wrote:

Szu-Ching Peckner wrote:

Hello, I have

authentication = kerberos

kerberos Realm = xxx

I ran tcpdump and know elogd server did attempt to contact kerberos server. I could run kinit username@realm_name, and klist shows my ticket fine. 

I receive "kerberos error 256: Decrypt integrity check failed. Please check your kerberos configuration" when I entered my password wrong purposely on login page.

I receive "Invalid user name or password!' when I entered my correct password. 

Please advise. 

 

 

I forgot to mention, I also have Password file line in elogd.cfg file. Because without password file line, I wouldn't get login screen. I know my test account is not in the main.pwd file. I believe elogd does go to kerberos server to compare password. I just don't get why I get invalid username and password when I entered correct password, while kerberos error (expected) when I enter wrong password.  

Authentication = Kerberos

Kerberos Realm = xxx

Password file = main.pwd

 It's resolved.  I read the documentation again, and found out my mistake. I didnt have username defined on password file. 

icon5.gif   Type <attribute> = Date - Issue, posted by Garret Delaronde on Fri Sep 7 18:19:38 2012 

 I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.

I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work. 

Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.

We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.

Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).

However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.

Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?

Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.

    icon2.gif   Re: Type <attribute> = Date - Issue, posted by David Pilgram on Fri Sep 7 19:08:27 2012 

Garret Delaronde wrote:

 I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.

I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work. 

Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.

We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.

Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).

However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.

Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?

Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.

 Hi Garret,

Why cannot you just use $entry time ?  It uses the date that the entry was made which appears as the first line of every elog entry -

[Sorry for mis-post, just discovered cannot put the 'dollar at' control set in an entry]

MID: 12458
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:22:06 +0100
In reply to: 12453
 

You can use 'Time format = ' to get the date to display in the format you like.  You will see I have posted an issue about 'Date format = '.  I mention this because in trying to understand what was happening, I too had a case where all the dates were showing as the same in a thread.  I suspect your 12/31/1969 was due to the entries as being read were non-existant or blank.

Of course I may have mis-understood your requirements.

 

    icon2.gif   Re: Type <attribute> = Date - Issue, posted by Garret Delaronde on Mon Sep 10 17:18:03 2012 

David Pilgram wrote:

Garret Delaronde wrote:

 I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.

I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work. 

Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.

We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.

Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).

However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.

Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?

Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.

 Hi Garret,

Why cannot you just use $entry time ?  It uses the date that the entry was made which appears as the first line of every elog entry -

[Sorry for mis-post, just discovered cannot put the 'dollar at' control set in an entry]

MID: 12458
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 17:22:06 +0100
In reply to: 12453
 

You can use 'Time format = ' to get the date to display in the format you like.  You will see I have posted an issue about 'Date format = '.  I mention this because in trying to understand what was happening, I too had a case where all the dates were showing as the same in a thread.  I suspect your 12/31/1969 was due to the entries as being read were non-existant or blank.

Of course I may have mis-understood your requirements.

 

 Tried using the Time format setting, however I only want the time to be selected, so when i enter the datetime type it shows the date and time.

If there was a way to just have the time to be drop down menus vs the date and time all together, I would find that helpful.

As for the "$entry time" suggestion, it only serves to log the exact time the entry was made into elog. Where as I want it to be manually set.

In this example we've created an sql script to pull information from an oracle database, which then creates an elog entry.

We have multiple fields which are populated and locked so only admin can edit them.

Our contractor then edits the entry with a date / time / location, and a few other things.

the Date and Time are separate attributes. We'd prefer to keep it like that just because of the other scripts that run on the elog entries, (pulls day by day reports and formats and calculates summaries in excel automatically).

Any other suggestions would be helpful.

Thanks for your reply.

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6