Demo Discussion
Forum Config Examples Contributions Vulnerabilities
  Discussion forum about ELOG, Page 702 of 808  Not logged in ELOG logo
    icon2.gif   Re: Type <attribute> = Date - Issue, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Wed Sep 12 10:50:40 2012 

Garret Delaronde wrote:

 I haven't found anything in the forums about this. Apologies if its a duplicate.

I am fairly familiar with ELog, use it for multiple purposes on 5 different Virtual Servers at work. 

Currently looking to do some updates to one of the instances with the Date Type setting.

We have 17,000 entries all which have had manual entries for a Date Attribute for the last year and 8 months.

Due to regular entry errors on part of our contractors using it, (Eg: using "Aug" instead of "08", or using "-" instead of "/"), I want to change over to using the date type attribute (Type <attribute> = Date).

However the problem i found, the moment i save this in the config, and go to the list of entries, the date has changed on all of the entries to 12/31/1969. Which is BAD for our operation. So after removing the Type Date Setting the dates go back to normal.

Is there anyway to retain those dates so they display as they are and then only new entries would fall under the new date type setting?

Syntax manual didn't help much for this issue.

The problem is, that the existing entries have a string content for this specific attribute.
An attribute with a "date" type content should contain a integer number, which represents the seconds of the epoch (starting with zero on 1-Jan-1970 at 00:00:00).
 
What you need to do is writing a script that reads all *a.log files in the logbook directory and converts lines of the type:
<attribute>: <text>
to lines like
<attribute>: $(date -d "<text>" +%s)
 
Unfortunately elog does not provide you with such a tool.
But since you have to write it now anyway now, you could submit your code to this forum
 
Andreas
icon4.gif   ELOG crashes when editing threads, posted by Louis de Leseleuc on Fri Sep 14 17:59:44 2012 

 Hi,

I am experiencing repeated crashing of the elog daemon.

If I go into select mode while in threaded view, I can select an entire thread by selecting the top entry.

When I do so then press the Edit button, the server crashes.

I have to manually restart it. Syslog shows no error.

This does not happen under Summary or Full view.

Running Ubuntu 12.04, ELOG 2.9.2-2455

I can provide my elog.cfg if necessary.

Cheers!

Louis

P.S. i just crashed the forums ELOG following those same steps!! Sorry!! At least it was restarted in no time.

icon4.gif   Crash with long image names, posted by Josef Uher on Sun Sep 16 21:14:12 2012 Screen_Shot.png

Hi All,

I found that elog crashes if I try to upload an image with long name. It actually uploads the file after the crash. It crashes also if in the full view with attachments visible. If I shorten the name all is fine.

The crash report screenshot is attached. It looks like a too small buffer (?).

 

Screen_Shot.png

icon5.gif   Mysterious Emboldened lines in threaded (collapsed) mode, posted by David Pilgram on Mon Sep 17 13:42:50 2012 
I upgraded my system, including the version of Firefox.

I normally view the topic in Threaded Collapsed mode, right click on the entry I want to reply to, to open a new
Tab.  However, I made a mistake an opened a new Window, as the two 'open' modes in Firefox swapped around.
But no worry, I thought, made my reply as usual.

However, when refreshing the topic afterwards, seemingly randomly distributed throughout the topic were
additional lines, with the latest entry showing up emboldened (but not as a clickable link), and the only
difference being the ID number which showed as 0 (zero).

Deleting the reply only caused the previous reply to show up randomly etc.

In effect, the latest entry is (randomly?) scattered throughout the topic - even in between entries older than
any in that thread, so it's not individial entries in that thread showing up.

The only way to get rid of it was to erase the whole directory, and re-install from backup (which, as it was the
first entry since the new installation, wasn't painful).  It's been fine since - but only so long as I open a
thread in a new tab, and not in a new Window.

I guess the real question is just what is added to some file - perhaps the .cfg file? - that using a separate
window causes this behavioir?  Any whay only as a new window, and given how elog is supposed to work on many
computers, why on this stand-alone computer running two sets of the same browser?

It happened once before at the end of last year during a regression backwards owing to the newer computer
failing and turning back to an older one with older OS and older firefox, where I did the same thing (in
reverse).  As I didn't investigate at that time, I still have the mystery line showing up in that topic.

Sorry this is a bit rambling, but its very hard to describe!
    icon2.gif   Re: Mysterious Emboldened lines in threaded (collapsed) mode, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Tue Sep 18 10:05:27 2012 
> I upgraded my system, including the version of Firefox.
> [...]
> Sorry this is a bit rambling, but its very hard to describe!

A picture can say more than thousand words.
Can you reproduce this with a simple configuration?
If yes, can you attach the configuration, the *a.log files,
a description of what firefox version you're using and please:
some screenshots of "before" and "after"?

Thanks!
Andreas
    icon2.gif   Re: Mysterious Emboldened lines in threaded (collapsed) mode, posted by David Pilgram on Tue Sep 18 18:41:05 2012 
> > I upgraded my system, including the version of Firefox.
> > [...]
> > Sorry this is a bit rambling, but its very hard to describe!
> 
> A picture can say more than thousand words.
> Can you reproduce this with a simple configuration?
> If yes, can you attach the configuration, the *a.log files,
> a description of what firefox version you're using and please:
> some screenshots of "before" and "after"?
> 
> Thanks!
> Andreas
That's odd, I cannot reproduce the problem today - except on the topic [logbook] it already exists on.
Yet nothing has changed.  
I've looked for hidden files, hidden control codes in the *a.log files...  this one had better be put on the
back burner until I can find a way to reproduce it (!).
icon4.gif   ELOG crash related to Kerberos, SSL and Login users, posted by Andreas Luedeke on Mon Nov 26 15:57:49 2012 elogd.cfg
I'm using Kerberos and SSL and experience problems with individual setting of "Login user =" for different logbooks.
Sometimes (not every time, but most times) the server crashes under the following condition:
When I login at one logbook and then change to a logbook, that has a restricted "Login user" list with my login
name not in it. It created the following GDB output:

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
show_elog_list (lbs=0x916b768, past_n=0, last_n=0, page_n=0, default_page=1, info=0x0) at src/elogd.c:19793
19793         message_id = msg_list[index].lbs->el_index[msg_list[index].index].message_id;

Expected behaviour would be to show me the login page with the error message:
"you don't have access to this logbook".
This message is never shown for the attached configuration file.
If I remove the "Guest" commands for logbook "TestB" then elogd behaves properly.

For the moment I've just disabled "Login user" settings.

Regards
Andreas
icon4.gif   Error 554 MailTransferAgentServer ESMTP not accepting messages, posted by Ron Beekman on Mon Dec 10 16:28:27 2012 

Hello,

We use ELOG for many years and enjoy it's functions every day!

Lately, we see errors whenever we add an entry in elog: 554 MailTransferAgentServer ESMTP not accepting messages

We see this from various ELOG servers. Other (non ELOG) servers using the same MailTransferAgentServer do not heve this error.

We are able to send mail messages from the ELOG machines manually via TELNET. So, from a functional point of view, all works well.

We had this error in the past and found out that the cause of this error lies in (network) time-outs.

Questions:
1) Has anyone seen this error before?
2) Is it possible to increase the timeout value used by ELOG?
3) Are the emails that could not be sent stored in a queue/resent later or are they lost?
4) is there a fix?

Any replies are highly appreciated!

T I A !
 

ELOG V3.1.5-3fb85fa6