ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
1532
|
Tue Nov 22 17:38:24 2005 |
| Michael Husbyn | michaelh@online.no | Question | | 2.6.0-beta | Thread sort / display order |
Is there a way to choose the display order in threaded mode.
Eg:
1 Test
2 Version 2.0 Testing 1
3 Version 2.5 Testing 2
4 Version 2.3 Testing 3
But the preferred sort order (not the ID) is something like this:
1 Test
2 Version 2.0 Testing 1
4 Version 2.3 Testing 3
3 Version 2.5 Testing 2
Example of parameter perhaps:
Thread order = Field1, $id
Or is this something too difficult to implement? Or already there?
Best regards
Michael Husbyn |
66726
|
Tue Mar 2 14:21:46 2010 |
| soren poulsen | soren.poulsen@cern.ch | Question | Linux | 2.7.8-2282 | Thread view problem in searches |
Hi,
When I upgrade from build 2278 to 2282 the thread view changes when performing searches: The thread children are not indented and there are no "thread icons" in the search list (e.g. like the read right arrow for replies).
On the forum site I also note that the thread view is not indented when performing searches.
Does anyone have an idea ?
Soren
|
66066
|
Fri Nov 21 11:16:04 2008 |
| Paul O'Shaughnessy | paul_o'shaughnessy@inmarsat.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.5 | Threaded emails |
Can you email a thread of log entries. I think this would be a very useful function, which would enable the logger in effect to send an entire history of a particular issue to the interested parties. |
65929
|
Tue Jul 22 23:23:17 2008 |
| Kevin O'Sullivan | kosok@stanford.edu | Bug report | | 2.7.4 | Thumbnails not working |
I get the following error where thumbnails should go: Cannot create thumbnail, please check ImageMagick installation.
I restarted elog and check the log, it does in fact detect ImageMagick and it does have the most recent version. I'm running ubuntu 2.6.24-19-server. Is there something else I should be checking? |
66522
|
Tue Sep 1 04:15:57 2009 |
| james Goedsir | james.goedsir@stratosglobal.com | Question | Windows | 2.7.7 | Time Display Format |
My Time field is displayed i a 12 Hour format I would like to change it to 24 Hours, can someone advised how it can be done |
69377
|
Wed Jun 23 15:28:00 2021 |
| Maxim | maxsimuus69@gmail.com | Question | Windows | 3.1.4-3 | Timezome problem |
Good afternoon!
The elog does not see the time zone. It displays UTC + 0. When I transfer old entries to a new compiled log, they are displayed 3 hours earlier (my time zone is UTC + 3). When creating a new record, it creates them in the UTC + 0.
Compilation occurs in Cygwin.
Version elog – 3.1.4-3.
Please help solve this problem. |
67943
|
Thu May 28 17:28:20 2015 |
| David Wallis | wallis@aps.anl.gov | Question | Linux | 3.1.0-2 | Timstamp button in ckedit inserts an incorrect string ( elogd 3.1.0-2) |
I just updated to the latest official release (V3.1.0-2411f95) and have this problem:
The Time Stamp button pastes the logbook name when "Time format" is not specified in elogd.cfg, and when it is set to "%m/%d/%Y %H:%M", it adds the string "5/28/."
My users are loving the new functionality added in 3.1! |
2306
|
Mon Aug 6 17:43:52 2007 |
| Steve Jones | steve.jones@freescale.com | Request | All | 2.6.2-1739 | Too many logbooks during user registration |
Stefan, we require registration with elog. We have quite a number of logbooks and when someone requests a login account AND elects to register with all of the logbooks, the resulting URL is apparently too long for browsers to handle when the admins click on the link embedded in the email notification. For example, FireFox (latest ver) appears to truncate the URL *after* submission (the correct URL is there before submission).
My question: Is it possible to limit - or remove - the checkboxes that the user can select during registration? I realize that this is a browser issue but I doubt I can persuade those guys to fix FireFox.
Thanks. |