Re: A new ELOG user wants to register on "127.0.0.1", posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 14 17:29:42 2005
|
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | A new ELOG user wants to register on "127.0.0.1"
the scenario is:
- elog on localhost
- stunnel on the external interface
I dont want elog to listen on external interface, so.. why do not use the URL cfg attribute for this issue ? |
You can specify the interface to liste on with the "-n <interface>" parameter of elogd. |
|
Re: short/long_name should point the same user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 14 17:34:12 2005
|
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | In my case I changed it by error, people inserted entries and now I restored the correct one .. so now I have to unlock the attribute and change every Author by hand as admin
 |
Well, that teaches you not to do this error again  |
|
Re: short/long_name should point the same user, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Jul 14 19:11:54 2005
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | In my case I changed it by error, people inserted entries and now I restored the correct one .. so now I have to unlock the attribute and change every Author by hand as admin
|
Well, that teaches you not to do this error again |
uhm.. I think the confusion intrinsict in elog between long and short name is something to be solved ..
an attribute of type "userlist" fills always with the long_name .. but if I would to insert it as short ?
the users shown in the users admin dropdown menu is short .. why? .. may be I didnt understood the way this issue works ..  |
|
Re: A new ELOG user wants to register on "127.0.0.1", posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Thu Jul 14 19:16:06 2005
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | A new ELOG user wants to register on "127.0.0.1"
the scenario is:
- elog on localhost
- stunnel on the external interface
I dont want elog to listen on external interface, so.. why do not use the URL cfg attribute for this issue ? |
You can specify the interface to liste on with the "-n <interface>" parameter of elogd. |
I know
the following is the configuration I'm telling about... and it raises the problem reported
albert@YYYYYYYYY:~$ ps axu | grep elog
elog 22348 1.0 1.9 23660 20408 ? Ss 11:32 4:54 /usr/sbin/elogd -f /var/run/elogd.pid -c /etc/elog.conf -d /var/lib/elog -s /usr/share/elog -p 8081 -n 127.0.0.1 -x -D
root 22353 0.0 0.2 45436 2276 ? Ss 11:32 0:17 /usr/sbin/stunnel -o /var/log/elog/elog_daemon.log -p /etc/ssl/certs/stunnel_XXXXXXX.pem -d XXXXXX.roma2.infn.it:8080 -r 127.0.0.1:8081
|
|
Re: short/long_name should point the same user, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 14 20:24:07 2005
|
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | uhm.. I think the confusion intrinsict in elog between long and short name is something to be solved ..
an attribute of type "userlist" fills always with the long_name .. but if I would to insert it as short ?
the users shown in the users admin dropdown menu is short .. why? .. may be I didnt understood the way this issue works .. |
The "short name" is the equivalent to the unix login name. Under /etc/passwd, you have a login (short) name and a "full" (long) name. The first may not contain blanks, must be unique, while the second is more like a "real" name. This concept has been adapted in elog. While many people use cryptic or abbreviated login names, it's still nice know the real name, like if you get an email notification from someone. The userlist fills with the long_name because people refer to other people in the logbook usually with the real name (sometimes they even don't know the people's login name). The admin dropdown menu uses the short names because you look at the user database more from an administration point of view. Like if you edit /etc/passwd, you first look at the login name, not the full one. Maybe what one could add is to make the full name in the admin page a dropdown list as well, so the admin can either select the short or the long name. Another item for the wishlist |
|
Re: short/long_name should point the same user, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Fri Jul 15 15:03:01 2005
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | uhm.. I think the confusion intrinsict in elog between long and short name is something to be solved ..
an attribute of type "userlist" fills always with the long_name .. but if I would to insert it as short ?
the users shown in the users admin dropdown menu is short .. why? .. may be I didnt understood the way this issue works .. |
The "short name" is the equivalent to the unix login name. Under /etc/passwd, you have a login (short) name and a "full" (long) name. The first may not contain blanks, must be unique, while the second is more like a "real" name. This concept has been adapted in elog. While many people use cryptic or abbreviated login names, it's still nice know the real name, like if you get an email notification from someone. The userlist fills with the long_name because people refer to other people in the logbook usually with the real name (sometimes they even don't know the people's login name). The admin dropdown menu uses the short names because you look at the user database more from an administration point of view. Like if you edit /etc/passwd, you first look at the login name, not the full one. Maybe what one could add is to make the full name in the admin page a dropdown list as well, so the admin can either select the short or the long name. Another item for the wishlist |
uhmm .. what I am talking about is something simpler ... It seems to me that elog does not use always the "login name" but somethins refers to the "gecos" ... What I'm askinf for is to separe the login name (to which elog has to refer for everything internally) and the long/short_name mechanism that should be a mere display issue ...
May be that it is the same to ask for the introdution of a "user_id" or to treat the login name as the uid, .. the "Author" field should be filled both with the long and the short name (and it is so now!) but, when checking the original author on a Edit action, aelog as to check always the actual logged *short* name against the original Author *short* name .. becoise is only the short name that should have a sense for messages .. the long one is only a nice reminder
Hope my english makes me to be understod now |
|
Re: < img > in Display Attribute, posted by Emiliano Gabrielli on Fri Jul 15 17:28:33 2005
|
the very usefull thing my request will enable is the following:
Options Category = Info,Report,[B]Problem[I]{1}[/I][/B],Other
Preset Category = Info
Display Category = <img style="border:0; float:left; margin-right:5px" src="icons/$category.png">$category
[B]{1}[/B]ROptions Level = Notice,Warning,Alert,Fixed
{1}Preset Level = Warning
[B]{1}Display[/B] Category = <img style="border:0; float:left; margin-right:5px" src="icons/[B]$level[/B].png">[B]$category[/B]
note that this way I could use a single field to have the both the category name and the level icon .. this is specially usefull for a "problem" or "bug" category, becouse this way one can see status of the "bug"..
.. I'd really like conditional Display  |
|
Re: < img > in Display Attribute, posted by Stefan Ritt on Sat Jul 16 12:30:33 2005
|
| Emiliano Gabrielli wrote: | IMHO the solution may be in allowing html code only in the cfg, not in the value of the field..
i.e., elog has to first allow html in the cfg attribute and then replace every $attribute with their values... this values as to be translated in html entities in order to solve the problem
in other wordsthe value of the attribute as to httl_encoded when displayed.. and the cfg line not
or I am loosing some point ? |
I don't like that solution. Sometimes I want to write some HTML tag myself into an attribute (like "<b>") and have this interpreted, meaning having the following word in bold, and sometimes I want to talk about HTML tags, like to tell you to use <b> for bold, and have it not interpreted. The same with the ELCode tags.
So I added an escape character. If you write <b> or [b], then it gets interpreted. If you write \<b> or \[b] with the "\" in front of the tag, it does not get interpreted, thus the '\' works like an escape character. I edited your old entry with the <img> in the subject, and as you see it is now not interpreted.
The modification is in CVS and documented in the ELCode help. |