ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
Draft
|
Thu Mar 3 00:02:26 2016 |
| Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Attribute Field Size Limited to 255 Characters | I currently have an Attribute defined in my .cfg file as "Format <Attribute> = 0, attribname, attribvalue, 120, 500". I've found if I exceed 255 characters elogd.exe fails. Is there a method that will allow me to exceed 255 characters? |
68274
|
Thu Mar 3 00:12:45 2016 |
| Mike Bodine | Mike.Bodine@alcatel-lucent.com | Question | Windows | 2.9.2 | Attribute Field Size Limited to 255 Characters | I currently have an Attribute defined in my .cfg file as "Format <Attribute> = 0, attribname, attribvalue, 120, 500". I've found if I exceed 255 characters elogd.exe fails. Is there a method that will allow me to exceed 255 characters? |
1543
|
Thu Dec 8 10:32:37 2005 |
| Bertram Metz | bmetz@sbs.com | Bug report | Linux | V2.6.0-bet | Attachments in duplicated entries | Hi,
the duplicate command duplicates the entry text itself, but it does not duplicate attachments.
If attachments in a duplicated entry are deleted, the original attachment files are deleted as well and cannot be accessed anymore within the original entry.
My suggestion is to copy the attached files too and to use file names of the copies in the duplicated entry.
Kind regards,
Bertram |
67088
|
Wed Jul 6 12:45:19 2011 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | All | 2.9.0-2411 | Attachments in a different logbook to the entry logbook | Is it possible to have an attachment to an entry in a different directory to the working directory of the logbook being used?
By which I mean, if you have in logbook hidden the attachment files
../logbooks/hidden/110705_235520_whatthis-0.png
../logbooks/hidden/110705_235520_whatthis.pdf
that an entry in another logbook, public, can use the entries in hidden to show them (and do everything that you can do with an attachment)
without making another copy in public?
I see that if, working in public, you attach the .pdf file in hidden, the files get copied across as
../logbooks/public/110705_235520_whatthis-0.png
../logbooks/public/110705_235520_whatthis.pdf
that is, with the original (hidden) timestamp, and no second time stamp superimposed. From which you can gather I've been playing around, manually editing a yymmdda.log file to try and get the result I want, even if for the moment it cannot be done via elog; but without success, although there were some bizarre interpretations by the elog program of the edited yymmdda.log file, depending upon what I tried.
For one entry, it is of course no big deal, copying the files into the public directory, but if you are dealing with multiple huge entries, it does seem wasteful of HD space
But my reason for this is that hidden has restricted access, whereas public has general access. The attachments themselves are not restricted, but comments, history etc around them in the restricted access logbook should not become available to the general viewer. |
66625
|
Mon Nov 23 11:53:22 2009 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.7-2266 | Attachments and images of attachments | Hi Stefan,
I attached a 12 page (22kB) pdf file - no images - to an entry, but elog only converted the first 8 pages to
images (.png). This is reproducable, i.e. a different small multipage pdf file produced the same number of images.
The size of the pdf file does not seem to be a problem, a single page pdf file with a lot of images in it
attached as expected.
Is this correct, or a defined limitation? |
67104
|
Wed Aug 31 14:00:17 2011 |
| David Pilgram | David.Pilgram@epost.org.uk | Question | All | 2.9.0-2411 | Attachments (again) | OK, so no-one has ideas as per my question in elog:67088.
Looking at the issue from another angle.
If you attach a pdf file (for example), two files are added to the logbook:
../logbooks/hidden/110705_235520_whatthis-0.png
../logbooks/hidden/110705_235520_whatthis.pdf
Is there any way that you can select an attachent, but only the thumbnail (.png in this case) is stored (and
subsequently viewed)? Options for ability to select an attachment, or how the thumbnail is manipulated/viewed
exist, but nothing about the storage or otherwise of the original document that I can find.
I've tried manually deleting the .pdf file (after going through the automatic routine to make an attachment),
and elog doesn't seem upset at the lack of the .pdf file at all. The only time anything happens is if one
clicks on the image - and then you get a 'file not found' message from the browser - I could live with that.
In my case the original .pdf file is elsewhere, I've no need to have duplicates scatted in various logbooks, and
while ideally that would also be true of the thumbnail, it is fair enough for this to be stored in each logbook
where it is required. This removes the issue of how to have an attachment in a different logbook (other than by
links, which would get rather tiresome to have to keep making).
Anyone any ideas? |
66196
|
Fri Feb 6 12:08:49 2009 |
| Steve Williamson | StephenWilliamson@Barnsley.gov.uk | Question | Linux | 2.7.5 | Attachments | If I open an elog entry as read-only then attachments show as links which can be clicked to open the attachment. However, if I open an entry using Edit then attachments show as text with a delete button - I would expect to be able to read attachments when editing an entry but there may be some good reason for not being able to.
Also, on attachments, if I click on the attachment icon (paperclip) on the list page the URL encodes "/" as "%2f", e.g.
http://xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx:8080/Change_Log/..%2FChange_Log%2F090205_123135%2FCHANGE_CONTROL_NOTICE_050209.doc and I get the following error:
"Invalid URL: Change_Log/..%2FChange_Log%2F090205_123135%2FCHANGE_CONTROL_NOTICE_050209.doc" . If I then change all occurrences of "%2f" to "/" the link works.
We don't use attachments very often but occasionally they are just what you need - and so is elog!
great piece of software - many thanks for sharing it
Steve
|
66228
|
Fri Feb 27 16:43:01 2009 |
| Dennis Seitz | denseitz@comcast.net | Bug report | Mac OSX | 2.7.5 | Attachment problems | Apologies if these are known bugs, I'm very busy at the moment but I wanted to post this before I forget:
I'm using Safari on a Mac to make Elog entries.
1) The preview of some pdf attachments in edit mode displays huge areas of white space around each page. I can send examples if you'd like - please email me directly, for some reason I never get email notifications from this forum (and they aren't being tagged as spam, so I don't know where they go).
2) When that happens, the text entry area for ELcode format expands horizontally to match the huge pdf file width. Text without line feeds then doesn't wrap until the huge window width is filled, so I have to scroll horizontally all the time while editing to see what I've written.
3) So I turned off attachment previewing as a workaround (Preview attachments = 0 ). That worked fine by not expanding the entry area, but I noticed some odd behavior. The list of attachments below the text entry area is badly formatted. Here's a screen shot:
I tried to reproduce this with a new entry but the text was formatted properly for that entry.
P.S. While editing this entry, I see that the text area width is again being set by the width of the picture I've attached - try it yourself; if you try to resize your browser window smaller while editing, the text will only wrap until the width of the attachment is reached - the text no longer wraps at smaller widths than the attachment. |
|