ID |
Date |
Author |
Subject |
454
|
Thu Nov 26 18:59:27 2015 |
Robert Adams | Saving histogram data |
I would really love to be able to save histogram data, though I have not been able to do this. I could take a screenshot and extract the data from an image, but would prefer to avoid this if there is a simpler way... possibly I have overlooked something obvious? Thanks very much for any advice or tips. |
453
|
Wed Nov 25 17:36:25 2015 |
Chris Thompson | PC software beyond Windows 7 |
I tried this suggestion of changing the startup settings to ingore driver license signing (as suggested in the post # 434), but when I tried to install the software I got a error message which I captured from the screen and I have attached. Perhaps I have the wrong version, or, as suggested, the file I downloaded from your site is incomplete?
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Have a look here elog:434
Chris Thompson wrote: |
I am new to this forum. I have ordered a DRS4 evaluation board for doing experiments with very fast PET detectors. It has not arrived yet. The version of the manual I downloaded today shows software installation instructions for Windows 7 and earlier versions. I intend to use it on a 64bit PC running Windows 8.1. Will the Windows 7 driver work, or is there an updated version for Windows 8 or 10?
|
|
|
452
|
Wed Nov 25 08:20:47 2015 |
Stefan Ritt | PC software beyond Windows 7 |
Have a look here elog:434
Chris Thompson wrote: |
I am new to this forum. I have ordered a DRS4 evaluation board for doing experiments with very fast PET detectors. It has not arrived yet. The version of the manual I downloaded today shows software installation instructions for Windows 7 and earlier versions. I intend to use it on a 64bit PC running Windows 8.1. Will the Windows 7 driver work, or is there an updated version for Windows 8 or 10?
|
|
451
|
Wed Nov 25 02:52:35 2015 |
Chris Thompson | PC software beyond Windows 7 |
I am new to this forum. I have ordered a DRS4 evaluation board for doing experiments with very fast PET detectors. It has not arrived yet. The version of the manual I downloaded today shows software installation instructions for Windows 7 and earlier versions. I intend to use it on a 64bit PC running Windows 8.1. Will the Windows 7 driver work, or is there an updated version for Windows 8 or 10? |
450
|
Thu Nov 5 00:18:42 2015 |
Will Flanagan | Latest macro for DRS4 V5 |
Hi Stefan,
This is absolutely perfect.
Thanks,
Will
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Have a look here: elog:361
Will Flanagan wrote: |
Hi DRS4 Experts,
I have an extremely naive question: Is there any official macro to unpack the DRS4 binary files? All I am looking to do is to plot a few of my waveforms and manipulate them in root. I am using OSX 10.10 and ROOT 5.34.
Thanks in advance,
Will
|
|
|
449
|
Wed Nov 4 15:40:10 2015 |
Stefan Ritt | Latest macro for DRS4 V5 |
Have a look here: elog:361
Will Flanagan wrote: |
Hi DRS4 Experts,
I have an extremely naive question: Is there any official macro to unpack the DRS4 binary files? All I am looking to do is to plot a few of my waveforms and manipulate them in root. I am using OSX 10.10 and ROOT 5.34.
Thanks in advance,
Will
|
|
448
|
Tue Nov 3 23:15:38 2015 |
Will Flanagan | Latest macro for DRS4 V5 |
I should of course mention that I looked through the DRS4 website and didn't see anything obvious: https://www.psi.ch/drs/evaluation-board
Thanks,
Will
Will Flanagan wrote: |
Hi DRS4 Experts,
I have an extremely naive question: Is there any official macro to unpack the DRS4 binary files? All I am looking to do is to plot a few of my waveforms and manipulate them in root. I am using OSX 10.10 and ROOT 5.34.
Thanks in advance,
Will
|
|
447
|
Tue Nov 3 22:37:56 2015 |
Will Flanagan | Latest macro for DRS4 V5 |
Hi DRS4 Experts,
I have an extremely naive question: Is there any official macro to unpack the DRS4 binary files? All I am looking to do is to plot a few of my waveforms and manipulate them in root. I am using OSX 10.10 and ROOT 5.34.
Thanks in advance,
Will |
Draft
|
Wed Oct 7 13:06:34 2015 |
Ilja Bekman | Voltage Calibration with signal on the input |
|
445
|
Wed Aug 19 15:07:53 2015 |
Martin Petriska | QtPALS |
There is software for DRS4 board and positron lifetime measurement availiable. Still in beta but works. Its usable for measuring time between pulses in two or three channels and histogramming that time. (May be time of flight measurement should be tested too) Project code is here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/qtpals/. More about it is here http://iopscience.iop.org/1742-6596/505/1/012044/. Still tested only with v3 and v4 evaluation board, but should work with new callibration in v5 board too. |
444
|
Fri Aug 7 20:32:15 2015 |
Felix Bachmair | DRS4 |
Hi
Did you copy the udev rule 41-drs.rules into /etc/udev/rules.d/ ?
Which operating system are you using?
Cheers
Felix
dante wrote: |
Hi
I have just installed DRS4, but when I try to view it from the USB it don't work. Why?
[ .../home $] lsusb -d 04b4:1175 -v
Bus 002 Device 008: ID 04b4:1175 Cypress Semiconductor Corp.
Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
Device Descriptor:
|
|
443
|
Fri Aug 7 18:41:37 2015 |
dante | DRS4 |
Hi
I have just installed DRS4, but when I try to view it from the USB it don't work. Why?
[ .../home $] lsusb -d 04b4:1175 -v
Bus 002 Device 008: ID 04b4:1175 Cypress Semiconductor Corp.
Couldn't open device, some information will be missing
Device Descriptor: |
442
|
Thu Jul 23 13:46:12 2015 |
Stefan Ritt | Measure the time between different samples |
> Hi,
> I have a question using a data acquisition card base on DRS4 chip. How can I measure the time between several samples of one channel,with the accuracy of like nanoseconds , for I am using the internal trigger. Is there any complete work about this problem?
> One conceivable way is using an global counter in FPGA, but I'm wondering how to synch the counter with the DRS4 sampling.
> Thanks.
> Chenfei Yang
I do not know exactly what you do, so it's hard to give an advice. All I can say that the DRS4 Evaluation Board from PSI allows time measurements between two channels in the order of a few pico seconds. You can download the software for this board from the DRS4 web site and
have a look how things are done.
The trigger position is not a good time reference, since the trigger position jitters by a few samples. So if you want to measure the time of a signal versus a trigger, you have to put this trigger in a free channel of the DRS4 and use that as a time reference.
Best regards,
Stefan |
441
|
Mon Jul 20 09:25:38 2015 |
Chenfei Yang | Measure the time between different samples |
Hi,
I have a question using a data acquisition card base on DRS4 chip. How can I measure the time between several samples of one channel,with the accuracy of like nanoseconds , for I am using the internal trigger. Is there any complete work about this problem?
One conceivable way is using an global counter in FPGA, but I'm wondering how to synch the counter with the DRS4 sampling.
Thanks.
Chenfei Yang |
440
|
Tue Jul 7 09:29:21 2015 |
Felix Bachmair | Creation of Object files |
Yes of course no problem.
You can download via github https://github.com/veloxid/DRS4-v5-shared and I also put it in the attachment.
It's tested with Ubuntu, Fedora and RHEL.
For mac OSX one needs to create a dylib out of the so file.
Cheers
Felix
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Anyhow it would be nice if you just post your Makefile here, which runs with the standard distribution, so people can use it if needed.
Stefan
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
That's fine for me. I thought it might be interesting for others as well..
Cheers
Felix
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hi Felix,
the distribution does not contain any binaries, since there are too many Linux distributions around, so everybody compiles from the sources under Linux. Do you want me to just add libDRS.so to the official Makefile? Actually you are the first one asking for this. Would it be beneficial to have this in the distribution, or can you just maintain your own Makefile in the github repository?
Stefan
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
HI,
We are using the DRS4 Board in the EUDAQ framework [1]. We wrote a a Producer based on the software of the evaluation board, which is using the DRS class/header/src files.
In order to make it work we needed to compile it with a shared object file. [2]
Would it be possbile to include a shared object in the 'official' release?
Cheers
Felix
[1]https://telescopes.desy.de/EUDAQ
[2]https://github.com/veloxid/DRS4-v5-shared
|
|
|
|
|
439
|
Mon Jul 6 19:25:27 2015 |
Stefan Ritt | Creation of Object files |
Anyhow it would be nice if you just post your Makefile here, which runs with the standard distribution, so people can use it if needed.
Stefan
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
Hi Stefan,
That's fine for me. I thought it might be interesting for others as well..
Cheers
Felix
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hi Felix,
the distribution does not contain any binaries, since there are too many Linux distributions around, so everybody compiles from the sources under Linux. Do you want me to just add libDRS.so to the official Makefile? Actually you are the first one asking for this. Would it be beneficial to have this in the distribution, or can you just maintain your own Makefile in the github repository?
Stefan
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
HI,
We are using the DRS4 Board in the EUDAQ framework [1]. We wrote a a Producer based on the software of the evaluation board, which is using the DRS class/header/src files.
In order to make it work we needed to compile it with a shared object file. [2]
Would it be possbile to include a shared object in the 'official' release?
Cheers
Felix
[1]https://telescopes.desy.de/EUDAQ
[2]https://github.com/veloxid/DRS4-v5-shared
|
|
|
|
438
|
Mon Jul 6 11:30:56 2015 |
Felix Bachmair | Creation of Object files |
Hi Stefan,
That's fine for me. I thought it might be interesting for others as well..
Cheers
Felix
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Hi Felix,
the distribution does not contain any binaries, since there are too many Linux distributions around, so everybody compiles from the sources under Linux. Do you want me to just add libDRS.so to the official Makefile? Actually you are the first one asking for this. Would it be beneficial to have this in the distribution, or can you just maintain your own Makefile in the github repository?
Stefan
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
HI,
We are using the DRS4 Board in the EUDAQ framework [1]. We wrote a a Producer based on the software of the evaluation board, which is using the DRS class/header/src files.
In order to make it work we needed to compile it with a shared object file. [2]
Would it be possbile to include a shared object in the 'official' release?
Cheers
Felix
[1]https://telescopes.desy.de/EUDAQ
[2]https://github.com/veloxid/DRS4-v5-shared
|
|
|
437
|
Fri Jul 3 17:13:27 2015 |
Stefan Ritt | Creation of Object files |
Hi Felix,
the distribution does not contain any binaries, since there are too many Linux distributions around, so everybody compiles from the sources under Linux. Do you want me to just add libDRS.so to the official Makefile? Actually you are the first one asking for this. Would it be beneficial to have this in the distribution, or can you just maintain your own Makefile in the github repository?
Stefan
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
HI,
We are using the DRS4 Board in the EUDAQ framework [1]. We wrote a a Producer based on the software of the evaluation board, which is using the DRS class/header/src files.
In order to make it work we needed to compile it with a shared object file. [2]
Would it be possbile to include a shared object in the 'official' release?
Cheers
Felix
[1]https://telescopes.desy.de/EUDAQ
[2]https://github.com/veloxid/DRS4-v5-shared
|
|
436
|
Thu Jul 2 13:20:51 2015 |
Felix Bachmair | Creation of Object files |
HI,
We are using the DRS4 Board in the EUDAQ framework [1]. We wrote a a Producer based on the software of the evaluation board, which is using the DRS class/header/src files.
In order to make it work we needed to compile it with a shared object file. [2]
Would it be possbile to include a shared object in the 'official' release?
Cheers
Felix
[1]https://telescopes.desy.de/EUDAQ
[2]https://github.com/veloxid/DRS4-v5-shared |
435
|
Thu Jul 2 08:53:17 2015 |
Felix Bachmair | Issue with Trigger rates below ~100Hz |
Hi,
We did a further investigation of this problem:
We figured out that this issue seems to be related to the kernel.
We tested it now on two machines with Ubuntu 14.04.2 LTS (kernel 3.16.0-41), one with RHEL 6.6 (kernel 2.6.32) , one with Fedora 20 (kernel 3.18.7) and one with Mac OSX. We see this issue with the Ubuntu and the fedroa machines.Both have a kernel above 3.0 while RHEL has a kernel of 2.6
We can repoduce the problem on all input channels as a trigger.
I will try to find out what could be the cause of it.
Cheers
Felix
Felix Bachmair wrote: |
Hi
We are working with the DRS 4 V5 version and we investigated an issue with the trigger at rates below ~120 Hz.
As long as we have a trigger rate of more than 125 Hz. everything seems to work fine and we are recording more or less all events.
As soon as we go lower in input trigger rate to 100Hz, we see a drop in trigger rates to approx 15 - 20 Hz.
When we use the new firmware we can see that the busy signal is 0 for much longer times than usual up to .5 seconds.
We made a plot of input trigger rate vs trigger rate of drs: https://plot.ly/~simon.corrodi/316
In the oscilloscope plots one can see the the trigger in in yellow and the trig out from drs board in blue.
Do you have any idea what could be the reason?
We also
|
|