Edit Mode - Icons, posted by Behdad D on Wed Jan 26 11:33:51 2011
|
Hi all,
Is there a way to add more icons to the currently available icons when you are in the edit mode. For example instead of having this |
Re: Edit Mode - Icons, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 08:46:23 2011
|
Behdad D wrote:
Hi all, |
|
Re: Edit Mode - Icons, posted by Behdad D on Wed Feb 9 08:59:40 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Edit Mode - Icons, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Feb 9 09:03:25 2011
|
Behdad D wrote:
|
|
Re: Edit Mode - Icons, posted by Behdad D on Wed Feb 9 13:04:56 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Edit Mode - Icons, posted by Behdad D on Wed Feb 9 13:12:13 2011
|
Behdad D wrote:
|
Odd bug with conditional and required attributes, posted by T. Ribbrock on Fri Feb 4 23:48:54 2011
|
I just ran into an odd bug with conditional attributes: If I add a certain attribute to "Required Attributes", none of the conditionals will
work anymore. I have tried to create a small logbook definition that will demonstrate the problem (the original logbook is more complex and uses two sets
of conditionals, both of which will be disabled when the bug hits): |
|
Re: Odd bug with conditional and required attributes, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 15:14:36 2011
|
T. Ribbrock wrote:
I just ran into an odd bug with conditional attributes: If I add a certain attribute to "Required |
|
Re: Odd bug with conditional and required attributes, posted by T. Ribbrock on Mon Feb 7 17:26:26 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Fckedit and quotation style sheets, posted by Robert Heine on Wed Feb 2 15:26:53 2011
|
Dear colleagues,
I have edited my own style sheets for elog, but if I use the reply function while having fckedit as editor, the quotations have the standard elog
colors, not mine. With elog's own editor, I get my colors. I figured out that fckedit inserts the quote as HTML-block with "hard coded" colors, |
|
Re: Fckedit and quotation style sheets, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Feb 7 16:44:54 2011
|
Robert Heine wrote:
Dear colleagues, |
|
Strange problem with dates - need debugging help, posted by T. Ribbrock on Fri Feb 4 00:11:09 2011
|
I have just installed elog 2.8.1 on my OpenBSD 4.8 server (I've added the necessary Makefile patch to "Contributions"). Everything seems to
work fine, however, I ran into a very odd problems with the dates of the logbook entries: When I start a new entry, the current date/time is displayed
correctly. When I submit the entry and look at it again, the date has changed to some value in 1996 |
|
Re: Strange problem with dates - need debugging help, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Feb 4 10:20:12 2011
|
T. Ribbrock wrote:
I have just installed elog 2.8.1 on my OpenBSD 4.8 server (I've added the necessary Makefile patch to |
Re: Strange problem with dates - need debugging help, posted by T. Ribbrock on Fri Feb 4 11:52:45 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
The problem is most probably related to the time zone. elogd contains a function: |
|
Error Message in "Demo of database-like elog", posted by mike cianci on Thu Apr 9 12:50:03 2009
|
I attempted to remove the text editor (like you did in "Demo of database-like elog") using "Show text = 0".
In both your Demo and my logbook when you hit "New" - Explorer generates the folowing error message
Error: The Textarea with id or name set to "text" was not found. |
|
Re: Error Message in "Demo of database-like elog", posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Apr 9 13:04:51 2009
|
mike cianci wrote:
|
|
Re: Error Message in "Demo of database-like elog", posted by Robert Heine on Thu Aug 26 11:27:08 2010
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Error Message in "Demo of database-like elog", posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Sep 22 14:30:53 2010
|
Robert Heine wrote:
|
|
Re: Error Message in "Demo of database-like elog", posted by Robert Heine on Wed Feb 2 14:04:19 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
Working Ubuntu 10.10 ELOG binaries, posted by Louis de Leseleuc on Wed Jan 26 19:35:48 2011
|
Hello,
Can anyone please send me, or publicly provide, working Ubuntu 10.10 binaries (64-bit) for ELOG?
I have compiled and installed the program. While the core functionalities are OK, I have run into irritating bugs in filtering and config editing |
|
Re: Working Ubuntu 10.10 ELOG binaries, posted by Louis de Leseleuc on Wed Jan 26 19:38:58 2011
|
Louis de Leseleuc wrote:
Hello, |
Wishlist: Roption, posted by David Pilgram on Thu Jan 20 18:51:53 2011
|
Hi Stefan,
Roptions, or Radio Buttons. Do you recall that on old
|
|
Re: Wishlist: Roption, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Jan 21 08:49:31 2011
|
> I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
> done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
> selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
|
|
Re: Wishlist: Roption, posted by David Pilgram on Fri Jan 21 11:28:02 2011
|
> > I'd like this same facility with elog. Now I know that it can be
> > done by (for example) in the config file preselecting one of the
> > selections on reply- or indeed one that does not exist to "clear" it,
|
|
Modification aren't accepted, posted by bob on Wed Jan 19 16:03:38 2011
|
hello,
At home, when I change the config *. cfg, the modifications are not taken in consideration
Have you got a idea ? |
|
Re: Modification aren't accepted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Wed Jan 19 16:10:58 2011
|
bob wrote:
hello, |
|
Re: Modification aren't accepted, posted by bob on Wed Jan 19 16:19:56 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Modification aren't accepted, posted by David Pilgram on Wed Jan 19 18:19:49 2011
|
bob wrote:
|
|
Re: Modification aren't accepted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 20 08:51:13 2011
|
David Pilgram wrote:
|
|
Re: Modification aren't accepted, posted by bob on Thu Jan 20 13:49:22 2011
|
Stefan Ritt wrote:
|
|
Re: Modification aren't accepted, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jan 20 13:52:04 2011
|
bob wrote:
|