Re: Special characters in attribute names, posted by Steve Williamson on Wed Nov 26 12:49:08 2008
|
| Stefan Ritt wrote: |
|
Thanks to your detailed description I could reproduce and fix the problem. Please download SVN revision #2144 and give it a try.
|
Tested SVN v 2147 and all looks OK
thanks
Steve |
|
Re: Spec file change, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue May 9 08:07:00 2006
|
| Stephen A. Wood wrote: | | Could the "Copyright:" line in the elog.spec file be changed to "License:" for the next release? Without this change an RPM can't be built on FC4 (RPM 4.4.1). With the change, rpms can still be built in Enterprise linux 3 (RPM 4.2.3). |
Wow, the RPM build depends on that name? Interesting. I changed it in the SVN version, so it will be contained in the next release. |
|
Re: Space in logbook name with password list results in "List" menu acting strange, posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Feb 22 10:35:17 2005
|
> If you have a space in a logbook name and you enable password list, then
> the "List" menu option forces you to the login page each time.
> The URL says "aaa+bbb", but when you do not have passwords enabled, the
> URL is "aaa bbb"
Thanks for reporting this. I fixed it in the current CVS version. |
|
Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by Stefan Ritt on Tue Jun 4 12:03:18 2013
|
> By default, elog enties are sorted by their ID number. When viewing a logbook in Full or Summary, they are
> shown in strict order of ID. In Threaded, entries are shown in strict order of ID for the latest entry of each
> thread, and then previous entries (in reply to) back from the latest one.
>
> In collapsed mode, it is only the starting entry of each thread is shown (or the latest one if "collapse to
> last" chosen, but that's a detail).
>
> I have a couple of logbooks where I'd like the default sorting to be by another numeric attribute that I enter.
>
> Now this works fine in Full or Summary mode. In threaded mode (e.g. default for this forum, where every entry
> is shown but are grouped by thread), it works in as much as all the entres are there and in order, but it
> doesn't quite look the same as when sorting by ID - the replies are not each offset further right beneath the
> entry it is in reply to, but all just slightly offset to the first entry.
>
> If you try to [completely] collapse the threaded mode to just one line per threaded topic - it doesn't. Looks
> (almost) the same as threaded.
>
> I was hoping to get the list of entries collapsed to one line per thread, in order of the numeric attribute, but
> I cannot seem to get this to happen. Have I missed something here? Or is it possible at all?
This is not possible at the moment, but I will add it to the wish list. |
|
Re: Sorting by numeric attribute (not entry ID)., posted by David Pilgram on Tue Jun 4 15:00:23 2013
|
> > By default, elog enties are sorted by their ID number. When viewing a logbook in Full or Summary, they are
> > shown in strict order of ID. In Threaded, entries are shown in strict order of ID for the latest entry of each
> > thread, and then previous entries (in reply to) back from the latest one.
> >
> > In collapsed mode, it is only the starting entry of each thread is shown (or the latest one if "collapse to
> > last" chosen, but that's a detail).
> >
> > I have a couple of logbooks where I'd like the default sorting to be by another numeric attribute that I enter.
> >
> > Now this works fine in Full or Summary mode. In threaded mode (e.g. default for this forum, where every entry
> > is shown but are grouped by thread), it works in as much as all the entres are there and in order, but it
> > doesn't quite look the same as when sorting by ID - the replies are not each offset further right beneath the
> > entry it is in reply to, but all just slightly offset to the first entry.
> >
> > If you try to [completely] collapse the threaded mode to just one line per threaded topic - it doesn't. Looks
> > (almost) the same as threaded.
> >
> > I was hoping to get the list of entries collapsed to one line per thread, in order of the numeric attribute, but
> > I cannot seem to get this to happen. Have I missed something here? Or is it possible at all?
>
> This is not possible at the moment, but I will add it to the wish list.
OK, Thanks Stefan. |
|
Re: Sorting by column title problem, posted by Stefan Ritt on Fri Apr 27 08:23:04 2007
|
| George Chisholm wrote: | I am implementing ELOG for our Gas Control Centre.
Log entries sort ok when I click the ID or Date column title but not my custom attributes column headers???
Any suggestions? |
Indeed that was a bug, thanks for reporting it. I fixed it in the intermediate release which you can download at
http://midas.psi.ch/elog/download/windows/elog265-2.exe
| George Chisholm wrote: | | Where do we send donations? |
I have a PayPal account associated with my email address.
- Stefan |
|
Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Stefan Ritt on Thu Jul 3 08:57:32 2008
|
| Steve Williamson wrote: |
|
We use elog for (amongst other things) a simple change management log. About two dozen users allowed to do updates and their email addresses are listed at the bottom of the page to allow any of them to be included on circulation for a change request. The email addresses appear in the order that they were added (i.e. apparently random). Is there any way to sort these, ideally by Last part of Full Name/First part of Full Name, but login name or email address would be OK?
|
Ok, I added sorting for "museremail" and "muserlist" type of attributes. Sorting is simply done by sorting the email addresses and first part of full name, respectively. The change is implemented in SVN revision #2115. |
|
Re: Sorting Museremail, posted by Stefan Ritt on Mon Nov 17 10:08:01 2008
|
| Steve Williamson wrote: |
|
Hi
I've just upgraded to 2.7.5 mainly because I wanted to have Museremail sorted. We use this to list contacts on an RFC form and it's much easier to find the ones you want when they are in a predictable sequence. As an extension to this it would be great if they could be sorted by the last part of their real name - typical user, give him a sweetie and he wants jam on it!
cheers
Steve
|
That's a bit hard since different groups enter their names differently. While for a human it's easy to figure out what the family name is (usually), this must not be true for a computer. So I would propose that you enter the real names in the sequence family name, given name like
Ritt, Stefan
Doe, John
then sorting will work as you like. |