ID |
Date |
Icon |
Author |
Author Email |
Category |
OS |
ELOG Version |
Subject |
66976
|
Wed Dec 15 08:49:30 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.8 | Re: how to retrieve attachment on execute new |
Zbigniew Reszela wrote: |
Zbigniew Reszela wrote: |
Hello all,
I have a problem with retrieving attachments of an entry on "Execute new" command. In the syntax of elodg.cfg it is: In addition the list of all attachments can be referred to via $<attachment>. Could anyone explain it a little bit more explicit, or attach an example?
Thank you in advance.
|
Hello again,
I have managed with problem by using $attachments. This provides me a list o paths to attachments. If it's the correct way to use it please change elogd.cfg syntax page.
Thanks a lot.
|
Yes, indeed there was a typo in the documentation, $attachments is the correct one. I changed that in the syntax page. |
66975
|
Tue Dec 14 20:16:46 2010 |
| Arno Teunisse | A.teeling3@chello.nl | Question | Windows | 280-5 | Re: How can Elog start automatically on Windows Server 2008 on startup ? |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Philipp W. wrote: |
Hi all,
i have a question... How can i manage it that elog starts automatically on windows startup ? I always need to type "elogd -p 85" in the console that it starts ...
Can anyone help me ? =)
Thanks
SenoX
|
If you install elog with the installer from the distribution, it installs elog as a windows service, which is started automatically when windows starts.
|
Hello
When the install did not work properly ( I've never had that problem ) you can start the elog service with the SC.EXE command like this :
sc.exe create Elog binpath= "\"c:\program files\elog\elogd.exe\" -D -c \"c:\program files\elog\elogd.cfg\"" displayname= "Elogbook services" start= auto type= own
Please notice the spaces after the = ( they are required )
You can now use :
net start elog
and
net stop elog
to start the service without a reboot.
Maybe this helps.
|
66974
|
Tue Dec 14 18:43:38 2010 |
| Zbigniew Reszela | zreszela@cells.es | Question | Linux | 2.8 | Re: how to retrieve attachment on execute new |
Zbigniew Reszela wrote: |
Hello all,
I have a problem with retrieving attachments of an entry on "Execute new" command. In the syntax of elodg.cfg it is: In addition the list of all attachments can be referred to via $<attachment>. Could anyone explain it a little bit more explicit, or attach an example?
Thank you in advance.
|
Hello again,
I have managed with problem by using $attachments. This provides me a list o paths to attachments. If it's the correct way to use it please change elogd.cfg syntax page.
Thanks a lot. |
66973
|
Tue Dec 14 10:37:41 2010 |
| Zbigniew Reszela | zreszela@cells.es | Question | Linux | 2.8 | how to retrieve attachment on execute new |
Hello all,
I have a problem with retrieving attachments of an entry on "Execute new" command. In the syntax of elodg.cfg it is: In addition the list of all attachments can be referred to via $<attachment>. Could anyone explain it a little bit more explicit, or attach an example?
Thank you in advance.
|
66972
|
Mon Dec 13 20:59:07 2010 |
| Diego Obradors Campos | diego.obradors.campos@cern.ch | Question | Windows | 2.8 | elog as a service in windows not detect Imagemagick |
I have installed elog 2.8 in a windows pc with the installer from the distribution, it installs elog as a windows service, which is started automatically when windows starts.
It is done as:
"C:\Archivos de programa\ELOG\elogd.exe" -D -c "C:\Archivos de programa\ELOG\elogd.cfg"
Moreover Imagemagick and GhostScript are in the path:
Version: ImageMagick 6.6.4-6 2010-09-21 Q16 http://www.imagemagick.org
Copyright: Copyright (C) 1999-2010 ImageMagick Studio LLC
Features: OpenMP
However the indexing loogbooks are only working fine when elog is started interactively. Is there any posiblity to start elog as a service and use thumbnails for quick preview?
Thank you in advance!
|
66971
|
Tue Dec 7 09:40:19 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Linux | 2.8.0 | Re: Adding attachment to an existing entry |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
there is however now the problem that one has to click Submit twice to make it work
|
I fixed this problem in the current SVN revision, so now a single click to the Submit button is enough again. |
66970
|
Tue Dec 7 09:38:56 2010 |
| Stefan Ritt | stefan.ritt@psi.ch | Question | Windows | 280-5 | Re: How can Elog start automatically on Windows Server 2008 on startup ? |
Philipp W. wrote: |
Hi all,
i have a question... How can i manage it that elog starts automatically on windows startup ? I always need to type "elogd -p 85" in the console that it starts ...
Can anyone help me ? =)
Thanks
SenoX
|
If you install elog with the installer from the distribution, it installs elog as a windows service, which is started automatically when windows starts. |
66969
|
Mon Dec 6 16:43:29 2010 |
| Mariusz Stakowski | Mariusz.Stakowski@asseco.pl | Question | Linux | 2.8.0 | Re: Adding attachment to an existing entry |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Mariusz Stakowski wrote: |
Stefan Ritt wrote: |
Mariusz Stakowski wrote: |
Hello,
I have a problem when I try to edit an existing entry. I want to add an attachment. I can upload an attachment to the existing entry, but submitting it does not seem to work. The added attachment is not visible. But it exists in logbook directory. The only way I found to add it, is to use "Resubmit as new entry" which is not quite what I want. Is it a design feature or perhaps I'm doing something wrong ?
|
I need to reproduce this problem in order to fix it. Do you see the same problem on the "Demo" forum?
https://midas.psi.ch/elogs/Linux+Demo/
|
I'm sorry for the false alert :(. I was trying to submit edited entry using "upper submit" (just under the logbook name strip). I have tried "lower submit" (under Attachment 2) and it works with no problem.
|
Well, also the "upper submit" button should work. I just tried at the demo logbook, and it worked fine (there is however now the problem that one has to click Submit twice to make it work). Can you check yourself?
|
Stefan,
I have checked it and it behaves exactly as you have described it. Perhaps this "double click" has led me to that false conclusion ?
|